An enormous amount of investigation with regard to European ethnology has been carried on in recent years. These labours have chiefly consisted in the study of the physical type Ethnology. of different countries or districts, but it is not necessary to consider in detail the results arrived at. It should, however, be pointed out that the idea of an Aryan race may be regarded as definitely abandoned. One cannot even speak with assurance of the diffusion of an Aryan civilization. It is at least not certain that the civilization that was spread by the migration of peoples speaking Aryan tongues originated amongst and remained for a time peculiar to such peoples. The utmost that can be said is that the Aryan languages must in their earliest forms have spread from some geographical centre. That centre, however, is no longer sought for in Asia, but in some part of Europe, so that we can no longer speak of any detachment of Aryan-speaking peoples entering Europe. The most important works, summarizing the labours of a host of specialists on the races of Europe, are those of Ripley and Deniker. Founding upon a great multitude of data that have been collected with regard to the form of the head, face and nose, height, and colour of the hair and eyes, most of the leading anthropologists seem to have come to the conclusion that there are three great racial types variously and intricately intermingled in Europe. As described and named by Ripley, these are: (1) the Teutonic, characterized by long head and face and narrow aquiline nose, high stature, very light hair and blue eyes; (2) the Alpine, characterized by round head, broad face, variable rather broad heavy nose, medium height and "stocky" frame, light chestnut hair and hazel grey eyes; and (3) the Mediterranean, characterized by long head and face, rather broad nose, medium stature and slender build, dark brown or black hair and dark eyes. The Teutonic race is entirely confined to northwestern Europe, and embraces some groups speaking Celtic languages. It is believed by Ripley to have been differentiated in this continent, and to have originally been one with the other long-headed race, sometimes known as the Iberian, and to the Italians as the Ligurian race, which "prevails everywhere south of the Pyrenees, along the southern coast of France, and in southern Italy, including Sicily and Sardinia," and which extends beyond the confines of Europe into Africa. The Alpine race is geographically intermediate between these two, having its-centre in the Alps, while in western Europe it is spread most widely over the more elevated regions, and in eastern Europe "becomes less pure in proportion as we go east from the Carpathians across the great plains of European Russia." This last race, which is most persistently characterized by the shape of the head, is regarded by Ripley as an intrusive Asiatic element which once advanced as a wedge amongst the earlier long-headed population as far as Brittany, where it still survives in relative purity, and even into Great Britain, though not Ireland, but afterwards retired and contracted its area before an advance of the long-headed races. Deniker, basing his classification on essentially the same data as Ripley and others, while agreeing with them almost entirely with regard to the distribution of the three main traits (cephalic index, colour of hair and eyes, and stature) on which anthropologists rely, yet proceeds further in the subdivision of the races of Europe. He recognizes six principal and four secondary races. The six principal races are the Nordic (answering approximately to the Teutonic of Ripley), the Littoral or Atlanto-Mediterranean, the Ibero-Insular, the Oriental, the Adriatic or Dinaric and the Occidental or Cevenole. 1 See bibliography at the end of the article. Language. Although language is no test of race, it is the best evidence for present or past community of social or political life; and nothing is better fitted to give a true impression of the position and relative importance of the peoples of Europe than a survey of their linguistic differences and affinities.? The following table contains the names of the various languages which are still spoken on the continent, as well as of those which, though now extinct, can be clearly traced in other forms. Two asterisks are employed to mark those which are emphatically dead languages, while one indicates those which have a kind of artificial life in ecclesiastical or literary usage. dialects. or ecclesiastical liturgies. Besides all those which are spoken | of the Tagus, where the river marks the frontier, being almost over extensive territories, and some even which are confined without inhabitants, especially on the Spanish side. within very narrow limits, are broken up into several distinct geographically, though we have to look back to the weakness of The greater part of the Italian boundary is very clearly marked divided Italy to account for the instances in which northern mountaineers have pushed their way into southern Alpine valleys. Even in these parts, however, there are interesting illustrations of geothe northern ends of the Lago Maggiore and the Lake of Garda, graphical influence in the way in which the Italian boundary crosses and cuts off portions of Lake Lugano both in the east and west. In all these cases the frontier crosses from one steep unpeopled slope to another, assigning the population at different ends or on different sides of the lakes to the country to which belongs the adjacent population not lying on their shores. boundaries. The boundaries of European countries have of course been determined by history, and in some cases only historical events can be held to account for their general situation, Political the influence of geographical conditions being seen only on a minute examination of details. In most cases, however, it is otherwise. The present political boundaries were all settled when the general distribution of population in the continent was in a large measure determined by the geographical conditions, and accordingly the lines along which they run for the most part show the influence of such conditions very clearly, and thus present in many cases a marked contrast to the political boundaries in America and Australia, where the boundaries have often been marked out in advance of the population. In Europe the general rule is that the boundaries tend to run through some thinly peopled strip or tract of country, such as is formed by mountain ranges, elevated tablelands too bleak for cultivation, relatively high ground of no great altitude where soil and climate are less favourable to cultivation than the lower land on either side, or low ground occupied by heaths or marshes or some other sterile soil; but it is the exception for important navigable rivers to form boundaries between countries or even between important administrative divisions of countries, and for such exceptions a special explanation can generally be found. Navigable rivers unite rather than separate, for the obvious reason that they generally flow through populous valleys, and the vessels that pass up and down can touch as easily on one side as the other. Minor rivers, on the other hand, flowing through sparsely peopled valleys frequently form portions of political boundaries simply because they are convenient lines of demarcation. A brief examination of the present political map of Europe will serve to illustrate these rules. The eastern frontier of the Netherlands begins by running southwards through a marsh nearly parallel to the Ems but nowhere touching it, then winds south or south-westwards through a rather sparsely peopled district to the Rhine. This river it crosses. It then approaches but does not touch the Meuse, but runs for a considerable distance roughly parallel to that river along higher ground, where the population is much more scanty_than in the valley. On the side of Belgium the Dutch boundary is for the most part thoroughly typical, winding between the dreariest parts of the Dutch or Belgium provinces of North Brabant, Limburg and Antwerp. The Scheldt nowhere forms a boundary between countries, not even at its wide estuary. The eastern frontier of Belgium is quite typical both on the side of Germany and Luxemburg. It is otherwise, however, on the south, there that country confines with France, and indeed the whole of the north-east frontier of France may be called a historical frontier, showing the influence of geographical conditions only in details. One of these details, however, deserves attention, the tongue in which it advances northwards into Belgium so as to give to France the natural fortress of Givet, a tongue, be it noted, the outline of which is as typical a boundary as is to be seen in Europe in respect of scantiness of population, apart from the fortress. The mountainous frontiers of France on the east and south require hardly any comment. Only in the Burgundy Gate between the Vosges and the Jura has an artificial boundary had to be drawn, and even that in a minor degree illustrates the general rule. The division of the Iberian peninsula between Spain and Portugal goes back in effect to the Christian reaction against the Moors. The valley of the Miño and its tributaries establishes a natural connexion between Galicia and the rest of Spain; but an independent crusade against the Moors starting from the lower part of the valley of the Douro resulted in the formation of the kingdom of Portugal, which found its natural eastern limit on the scantily peopled margin of the Iberian tableland, where the rivers cease to be navigable and flow through narrow gorges, that Of the Swiss frontiers all that it is necessary to remark is that the river Rhine in more than one place marks the boundary, in one, however, where it traverses alluvial flats liable to inundation (on the side of Austria), in the other place where it rushes through a gorge almost throughout typical, the northern is the sea, except where a below the falls of Schaffhausen. The southern frontier of Germany is really artificial boundary runs through Jutland. In the east of Germany and the north-east of Austria the winding but in spite of the absence of marked physical features it is for the frontier through low plains is the result of the partition of Poland, most part in its details almost as typical as the mountainous frontier on the south of Germany. All the great rivers are crossed. Most of the line runs through a tract of strikingly scanty population, and the dense population in one part of it, where upper Silesia confines with Russian Poland, has been developed since the boundary was fixed. Balkans do not, and the Danube to a large extent does form a In the Balkan Peninsula the most striking facts are that the boundary. Geographical features, however, bring the valley of the Maritsa (eastern Rumelia) into intimate relation with upper Bulgaria, the connexion of which with Bulgaria north of the Balkans had long On the side of Rumania, again, it is the marshes on the left bank been established by the valley of the Isker, narrow as that valley is. of the Danube even more than the river itself that make of that river a frontier. An examination of the eastern boundary of all that is included in Russia in Europe will furnish further illustrations of the general rule. Tornea and the Tana should be taken as lines of demarcation in Finally, on the north-west of Russia it was only natural that the that thinly peopled region, and it was equally natural that where the Countries. Austria-Hungary Belgium 97 Denmark (6) 11,373 147 France 15,431 1,980 6,694 18 589 2,185 207,206 Monaco 38,3437 2,465 14 160 8 38,596 14 186 15 13 56,345 26 Greece 1,003 270 Italy 24.974 2,1878 237 18 247 San Marino 110,676 28,460 2 Montenegro 23 :: 2,434 15 32,450 14 97 293 II 17 435 Netherlands 3.500 228 15 65 400 34.347 4,160 4 4,660 50,588 5.423 18 153 5.913 7 117 103,671 13 53 18,762 2,555 "1 18 1,908 $ 2,494 18 191,994 16,432 133 17,2629 18,618 16 97 Sweden Norway 175 5 173.968 4,566 29 4.785 Switzerland 126,053 2,0017 Turkey (Europe)() 15,976 2,846 2,231 16 18 2,933 10 Bulgaria ( 66,840 3,314 is 207 5,892 ? 90 37.323 2,008 2 3,328 3.733 14 100 304 18 12? 41,455 14 91 79 341 boundary between Norway and Sweden descends from the fjeld in the south it should leave to Norway both sides of the valley of the Glommen. The preceding table shows the area of the countries of Europe, with their estimated or enumerated populations in Population. thousands (oco omitted) at different dates. A noteworthy feature of the distribution of population in Europe, especially in western, southern and central Europe, in modern times, is the high degree of aggregation in towns, which is exhibited in the following table for the different countries or regions of the continent: Percentage in Towns. Hull (1901) 241 Toulouse (1896) 134 Nottingham (1901) 240 Nantes (1901) 133 Hanover (1900) 237 Kazan (1897). 132 Norway Genoa (comm., 1901) 235 Malaga (1900) 130 Sweden Magdeburg (1900) 230 Havre (1901) 130 Christiania (1900) 226 Blackburn (1901) 128 German Empire The Hague (1902) 222 Brunswick (1900) 128 Roubaix-Tourcoing (1901) 220 Ekaterinoslav (1897) 121 30.6 Düsseldorf (1900) 214 Valencia (1900). 214 Essen (1900) 119 Spain and Portugal Florence (comm., 1901) 205 Posen (1900) 117 Leicester (1901) 212 Preston (1901) 113 Lille (1901) 113 Chemnitz (1900) 207 Norwich (1901). 112 Galicia and Bukovina. Murcia (1900) 112 Cis-Leithan provinces of Birkenhead (1901) III Austria (exclusive of the Königsberg (1900) 188 Athens (1896) Triest (1900) 179 Tula (1897) Poland 10.6 4.2 14.8 Plymouth-Devonport Brünn (1900) 110 (1901) 177 Kishinev (1897) 109 Moscow region'. Black earth governments, Kharkov (1897) Stuttgart (1900) 176 Basel (comm., 1900) 109 174 Utrecht (1902) 109 Great Russia'. Governments of middle and Bolton (1901) 168 Kiel (1900) 108 Oporto (1900) 168 Reims (1901) 108 lower Volga Cardiff (1901) 164 Krefeld (1900) 107 South Russia Bremen (1900) 163 Derby (1901) 106 Kassel (1900) 106 Dundee (1901) 161 Halifax (1901) 105 The following table contains a list of the towns with more than 100,000 inhabitants, not in every case according to the most recent census, but, in order to make the populations fairly comparable with one another, according to the nearest census or available estimate to 1900. Population in thousands (000 omitted): London (Greater, 1901) 6581 Vilna (1897) 160 Nice (1901) 105 Brighton-Hove (1901) 160 Southampton (1901) Lemberg (1900) Liége (1901) 160 Szeged (1900) 103 Halle a S. (1900) 157 Toulon (1901) 102 153 Cartagena (1900) 100 Comm. commune. w. subs. with suburbs. AUTHORITIES.-Elisée Reclus, vols. i. to v. of Nouvelle Géographie universelle (Paris, 1876-1880), translated by E. G. Ravenstein and A. H. Keane (vol. i. Southern Europe, vol. ii. France and Switzerland, 540 vol. iii. Austria-Hungary, Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands, vol. iv. The British Isles, vol. v. Scandinavia, Russia in Europe, 500 and the European islands, translation undated); G. G. Chisholm, Europe" (2 vols.) in Stanford's Compendium of Geography and Travel (London, 1899, 1902); Kirchhoff and others, Die Länderkunde des Erdteils Europa, vols. ii. and iii. of Unser Wissen von der Erde (comprising all the countries of Europe except Russia) (Vienna, &c., 1887-1893); A. Philippson and L. Neumann, Europa, eine allge meine Länderkunde (Leipzig, 1895, 2nd edition by A. Philippson, 455 1906); Joseph Partsch, Central Europe (London, 1903) (embraces 444 Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Rumania, Servia, Bulgaria and Montenegro treated from a general point of 405 view); Joseph Partsch, Mitteleuropa (Gotha, 1904) (the same work 395 in German, extended and furnished with additional coloured maps); 393 M. Fallex and A. Moirey, L'Europe moins la France (Paris, 1906) 381 (no index); A. Hettner, Europa (Leipzig, 1907) (an important 373 feature of this work is the division of Europe into natural regions); Vidal de la Blache, Tableau de la géographie de la France (Paris, 1903) (contains a most instructive map embracing western and central Europe to about 42° N. and 24°-26° E., showing the former extent of forest, the distribution of soils earliest fit for cultivation, of littoral alluvium and of the mines of salt and tin which were so important in early European commerce); H. B. George, The Relations of Geography and History (Oxford, 1901) (deals very largely 423 372 356 Taken from a paper by Professor Voeikov on "Verteilung der Bevölkerung auf der Erde unter dem Einfluss der Naturverhältnisse und der menschlichen Tätigkeit," in Petermanns Mitteil. (1906), p. 249, where corresponding figures are given for other parts of the world. Kaluga, Smolensk, Tver, Moscow, Yaroslav, Kostromer and Vladimir, Kursk, Orel, Tula, Ryazan, Tambov, Voronezh and Penza. Nizhniy Novgorod, Kazan, Simbirsk, Samara, Saratov and Astrakhan. Bessarabia, Kherson, Taurida, Ekaterinoslav and Don Province. In 1800 only those to which an asterisk is prefixed rose above 100,000. Thirty-four out of the 144 towns enumerated in the list above belong to the British Isles. †The contiguous parliamentary boroughs of Birmingham and Aston Manor. Part of Greater London. |