« السابقةمتابعة »
among all the people, and commanded to put the apostles Jerasalem. riod, 4 Vulgar Æra, forth a little space;
35 And said unto them, Ye men of Israel, take heed to yourselves what ye intend to do as touching these men.
36 For before these days rose up Theudas, boasting himself to be somebody; to whom a number of men, about four hundred, joined themselves : who was slain ; and all, as many as obeyed him, were scattered, and brought to nought.
37 After this man rose up Judas of Galilee, in the
days of the taxing, and drew away much people after
him: he also perished ; and all, even as many as obeyed
him, were dispersed.
38 And now I say unto you, Refrain from these men,
and let them alone; for if this counsel or this work be of
men, it will come to nought":
· 39 But if it be of God, ye cannot overthrow it ; lest.
haply ye be found even to fight against God.
40 And to him they agreed: and when they had called
the apostles, and beaten them, they commanded that they
should not speak in the name of Jesus, and let them go.
41 And they departed from the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were counted worthy to suffer sbame for his name.
42 And daily in the temple, and in every house, they. ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ.
The appointment of seven Deacons.
ACTs vi. 1-6.
1 And in those days, when the number of the disciples
Old died, the honour of the law failed, and purity and Phari.
saism died.” He is called Rabban Gamaliel the old, to distin-
guish bim from his grandson, who was also called Rabban Gama-
liel, and the great-grandson of this grandson, who was also
called by the same name, and had the same title, and were both
of them, as the Talmudists say, presidents also of the council.
They tell us that Rabban Gamaliel the old died eighteen
years before the destruction of Jerusalem (a), that is, in the year
ofour Lord 52, about eighteen years after the convention of the
council, before whom the apostles were brought, as related in
the Acts. We read also in Josephus of Simeon, the son of this
Gamaliel, as being one of the principal persons of the Jewish
nation about three years before the destruction of Jerusalem.
(u) The Talmudists say, he succeeded his father, and was president of the council. See Biscoe on the Acts, vol. ii. p. 220.
29 It was a common saying among the Jews, OVxyv nyy 52 Sapnas 1910 onw, omne consilium, quod ad gloriam Dei suscipitur, prospero eventu gaudebit. --Schoetgen Hor. Heb. vol. i. p. 424.
Jalian Pe. was multiplied, there arose a murmuring of the Grecians Jerusalem. ried, 4745. against the Hebrews, because their widows were negValgarðra,
lected in the daily ministration.
2 Then the twelve called the multitude of the disciples unto them, and said, It is not reason that we should leave the word of God, and serve tables.
3 Wherefore, brethren, look ye out among you seven men of honest report, full of the Holy Ghost, and wisdom, whom we may appoint over this business 30.
50 We now read the first account of the clection of any
order of men in the Christian Church, from among its own
members. The Apostles and the Seventy had been ordained to
their sacred work by their divine Master himself. The in-
creased number of converts now made additional assistance
necessary, and the manner in which the seven were set apart.
deserves both the attention and imitation of every Society
united together in the name of Christ.
It is the misfortune of the Christian Church, that every,
even the most minute point, bas been made the subject of con.
troversy ; we must begin therefore our inquiry into the nature
of the office to which the Seven were appointed, by endeavour-
ing to ascertain from what body of men they were selected,
before they were set apart by the apostles. It has been ques-
tioned whether they were of the seventy-of the hundred and
eight, who, together with the apostles, composed the number of
the hundred and twenty upon whom the Spirit fell at the day of
Pentecost-or, of the general mass of converts, now added to the
Church. Lightfoot (a) supposes them to have been of the hun-
dred and twenty. These he observes were they that were of
Christ's constant retinue, and “ companied with him all the
time that he went in and out among them;" and who, being
constant witnesses of his actions, and auditors of bis doctrine,
were appointed by bim for the ministry. These are they that
the story meaneth all along in these passages, “ They were all
together”_" They went to their company” -“ Look ye out
among yourselves'-" They were all scattered abroad, except
the apostles"-" They which were scattered abroad, preached,"
&c. The Jews say, “ Ezra's great synagogue was of a hundred
and twenty men.” And their canons allow not the setting up of
a Sanhedrim of three and twenty judges in any city, but where
there were a hundred and twenty men fit some for one office
and employment, some for another (b).
If we may give credit to Epiphanus, the seven deacons were
of the number of the Seventy. If this was the case, and if they
had been made partakers of the miraculous gifts, they were al-
ready invested with the power both of preaching and adminis-
tering the sacraments. No imposition of hands therefore was
necessary to set them apart for this office. The fact seems to
be, that the difficulties and embarrassments arising from the
incipient disputes between the widows of the Hellenists and of
the Hebrews, might have increased so much, and excited so
much dissension and unkindness, that it became necessary to
select some of the next rank to the apostles, and appoint them
for this express purpose. The general opinion however is, that
the deacons were chosen from among the general mass of be-
The second and the following verses are thus paraphrased by Hammond-And the twelve apostles calling the Church toge. ther, said unto them, we have resolved, or decreed, that it is no.
Julian Pe. 4 But we will give ourselves continually to prayer, and Jerusalem.
riod, 4745. to the ministry of the word :
way fit or reasonable, that we should peglect the preaching of
the Gospel, and undertake the care of looking to the poor,
Therefore do you nominate to as seven men, faithful and
trusty persons, the most eminent of the believers among you;
that we may consecrate or ordain them to this office of deacons
in the Church ; and intrust them with the task of distributing
to them tbat want, out of the stock of the Church : and in the
choice of them let it be also observed, that they be persons of
eminent gifts, and knowledge in divine matters, (see ver. 10.)
who consequently may be fit to be employed by us in preaching
the word, and receiving proselytes to the faith by baptism.
(Chap. viii, 5. 12.)
And by that means we shall be less disturbed, or interrupted, in our daily employment of praying and preaching the Gospel.
The general opinion, as it is bere expressed by Hammond, certainly is, that the deacons were selected from among the mass of believers; and that the Greek words to infog twv uaintūv, bere rendered the multitude of the disciples, refers to the community or society of Christians, called sometimes távtes, the All, (i Tim. v. 20.) #leioves, the many, (2 Cor. ji. 6.) and sometimes xpislávou, Christians, or followers of Christ; and also Matt. xviii. 17. Eritiuca O návrwv Thatóvwv, before the Churcb.
From whatever body of men the deacons were selected, the narrative before us informs us of two important facts. The utmost caution was used on the part of the apostles. to prevent the admission of inferior or unworthy men into the offices of the Christian Church. The apostles, the heads of the Church, prescribed the qualifications for the office, the people chose the persons who were thus worthy, and the apostles ordained them to the appointed office. Every Church we infer, therefore, is entitled, and is bound to follow this plan of conduct. Its ecclesiastical heads are the sole judges and directors of the qualifications required for the fulfilment of any sacred office; the persons who are to fill those offices must be taken from the general mass of the people, and they are then, when thus known and approved, to be set apart by prayer, and laying on of the hands of those to whom that power is rightly committed. Till they are thus set a part, their own qualifications, and the general approbation of the people, do not constitute their right of admission to the offices of the Christian Church. If Scripture is to be our guide in matters which concern Christian societies, as well as in those which interest us as individuals, these are the directions it has for ever given to the Churcbes of Christ, in every nation, wberever its sacred pages have been imparted. The apostles alone called the Church together, and gave them directions to look out from among them seven men of good report, specifying at the same time their necessary endowments and numbers; and reserving to themselves the power of appointing them to the sacred office. And when we consider that the gifts of the Holy Ghost were one indispensable qualification, and may be regarded as the præelection to some sacred function : no possible authority can be derived from this portion of Scripture to sanction the laity in taking upon themselves the choice and appointmeut of their respective ministers. The same rules which were on the present occasion prescribed, we have reason to suppose, were observed likewise in the nomination of bishops and deacons in other Churches. For in St. Paul's Epistle to Timothy and Titus, we read he desires the bishop who ordains, to inquire most parti.
Julian Pe- 5 And the saying pleased the whole multitude: and Jerusalem.
cularly into the character of those who were admitted into the
bigh sacred functions. In Titus (i. 6.) for a bishop, seventeen
necessary qualifications are enumerated ; and in Timothy (iii.
2.) filteen. The same inquiries and the same discipline (com-
pare ver. 6 and 10.) although the former are not so particularly
specified, are also required before the election of deacons.
(i Tim. iii. 8.) Tbey, says the apostle, that have used the office
of a deacon well, purchase to themselves a good degree, that is,
a degree towards the order of Presbyter.
We are now to inquire into the nature and extent of the dea.
copal office. If we refer to the Scripture on this subject, we
find that Philip, one of the deacons, preached and baptized,
(Acts xxi. 8. and viii. 12. 29. 40.); and that St. Stephen also, who
was another, preached, and did great wonders and miracles
among the people, (Acts vi. 8–10.); and they were not able to
resist the wisdom and the spirit by wbich be spake. Whether
Philip and others of these deacons preached and baptized, not
in their character of deacons, but as Evangelists, or as belong-
ing to the Seventy, has been a subject of dispute. It is clear
that before their ordination the apostles themselves were en-
gaged in the ministry of the tables, for the treasure of the
Church being laid at the apostles' feet, distribution of it was
made to every man according as be had need, (Acts iv. 35.)
That work, therefore, which the apostles tbemselves performed,
till an increase of duties compelled them to appoint others to
officiate for them, cannot in any way be regarded as inconsis.
tent with the bigh commission which tbey received to teach and
to baptize all nations. The office of the deacon is mentioned by
St. Paul in bis Epistle to the Philippians, as a spiritual and
perpetual office, then settled in tbe Church, they being the ap-
pointed attendants on the bishop, as we read in Epiphanius (6)
A bishop cannot be without a deacon. Throughout the whole
bistory of the Acts of tbe Apostles they are vever once called
Ministers of the Tables, although they are said to be appointed
for that work-po other name is given to them but that of dea-
cons; and St. Jerome (To. 5. F 251. K.) speaks of them as the
ministers not only of the priests, but also of widows and tables.
And when it is remembered that the gifts of the Holy Spirit
were particularly conferred upon them, the order of deacons,
like that of the apostles, may be considered of divine instilus
tion, and decidedly ecclesiastical, established for ever in the
The evidence of the Fathers is no less clear; their writings
are to be valued not only for their testimony to the opinions of
the Primitive Church, but for their statements of facts. The
customs of the cotemporaries of the apostles, or their successors
in the next age, when those customs were universal in every
couptry where Christianity was established, are related by the
Fathers : and they have ever been esteemed therefore as useful
chroniclers, and as our best guides in all questions concerning
the faith or discipline of the early Church When the Fathers
are unanimous in asserting the prevalence of a custom in tbe
day in which they lived; when they describe it as universal ;
when they declare it to have prevailed in the age of the apostles;
and when their testimony is confirmed either by the positive
affirmation of Scripture, or is alluded to in Scripture, or is
supported by rational inference from the language of Scripture,
we are justified in pronouncing such opinion, custom, or prac-
tice, to have been either instituted, or at least sanctioned by the
apostles. If there be any thing of a doubtful nature in the pas-
Julian Pe- they chose Stephen, a man full of faith and of the Holy Jerusale
32. sages of Scripture, which relate the opinion or practice in ques-
tion, the corroborating evidence of the Fathers must be consi.
dered as decisive of any discussion arising from the subject.
This authority of the primitive Fathers will enable us to ascer-
tain the real nature of the Diaconate which was now instituted,
and became an ordinance for ever in the Christian Church.
In answer to those who consider that the order of deacons is
only a temporary or civil office, instituted for the serving of
tables, it must be urged, as Bishop Pearson (c) rightly observes,
that the tables of the apostles were common and sacred. Justin
Martyr(d) mentions them as attendants on the bishops at the
Agapæ, or love feasts, when the Eucharist was also celebrated ;
and that they distributed the bread and wine (aller its conse-
cration by the bishop,) to tbe communicants present, and car-
ried them likewise to those who were absent. St. Polycarp (e),
in his Epistle to the Philippians, (p. 17. edit. Oxon. 1644.) ex-
horts the deacons to behave tbemselves unblameably as the dea-
cons or ministers of God in Cbrist, and not of men. St. Igna-
tius (f ) also, in his Epistle to the Trallians, has these words:-
“ And deacons, being the ministers of the mystery, or rather
of the mysteries, of Jesus Christ, ought by all means to please all
men, for they are not dispensers of meat and drink, but ministers
of the Church of God.” St. Cyprian (9) writes (Epist. 65. Ord.
Pamel.) “ But deacons ought to remember, that the Lord chose
apostles, that is, bishops and governors; but after the Lord's
ascension into heaven, the apostles constituted deacons for
themselves, to be attendants upon them as bishops, and upon
Many other similar references might be given ; but it is only
necessary bere to add, they were ordained by the imposition of
hands by the apostles, in the very same manner as priests were
ordained ; and that this solemn ceremony could not have been
used, had the deacons been designed only for civil and tempo.
Mosheim has endeavoured to shew that the seven deacons
were got the only persons appointed by the apostles to take
charge of the poor, as there must have been curators for that
office long before this period, in consequence of the increasing
numbers of the Church; and there must, therefore, in fact, have
been deacons before there were any such by name. He argues,
these ministers having been selected from amongst the indige-
nous Jews, who in number far exceeded the foreign ones, it was
found that they were not strictly impartial, but were apt to lean
a little more than was right in favour of their fellow citizens,
and those of their own country, and discovered a greater readi-
ness in relieving the widows of native Jews than the others.
The foreign Jews, whom St. Luke terms Greeks, being mich
dissatisfied at this, and murmuring greatly against the Hebrews
on account thereof, the apostles convoked the members of the
Church, and commanded them to nominate seven men of ap.
proved faith and integrity, to whom the management of the
concerns of the people might without apprehension be commit-
ted. The people complied with these directions, and chose by
their suffrages the appointed number of men, six of them being
Jews by birth, and one a proselyte, of the name of Nicolaus.
These seven deacons, as we commonly call them, were all of them
chosen from amongst the foreigu Jews. This be thinks is suffi.
cienllyevident, from the circumstance of their names being all of
them Greek : for the Jews of Palestine were not accustomed to