St. Brit. Laws, statutes, etc., Work- men's EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY UNDER THE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT, 1897, AND THE EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ACT, 1880. BY ARTHUR ROBINSON, B.A., BARRISTER-AT-LAW Of the Middle Temple and North Eastern Circuit; late Scholar of Jesus College, LONDON: STEVENS AND SONS, LIMITED, 119 & 120, CHANCERY LANE, Law Publishers. 1898. いく 3577R PREFACE. In this little book the author has attempted to deal with the liability of employers under the Employers' Liability Act, 1880, and the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1897. The book commences with a short summary of the law, then follow the two Acts, which are dealt with section by section, and the conclusion is devoted to the common law defences to actions under the Employers' Liability Act. It is hoped that this arrangement will prove useful. December, 1897. CONTENTS. APPENDICES. - . 115 TABLE OF CASES. Amos v. Duffy, 6 T. L. R. 339 Armstrong v. S. E. R., 11 Jurist, 758 Bacon v. Davis, 3 T. L. R. 557 Baddeley v. Earl Granville, 19 Q. B. D. 423; 56 L. J. Q. B. 501; 57 L. T. 268; 36 W. R. 63; 51 J. P. 822 Balleny v. Cree, 11 Sc. Sess. Cas. 3rd ser. 626 Barber v. Burt, 10 T. L. R. 383 Baxter v. Wyman, 4 T. L. R. 255 PAGE - 77 100 48 78 6 53 48 90 Bayley v. Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Rail. Co., Blake v. Midland Rail. Co., 18 Q. B. 93 ; 21 L. J. Q. B. 233 ; Bourke v. Cork and Macroom Rail. Co., 4 L. R. Ir. 682 Bramall v. Lees, 29 L. T. (O. S.) 111 Brannigan v. Robinson, (1892) 1 Q. B. 344; 61 L. J. Q. B. 202; 66 L. T. 647; 56 J. P. 328 Bromley v. Cavendish Spinning Co., 2 T. L. R. 881 Bunker v. Midland Rail. Co., 47 L. T. 476; 31 W. R. 231 53 |