صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني

Gt. Brit. Laws, statutes, etc. Worka
compensation

law,

men's

EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY

ct 댜

UNDER THE

WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT, 1897,

AND THE

EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ACT, 1880.

BY

ARTHUR ROBINSON, B.A.,

BARRISTER-AT-LAW

Of the Middle Temple and North Eastern Circuit; late Scholar of Jesus College,
Cambridge ; one of the Examiners of the High Court of Justice ; and

Author of The Law Relating to Income Tax.

LONDON:

STEVENS AND SONS, LIMITED,
119 & 120, CHANCERY LANE,

Law Publishers.

いく
3577R

1898.

E?

[blocks in formation]

PRINTED BY C. F. ROWORTH, GREAT NEW STREET, FETTER LANE, E.C.

PREFACE.

In this little book the author has attempted to deal with the liability of employers under the Employers' Liability Act, 1880, and the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1897. The book commences with a short summary of the law, then follow the two Acts, which are dealt with section by section, and the conclusion is devoted to the common law defences to actions under the Employers' Liability Act. It is hoped that this arrangement will prove useful.

December, 1897.

TABLE OF CASES.

PAGE Amos v. Duffy, 6 T. L. R. 339

- 77 Armstrong v. S. E. R., 11 Jurist, 758

- 100 Bacon v. Davis, 3 T. L. R. 557

48 Baddeley v. Earl Granville, 19 Q. B. D. 423; 56 L. J.Q. B. 501; 57 L. T. 268; 36 W. R. 63; 51 J. P. 822

78 Balleny v. Cree, 11 Sc. Sess. Cas. 3rd ser. 626

6 Barber v. Burt, 10 T. L. R. 383

53 Baxter v. Wyman, 4 T. L. R. 255

48 Bayley v. Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Rail. Co., 8 C. P. 148; 42 L. J. C. P. 78; 28 L. T. 366

90 Beckett v. Corporation of Manchester, 52 J. P. 346

65 Bird v. G. N. R., 28 L. J. Ex. 3

112 Blake v. Midland Rail. Co., 18 Q. B. 93 ; 21 L. J. Q. B. 233; 16 Jurist, 562

100 Bortick, v. Head, Wrightson, & Co., 53 L. T. 909 ; 34 W. R. 102; 50 J. P. 327; 2 T. L. R. 103

60 Bound v. Lawrence, (1892) 1 Q. B. 226; 61 L. J. M. C. 21; 65 L. T. 844; 40 W. R. 1 ; 56 J. P. 118

69 Bourke v. Cork and Macroom Rail. Co., 4 L. R. Ir. 682 99 Bradburn v. G. W. R., 10 L. R. Ex. 1; 44 L. J. Ex. 9; 31 L. T. 464 ; 23 W. R. 468

100 Bramall v. Lees, 29 L. T. (O. S.) 111

99 Brannigan v. Robinson, (1892) 1 Q. B. 344; 61 L. J. Q. B. 202; 66 L. T. 647; 56 J. P. 328

51 Bromley v. Cavendish Spinning Co., 2 T. L. R. 881

47 Brooke v. Ramsden, 63 L. T. 287; 53 J. P. 262

80 Brown v. Butterley, 53 L. T. 964 ; 50 J. P. 230; 2 T. L. R. 159

91 Bunker v. Midland Rail. Co., 47 L. T. 476; 31 W. R. 231 53 Butler v. Birnbaum, 7 T. L. R. 287

49 Byrne v. Boadle, 2 H. & C. 722; 33 L. J. Ex. 13; 9 L. T. 450; 12 W. R. 279

111

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
« السابقةمتابعة »