All England Law Reports Annotated, المجلد 4Butterworth., 1938 "All England law reports noted against Halsbury's Laws of England:" table pub. Oct. 23 and Dec. 4, 1952, and therafter in the 1st Report of each month. Cf. Announcement, Oct. 23, 1952. |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-3 من 85
الصفحة 10
... contended - and contended with success - that the G order of June 4 , 1937 , operated to transfer to the respondents the contract of service that the appellant had made with the Hickleton Main Colliery Co. , Ltd. The respondents further ...
... contended - and contended with success - that the G order of June 4 , 1937 , operated to transfer to the respondents the contract of service that the appellant had made with the Hickleton Main Colliery Co. , Ltd. The respondents further ...
الصفحة 185
... contending that this payment was out of time , the corporation demanded payment of the difference between the full amount of the rate and the compounded amount . on A On behalf of the appellants , it was contended that the words the ...
... contending that this payment was out of time , the corporation demanded payment of the difference between the full amount of the rate and the compounded amount . on A On behalf of the appellants , it was contended that the words the ...
الصفحة 399
... contended that the limit of 3 years provided by sect . 10 of the Act applied G both to a claim for infringement under sect . 6 and to a claim for con- version under sect . 7. Thirdly , they contended that the conversion was the printing ...
... contended that the limit of 3 years provided by sect . 10 of the Act applied G both to a claim for infringement under sect . 6 and to a claim for con- version under sect . 7. Thirdly , they contended that the conversion was the printing ...
طبعات أخرى - عرض جميع المقتطفات
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
27 Digest 34 Digest action agents agree amount appellant company appellants applied argument arises authorised authority Barrister-at-Law breach certificate cheque circumstances claim clause common lodging-house construction contended contract Corpn corporation costs Court of Appeal damages debts decision defendants Digest Supp dismissed divorce duty EDITORIAL NOTE entitled estoppel evidence fact given grid bias ground Hailsham Edn HALSBURY held holy table House of Lords husband income infringement Inland Revenue interest intestacy judge judgment Kerwood KING'S BENCH DIVISION land lease liability licensed LORD marriage matter ment mortgage notice opinion paid parties patent payable payment period person pesetas petition plaintiff premises present proceedings purpose question reason referred regard respect respondents rule rule against perpetuities Sched sect Solicitors statement of claim statute statutory subsidiary companies Tax Cas tenant testator trade trust wife words