The American State Reports: Containing the Cases of General Value and Authority Subsequent to Those Contained in the "American Decisions" [1760-1869] and the "American Reports" [1869-1887] Decided in the Courts of Last Resort of the Several States [1886-1911], المجلد 125Abraham Clark Freeman Bancroft-Whitney Company, 1909 |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-5 من 100
الصفحة 11
... Negligence Wills ... 152 Mich . 693 ... 427 15 N. D. 618 ... 620 ... 146 N. C. 25 .... 466 ..Certiorari ..... .Forged Check .. 15 N. D. 299 ... 588 .Wills 28 R. I. 523 ... 759 28 R. I. 360 .... 743 · 62 W. Va . 521 .. 986 21 Bice v ...
... Negligence Wills ... 152 Mich . 693 ... 427 15 N. D. 618 ... 620 ... 146 N. C. 25 .... 466 ..Certiorari ..... .Forged Check .. 15 N. D. 299 ... 588 .Wills 28 R. I. 523 ... 759 28 R. I. 360 .... 743 · 62 W. Va . 521 .. 986 21 Bice v ...
الصفحة 13
... Negligence .136 Iowa , 302 ... 254 ..... .... .... 47 Wash . 253 .. 904 78 Ohio St.309 . 699 Miller v . Mayor of Birmingham..Jury Trial . 151 Ala . 469 .... 31 Milton v . Bangor Ry . etc. Co ...... Negligence .... 103 Me . 218 .... 293 ...
... Negligence .136 Iowa , 302 ... 254 ..... .... .... 47 Wash . 253 .. 904 78 Ohio St.309 . 699 Miller v . Mayor of Birmingham..Jury Trial . 151 Ala . 469 .... 31 Milton v . Bangor Ry . etc. Co ...... Negligence .... 103 Me . 218 .... 293 ...
الصفحة 68
... Negligence of , Prima Facie Evidence of . - A pas- senger makes out a prima facie case against a carrier when he shows that he was injured by an accident happening to the train in which he was riding in the course of its operation by ...
... Negligence of , Prima Facie Evidence of . - A pas- senger makes out a prima facie case against a carrier when he shows that he was injured by an accident happening to the train in which he was riding in the course of its operation by ...
الصفحة 70
... negligence on the part of the carrier , in the operation of the train , and the burden is then thrown on it to show that the injury sustained by plaintiff was without negligence on its part . This has been the rule in this state for ...
... negligence on the part of the carrier , in the operation of the train , and the burden is then thrown on it to show that the injury sustained by plaintiff was without negligence on its part . This has been the rule in this state for ...
الصفحة 71
... negligence of the defendant , and the burden of proving that there has been no negligence is cast upon the defendant . " Complaint is made that this instruction incorrectly declares the rule as to the burden of proof , the position of ...
... negligence of the defendant , and the burden of proving that there has been no negligence is cast upon the defendant . " Complaint is made that this instruction incorrectly declares the rule as to the burden of proof , the position of ...
طبعات أخرى - عرض جميع المقتطفات
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
admissible adverse possession alleged amount appellant applied attorney authority Bank bona fide purchaser breach carrier cause of action claim common carrier constitution contract contributory negligence corporation covenant of seisin damages death deceased decree deed defendant defendant's divorce dollars duty easement entitled evidence exercise fact fendant fraud granted held injury Iowa issue judgment jurisdiction jury land liable mandamus Mass ment Minn mortgage N. Y. Supp negligence negotiable negotiable instrument notice Ohio St opinion owner paid parties passenger payment person plaintiff plaintiff in error possession proceedings promissory note provision purchaser purpose question quo warranto railroad reason recover refused respondent rule statute statute of frauds statute of limitations street sustained testator thereof tion valid verdict void writ
مقاطع مشهورة
الصفحة 885 - The question always is, was there an unbroken connection between the wrongful act and the injury, — a continuous operation? Did the facts constitute a continuous succession of events, so linked together as to make a natural whole, or was there some new and independent cause intervening between the wrong and the injury?
الصفحة 771 - ... or by another will or codicil executed in manner hereinbefore required, or by some writing declaring an intention to revoke the same, and executed in the manner in which a will is hereinbefore required to be executed, or by the burning, tearing, or otherwise destroying the same by the testator, or by some person in his presence and by his direction, with the intention of revoking the same.
الصفحة 156 - ... 1. At a fixed period after date or sight ; or 2. On or before a fixed or determinable future time specified therein; or 3. On or at a fixed period after the occurrence of a specified event, which is certain to happen, though the time of happening be uncertain. An instrument payable upon a contingency is not negotiable, and the happening of the event does not cure the defect.
الصفحة 597 - This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it does not state a cause of action.
الصفحة 423 - Should the Contractor at any time refuse or neglect to supply a sufficiency of properly skilled workmen, or of materials of the proper quality, or fail in any respect to prosecute the work wIth promptness and diligence, or fail in the performance of any of the agreements herein contained, such refusal, neglect or failure being certified by the Architects, the Owner shall be at liberty, after three days...
الصفحة 399 - ... and signed by the party to be charged thereby, or by some person thereunto by him lawfully authorized.
الصفحة 200 - An instrument which contains an order or promise to do any act in addition to the payment of money is not negotiable. But the negotiable character of an instrument otherwise negotiable is not affected by a provision which — 1. Authorizes the sale of collateral securities in case the instrument be not paid at maturity; or 2.
الصفحة 507 - It is not by the office of the person to whom the writ is directed, but the nature of the thing to be done that the propriety or impropriety of issuing a mandamus, is to be determined.
الصفحة 180 - The true rule is, that what is the proximate cause of an injury is ordinarily a question for the jury. It is not a question of science or of legal knowledge. It is to be determined as a fact, in view of the circumstances of fact attending it.
الصفحة 771 - That no Will or Codicil, or any Part thereof, shall be revoked otherwise than as aforesaid, or by another Will or Codicil executed in manner herein-before required, or by some Writing declaring an Intention to revoke the same, and executed in the Manner in which a Will is hereinbefore required to be executed...