« السابقةمتابعة »
gement of nice and inattend others printed ed all
Papers relative to the Rupture with Spain. In French and Enge
lish. Published by Authority. 8vo. 3s. Owen. IN the arrangement of thefe Papers, the Editor has shews
1 uncommon negligence and inattention. Some are disposed contrary to their due order, and others printed twice over; so that he fcems industriously to have contributed all in his power to render still more confused and embarrassed, a collection of itself fufficiently perplexed and obscure. ,
As to the matter of these Papers, so far as they relate to the justice of the Spanith Claim to the Newfoundland Fishery, and other demands, we cannot form a clear and precise judga ment, fince many documents feem wanting to connect the chain of Negociaiion on these heads. But lo far as they regard the mode in which the Spanish court preferred their Claim, and their collusive practices with our enemies, they afford the clearest conviction. of a secret compact between them, with a view of forcing us to accede to unequal and disadvantageous terms of peace. Indeed, from the moment that the Spaniards avowed the Memorial so irregularly and insolently presented by the hands of M. Butly, it required no deep political penetration to perceive that their long-concealed jealousy was ripened into professed enmity, and that they only waited a favourable opportunity for an open rupture. The Instruciions of Mr. Pitt, to our Amballador at the Spanish court, relative to this Memorial, are such as not only prove him a spirited patriot, but an able politician. . .
« Although (says he) in the course of this Instruction to your Excellency, I could not, with such an insolent Memorial from France before me, but proceed on the supposition, that, insidious as that court is, the could not dare to commit in such a manner the name of his Catholic Majesty, without being authorized thereto; -I must not, however, conceal from your Excellency, that it is thought posible, here that the court of France, though not wholly unauthorized, may, with her usual artifice in Negociation, have put much exaggeration into this matter : and in case, upon entering into remonstrances on this affair, you shall perceive a disposition in M. Wall to explain away and disavow the authorization of Spain to this offensive transaction of France, and to come to categorical and satisfactory declarations, relatively to the final intentions of Spain, your Excellency will, with readiness, and your usual address, adapt yourself to so desirable a circumitance, and will open to the court of Madrid as handsome a retreat as may be, in cafe you perceive from the Spanisa Mi. mifter that they sincerely with to find one, and to remove, by an effectual satisfaction, the unfavourable impressions, which this Memorial of the court of France has justly and unvoidably made on the mind of his Majesty.". ::
: The judicious, moderate, and politic ftyle of these Instructions, is alone sufficient to refute the enemies of this Minister, who have invidioufly infinuated that he was eager in promoting a War with Spain. If, upon notice of their having signed a secret Treaty with France, he recommended measures, which by the majority were deemed rash and unadviseable, yet the event leaves us room to wish that temerity had prevailed over moderation. Indeed, under the circumstances in which we stood in relation to the Spanish court, who had given the clearest demonstrations of their secret enmity against us, and endeavoured to delude us by temporizing arts, the most effectual method of obtaining a prompt and satisfactory explanation, seems to have been that of making the demand by persons armed with power to resent equivocation and delay immediately.
It does not become us to enquire into the reasons which may have influenced thofe, who preferred the Languor of legatine Negociation, to the more spirited proposal of a naval equipment, which, if it could not have obliged them to have been fincere, would, at least, have compelled them to have been just. But, as such measures were thought most expedient, it would be unjust not to acknowlege, that the disa patches of Lord Egremont on this occasion are precife, animated, and judicious; and afford the most favourable instances of his Lord'hip’s Ministerial talents. The dispatches likewise from Lord Bristol do great honour to that nobleman, who; throughout this nice and difficult part of his Embassy, seems to have conducted himfelf with great vigilance, judgment, and discretion, and to have known the art of relaxing occafionally, without departing from the dignity of his character."
In few words, these Papers bear honourable testimony of the parts and abilities of the several Ministers, whose names are subscribed to them : and such specimens give us strong reason to hope, that, when the blessings of peace shall be reItored, the treaty, which secures that long wished for and desirable end, will free us from the reproach of losing by the pen, what we have won by the sword.
o hope, tv, which from the reprochen
For MARCH, 1762. "?
POLITICAL. :::: :: : Art. 1. Observations on the Papers relative to the Rupture with
Spain, laid before both Houses of Parliament, on Priday, the 29th of January, 1762, by his Majesty's Command. "In a
Letter from a Member of Parliament to a friend in the Coun-' : try: 8vo. 1s. ' Nicoll. THESE Qbservations are many of them very spirited, and some of
them extremely pertinent. The Writer very juftly complains that so much is withteld from our knowlege, that we cannot pretend with Clearness to unravel the thread of the Negociation. Had the Public, he observes, been gratified with a light of the Memorials and Papers, relating tu the Demand of Liberty for the Spanish nation to fish on the Banks of Newfoundland, (a matter held facred) and to the other Claims equally unjuit, made by the Count de Fuentes, we might, with a tolerable degree of accuracy, have known something more of the merits of the present quarrel with Spain. But not one of these, he adds, appears; nor are other Memorials or Papers, which he afterwards takes notice of, to be found in the printed collection. With regard to his comment on those which are publifed, it savours too much of party zeal, and is little more than a professed panegyric on Mr. Pitt, with some obligue sarcasms on his successors in the adminis tration. We cannot, indeed, but applaud the jutt tribute which he pays to Mr. Pict's alive and vigorous administration ; 'but it is not necessary to depreciate his successors, in order to 'extoll him. Perhaps at the time of his resignation, it were to be wished that we might not have run the hazard of a change; hitherto, however, we have had the good fortune to find, that the alteration in the Miniitry has not produced any relaxation of that ardor, activity, and vigilance, to which we nay, attribute all our fuccesses. And the late happy reduction of Martinico, is a proof that victory is not altogether chained to the chariot-wheels of any particular Minister. : 1 Art, 2. A Continuation * of the Address to the City of London,
8vo. 1 s. 6d. R. Davis. : This gentleman gives hard, very hard knocks, and seems deter, mined to follow his blow, Mr. P-; it seems, is to pay lauce, as the phrase is, for his entertainment at Guildhall, at the memorable festival there, in the year 1951. But, a cruce with these dir. agreeable retrospects : why should they interrupt our rejoicings for the conqueft of Martinico ? See the first part, Review for February last, page 149. .
Art. 3. Art. 3. The Rofciad of Covent Garden. By the Author. 410. Art. 5. Ani Epiffle to the Author of the Four Farthing Candles,
- Is. 6 d. Grettón. This unequal imitator of a late celebrated piece, abuses the lower actors of Covent-Garden Theatre, with more than Churchill's ille nature; and praises the better fort with less, far less, than Churchill's Poetry. -He also falls outrageously on the Reviewers; from whence we conclude he has had some former production condemned by them. We wish it were in our power to make him amends on the present occafion; but, in truth, we can neither honestly approve either his subject or his writing : however, it must be acknowleged, he has some good lines; and if, as we conjecture, he is but a stripling in Poetry, here are indications of genius that time may improve into something considerable enough to exempt him from the censure of those fellmonsters the Reviews, of whom he asserts, that they crush the products of each infunt Mule. An infant Muse, however, like other froward brats, may not be the worse for a little proper correction ; although, while smarting under the lash, it mistakenly considers wholesome discipline as unmerited chastisement, and unwarrantable cruelty of which, the Reviewers trust, no juft accusation can be brought against them. But it is not to be expected that those, whose works they difapprove, should ever acquiesce in a judgment given against themselves.
Art. 4. The Four Farthing Candles, a Satire. 4to. Is.
Morley. iii i These Farthing Candles are lighted up to finge the poetic plumes of Messrs. Lloyd, 'Churchill, and Coleman; with whose names the Author has thought proper to join that of Sh-|-y: with what propriety we cannot pretend to say. There are some smart things in his Poem ; but his denying the applauded Author of the Russia, any share of genius, is enough to make every discerning Reader quellian that of our Satyrist himself; or, at lealt, to pronounce him utterly deftitute of candor. Can any thing be more absurd than the following lines, applied to Mr. Churchill?
“ When a rough unweildy wight,
His want of Genius, as of Grace.”
By the Author of the Rosciad of Covent Garden, 4to. , 60, · Nicoll. .
Haft thou not observed, Reader, when the great powers of Europe fignify their hoitile intentions toward each other, and the recruiting parties begin to rattle their drums about the town, how the little grenadiers of every street clap on their paper caps and wooden fwords, mimic the spirit-ftirring Fund with their Bartholomew toys, and strut, and play the hero with almost as good an air as if they were paid eight-pence a day for their performance? In Like manner, when real Poets on any, or on no provocation, bran. dith their adverse pens, and with more than marcial rage, fall to tearing each others laurels from their frowning foreheads, then do the puny witlings and versifiers, with mimic fury, go pell-mell together by their alles-ears, and Fool! Puppy! Coxcomb! Blockhead! are alternately given and received, to convince the laughing by. standers, that if these Poets, or Bards in miniature, have not the genius of a *********, or a ***** *, they can boat, and rave, and rail, and call names, and abuse, as manfully as those who for their fuperior talents, are allowed to take the lead of the mob. But these angry boys, who have the impudence thus to pretend to fquabble and dispute with each other for the Bays, while none of them have any real claim to the smallest sprig, deserve only a good whipping with a bush of nettles; to quiet chem; or, if it should appear thai che idle gentry thus disturb the neighbourhood, for want of some less offens five employment, let them take a hint from the present Epistle, and,
Leaving all poctic ftrains ,
Art. 6. Songs in the new Burletta of Midas. As it is pers
formed at the Theatre-Royal in Crow-ftreet, Dublin. 8vo. 1 s. - London, re-printed by Nicoll.
Whether such phænomena as Oratorios, Operas, Cantatas, Burlettas, &c. can be confidered as accessions to the republic of letters, and whether they merit a place in a literary journal, more than a new magazine or a polite songster, is a disputable point with us. Of this strange droll thing called Midas, we know not what to make, unless, as some thought of the Beggar's Opera, it hus à paíitical meaning. Ay, ay, it must be so. Arrah! ye Irith wags, ye Crow. ftreet Polis ticians, we know well enough whom you mean by your Pan and Sol and Midas and Silenus's wife. But mum.
Art. 7. Horace's first Satire modernized, and addreffed to Jacob
Henriques. 4to.' is. Cooke. This excellent Satire on Inconstancy and Avarice, is here humorously and pleasantly applied to our own times and manners. The infa.