Mephistopheles appears; the doors are burst in by the crowd in pursuit of Faust. The demon gives Faust a book, and this book carries him away through the air.

We need go no further to show what Maler Müller's play is like. Clever it certainly is, -effective in many places; but no poem worthy of a second perusal, much less of a twentieth. It is the production of a clever man, not of a genius; just what hundreds of men could have written, all confident that it was more poetical than Goethe's.

To adapt the legend to his age, therefore, Goethe was forced to treat it symbolically, and his own genius gave the peculiar direction to that treatment. We shall see in the Second Part, how his waning vigor sought inspiration more in symbolism than in poetry, more in reflection than in emotion; but for the present, confining ourselves to the First Part, we note in his treatment a marvellous mingling of the legendary and the symbolical, of the medieval and the modern. The depth of wisdom, the exquisite poetry, the clear bright painting, the wit, humor and pathos, every reader will distinguish; and if this chapter were not already too long, I should be glad to linger over many details, but must now content myself with the briefest indication of the general aspects of the poem. And first of the main theme: The intended theme of Faust,' says Coleridge, is the consequences of a misology or hatred and depreciation of knowledge, caused by an originally intense thirst for knowledge baffled. But a love of knowledge for itself and for pure ends would never produce such a misology, but only a love of it for base and unworthy purposes.' Having stated this to be the theme, Coleridge thus criticises the execution: There is neither causation nor proportion in Faust; he is a ready-made conjuror from the beginning; the incredulus odi is felt

from the first line. The sensuality and thirst after knowledge are unconnected with each other.*' Here we have an example of that criticism before alluded to, which imposes the conceptions of the critic as the true end and aim of the artist. Coleridge had formed the plan of a Faust of his own, and blames Goethe for not treating the topic in the way Coleridge conceived it should be treated. A closer scrutiny would have convinced him that misology is not the intended theme. After the two first scenes knowledge is never mentioned; misology is exhausted as a topic in the initial stages of the work. And what says Goethe himself? The marionnette fable of Faust murmured with many voices in my soul. I too had wandered into every department of knowledge, and had returned early enough satisfied with the vanity of science. And life, too, I had tried under various aspects, and always came back sorrowing and unsatisfied.' Here, if anywhere, we have the key to Faust. It is a reflex of the struggles of his soul. Experience had taught him the vanity of philosophy; experience had early taught him to detect the corruption underlying civilization, the dark undercurrents of crime concealed beneath smooth outward conformity. If then we distinguish for a moment one of the two aspects of the peom - if we set aside the picture, to consider only the problem we come to the conclusion that the theme of Faust is the apotheosis of scepticism, the cry of despair over the nothingness of life. Misology forms a portion, but only a portion of the theme. Baffled in his attempts to penetrate the mystery of Life, Faust yields himself to the Tempter, who promises that he shall penetrate the enjoyment of Life. He runs the round of pleasure, as he had run the round of science, and fails.

* Table Talk, vol. ii. p. 114.

The orgies of Auerbach's cellar, the fancies of the Blocksberg, are unable to satisfy his cravings. The passion he feels for Gretchen is vehement, but feverish, transitory; she has no power to make him say to the passing moment, 'Stay, thou art fair.' He is restless because he seeks, seeks the Absolute, which can never be found. This is the doom of Humanity :

Es irrt der Mensch so lang' er strebt.

One word in conclusion. It has been said reproachfully that in Faust the problem is stated but not solved. I do not think this reproach valid, because I do not think a poem was the fit vehicle for a solution. Poems are not Systems; the Lyre is not a Pulpit. When the Singer becomes a Demonstrator, he abdicates his proper office, to bungle in the performance of another. But very noticeable it is that Goethe, who has so clearly stated the problem, has also, both practically, in his life, and theoretically, in his writings, given us the nearest approach to a solution by showing how the heavy and the weary weight of this great burden may be wisely borne. His doctrine of Renunciation dass wir entsagen müssen applied by him with fertile results in so many directions, both in Life and Theory, will be found to approach a solution, or at any rate to leave the insoluble mystery without its perplexing and tormenting influence. Activity and sincerity carry us far, if we begin by Renunciation, if we at the outset content ourselves with the Knowable and Attainable, and give up the wild impatience of desire for the Unknowable and Unattainable. The mystery of existence is an awful problem, but it is a mystery, and placed beyond the boundaries of human faculty. Recognize it as such, and renounce! Knowledge can only be relative, never absolute. But this relative knowledge is infinite,

and to us infinitely important: in that wide sphere let each work according to ability. Happiness, ideal and absolute, is equally unattainable: renounce it! The sphere of active Duty is wide, sufficing, ennobling to all who strenuously work in it. In the very sweat of labor there. is stimulus which gives energy to life; and a consciousness that our labor tends in some way to the lasting benefit of others makes the rolling years endurable.

CHAPTER VIII.

THE LYRICAL POEMS.

THE Faust and the Lyrics suffice to give Goethe preeminence among the poets of modern times, Shakespeare excepted; and had they stood alone as representatives of his genius, no one would ever have disputed his rank. But he has given the world many other works: in other words, he has thrown open many avenues through which the citadel of his fame may be reached. His fame is lessened by his wealth; the fact of his doing so much, has lessened the belief in his power; for as the strength of a beam is measured by its weakest part, so, but unjustly, are poets tested by their weakest works, whenever enthusiasm does not drown criticism. Thus does mere wealth endanger reputation; for when many targets are ranged side by side, the clumsiest archer will succeed in striking one; and that writer has the best chance with the critics who presents the smallest surface. Greek Literature is so grand to us mainly because it is the fragment of fragments; the masterpieces have survived, and no failures are left to bear counter-witness. Our own contemporary Literature seems so poor to us, not because there are no good books, but because there are so many bad, that even the good are hidden behind the mass of mediocrity which obtrudes itself upon the eye. Goethe has written forty volumes on widely different subjects. He has written