من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-3 من 72
الصفحة 84
In either case the owner of the decontrolled house suing after that date for possession must perforce assert decontrol under sec . 2 of the 1923 Act , and to meet an objection that it has ceased to apply , by force of sec .
In either case the owner of the decontrolled house suing after that date for possession must perforce assert decontrol under sec . 2 of the 1923 Act , and to meet an objection that it has ceased to apply , by force of sec .
الصفحة 238
pull it down is pulled down and rebuilt by the building owner , ” then certain results shall follow , one of which is that he shall make a good and fair allowance in respect of the disturbance and inconvenience caused to the adjoining ...
pull it down is pulled down and rebuilt by the building owner , ” then certain results shall follow , one of which is that he shall make a good and fair allowance in respect of the disturbance and inconvenience caused to the adjoining ...
الصفحة 321
In such cases , I have no doubt that as a rule the dealer , called the owner in the contract , impliedly warrants that the goods supplied to the customer , called the hirer in the contract , are as fit for the purpose for which they are ...
In such cases , I have no doubt that as a rule the dealer , called the owner in the contract , impliedly warrants that the goods supplied to the customer , called the hirer in the contract , are as fit for the purpose for which they are ...
ما يقوله الناس - كتابة مراجعة
لم نعثر على أي مراجعات في الأماكن المعتادة.
المحتوى
Alltree Canadian Fur Co Ltd v Dorman Long Co Ltd Allen | 8 |
Pearson 265 | 35 |
Tolhurst and Others | 78 |
حقوق النشر | |
8 من الأقسام الأخرى غير ظاهرة
طبعات أخرى - عرض جميع المقتطفات
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
accident action agent agreed agreement alleged allowance amount appears applicant arising authority award behalf breach building called carried caused certificate circumstances claim clause compensation condition consider contract costs Counsel COUNTY COURT course damages death deceased decision defendant disease easement effect employed employers employment entitled evidence express fact follows further give given ground hand HELD hire HONOUR injury instructed JUDGE judgment July land liability light Lord machine March matter meaning motor namely negligence notice nuisance obtained opinion owner paid particulars party payment person pigeons plaintiff premises present purchase question reasonable received recover referred regard relied rent respect respondents result road rule satisfied September servant signed suffering taken tenant third wall warranty week whole workman