صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني

No, I am that I am, and they that level
At My abuses reckon up their own:

I may be straight, though they themselves be bevel;
By their rank thoughts my deeds must not he shown;
Unless this general evil they maintain,

All men are bad, and in their badness reign.

He thinks it preferable to be really guilty of the plagiarisms with which he has been charged, than, being not guilty, to suffer the reproach, as in the latter case, knowing his own merit, he is deprived of the public appreciation, and suffers unjustly. Why should other writers, who are more guilty than he of using the writings of others to dress up their wit, be his accusers? Why should those who have made licentiousness the subject of their dramas charge him with it, and denounce as wicked what he thinks good? IIe obeys his own taste in his works, and asks no favors of those around him. They only publish their own guilt in the effort to blacken him. For aught they know, he may be right and they wrong. Neither the truth nor falsity of his writings must he tried by what they may ignorantly say of them, unless they assume ignorance and pretension to be proper standards of judgment for all men to adopt.

SONNET 122.

Thy gift, Thy tables, are within My brain
Full character'd with lasting memory,

Which shall above that idle rank remain

Beyond all date, even to eternity;

Or at the least, so long as brain and heart
Have faculty by nature to subsist;
Till each to raz'd oblivion yield his part
Of Thee, Thy record never can be miss'd.
That poor retention could not so much hold,
Nor need I tallies Thy dear love to score;
Therefore to give them from me was I bold,
To trust those tables that receive Thee more:
To keep an adjunct to remember Thee
Were to import forgetfulness in me.

His power as a writer and all the resources he has employed are born of himself. They can never be lost to him, and are equally inaccessible to his ignorant accusers. They will endure forever, or at least as long as brain and heart subsist. Until these are destroyed they will remain. His manuscripts could not contain them, and as he needed nothing to remind him of them, he had destroyed all records, trusting to the table of his memory which had received them in their full development. It would be a reproach to his memory to keep any mementos of the work which he held in such loving veneration.

It may be fairly inferred from the two preceding stanzas, that the plays which appeared in Shakespeare's name had aroused the envy of contemporaneous writers. They sought to depreciate them in the public estimation by charging the author with plagiarism. He replies by accusing them with an aggravated use of the same means, and the additional charge of igno

rance, which disqualifies them from judging him correctly. But lest their charges should at some time be substantiated by his papers and memoranda, he destroys them all, trusting to his memory, and claims his works as the product of his own brain.

SONNET 123.

No, Time, Thou shalt not boast that I do change:
Thy pyramids built up with newer might,
To Me are nothing novel, nothing strange;
They are but dressings of a former sight.
Our dates are brief, and therefore we admire
What Thou dost foist upon us that is old,
And rather make them born to our desire,

Than think that we before have heard them told.
Thy registers and Thee I both defy,

Not wondering at the present nor the past,
For Thy records and what we see doth lie,
Made more or less by Thy continual haste.
This I do vow and this shall ever be:

I will be true, despite Thy scythe and Thee.

In this stanza he apologizes for, or rather excuses, any use he may have made of the works of former writers in the construction of his own.

Time can know no change in him, as there is nothing new in the past. No description of the pyramids, however animated or glowing, could make them appear novel or strange to him. It would be but a new description of what he had known before. Our lives are short, and rather than spend them in search of new wonders, we admire the old ones, and each observer, led by

his own tastes, finds new beauties in them that he has never heard mentioned by others. He would not trust to the records that all ages have furnished of things in the past or present, for his own opinon of them; because they depend upon the accounts which, being formed from both careful and careless examination, are necessarily untrue. But in his writings, also founded upon events and stories of past ages, he will write truly, despite all the changes of time. Such truth as they afford in the illustration of truth, philosophy, poetry, character, and life, he will use, without regard to the skeleton which the past has furnished to be decorated by them. In this respect his dramas differ from those of his contemporaries, who are satisfied to use the stories and events of the past, as of themselves sufficient for their work.

SONNET 124.

If My dear love were but the child of state,
It might for Fortune's bastard be unfather'd,
As subject to Time's love or to Time's hate,
Weeds among weeds, or flowers with flowers gather'd.
No, it was builded far from accident;

It suffers not in smiling pomp, nor falls

Under the blow of thralled discontent,

Whereto the inviting time our fashion calls:

It fears not policy, that heretic,

Which works on leases of short-number'd hours,

But all alone stands hugely politic,

That it nor grows with heat nor drowns with showers.

To this I witness call the fools of time,

Which die for goodness, who have liv'd for crime.

In this stanza he contrasts the permanency of his writings with the character he has drawn of Posthumus in the play of "Cymbeline," which he was probably composing at the time. Posthumus was the adopted child of Cymbeline, and was subject to such fortune as Time held in store for him, whether good or bad,-a weed among weeds, or a flower among flowers. So his play, if it were similarly exposed, would suffer from similar causes. But this was not its fortune. Unlike Posthumus, it was unaffected by accident, owed nothing to the pomp and glitter of the court, and free of obligation, suffered nothing from the unkindness of majesty as Posthumus did. It suffered from no policy that, as in the case of Posthumus, limited his stay at court at the risk of his life. But it was a creation of itself, defiant of all the elements of court life and power. Those courtiers who spent their lives in dancing attendance upon majesty, and were finally rewarded with frowns, disappointments, and often death itself, would do well to profit by such an example. (See note "Francis Bacon," for further interpretation.)

SONNET 125.

Were 't aught to me I bore the canopy,
With my extern the outward honouring,
Or laid great bases for eternity,

Which prove more short than waste or ruining?

Have I not seen dwellers on form and favour

Lose all, and more, by paying too much rent,

« السابقةمتابعة »