American and British Claims Arbitration |
ما يقوله الناس - كتابة مراجعة
لم نعثر على أي مراجعات في الأماكن المعتادة.
طبعات أخرى - عرض جميع المقتطفات
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
according action adopted America amount appear application Attorney August authority called Chief Justice City claims considered Constitution costs Counsel County damages decided decision Defendants Dieperink district draft duly effect entitled Executive Council EXHIBIT existing facts farm Witfontein February force further Gazette give given Gold Government granted Grondwet ground High Court Honour independence issue Johannesburg Judges judgment July June Kruger land late letter license Main Reef March matter measure ment Mining Mining Commissioner months morning necessary notice obtain opinion owner passed pegged persons Plaintiff portion position present President Pretoria proclamation prospecting public digging published question R. E. Brown received reference refused regard resolution respect Responsible Clerk Robert Second Volksraad situated South African Republic summons sworn Syndicate taken thereof tion United Volksraad Volksraad resolution W. J. Leyds Wessels
مقاطع مشهورة
الصفحة 32 - Certainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and, consequently, the theory of every such government must be, that an act of the legislature, repugnant to the constitution, is void.
الصفحة 33 - Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.
الصفحة 31 - There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of 65 powers, may do...
الصفحة 31 - The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges as, a fundamental law.
الصفحة 32 - Those then who controvert the principle that the Constitution is to be considered, in court, as a paramount law, are reduced to the necessity of maintaining that courts must close their eyes on the Constitution and see only the law.
الصفحة 32 - This doctrine would subvert the very foundation of all written constitutions. It would declare that an act which, according to the principles and theory of our government, is entirely void, is yet, in practice, completely obligatory. It would declare that if the legislature shall do what is expressly forbidden, such act, notwithstanding the express prohibition, is in reality effectual. It...
الصفحة 31 - A constitution is in fact, and must be, regarded by the judges as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the two, that which has the superior obligation and validity ought of course to be preferred; or in other words, the constitution ought to be preferred to the statute, the intention of the people to the intention of...
الصفحة 183 - Pennsylvania, and to all whose acts as such full faith and credit are and ought to be given, as well in Courts of Judicature as elsewhere...
الصفحة 181 - Dana, whose name is subscribed to the certificate of the proof or acknowledgment of the annexed instrument, and thereon written, was, at the time of taking such proof or acknowledgment, a notary public in and for the county of New York dwelling in the said county, commissioned and sworn, and duly authorized to take the same.
الصفحة 33 - As the constitution is the supreme law of the land, in a conflict between that and the laws, either of congress, or of the states, it becomes the duty of the judiciary to follow that only, which is of paramount obligation.
معلومات المراجع
| العنوان | American and British Claims Arbitration American and British Claims Arbitration |
| الناشر | U.S. Government Printing Office, 1913 |
| أصلي من | مكتبة نيويورك العامة |
| الكتب ذات التنسيق الرقمي | 28 شباط (فبراير) 2008 |
| تصدير الاقتباس | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |