...in the ordinary course of things, does not happen to those who have the management of machinery and use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care." But that case also differs from die present...

...Defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen, if those who have the management use proper care,...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the Defendants, that the accident arose from want of care," which rule, we submit, is applicable to the...

...things, does not happen if those who have the management use the proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." The limitations governing the application of the rule are thus stated by Wigmore. (Sec. 2509)....

...defendant or his servants, and the accident is such us in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care, " — was applied to a bale of goods slung from...

...defendant or his servants, and the accident is such из iu the ordinary course of things does not bap)>eii if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, iu the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care, " — was...

...defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,...the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." So in Ourtis v. The Rochester and Syracuse Railroad Company, 18 NY 543, the Court of Appeals...

...under the management of the defendant, the accident is such aa in the ordinary course does not happen if ^those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care. Seoll v. London Dock Company,...

...management of the defendant, and the accident is such as, in the ordinary course of things, does not happen, if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence that the accident arose from want of care. (Scott v. Lond. Dock Co., 3 Hurlst. & Colt., 596.) It is...

...management of the defendant, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,...the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care."8 If a passenger in the train of a common carrier is injured by the derailment of the train,...

...defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen, if those who have the management use proper care,...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendBOOK I.] PROVINCES OF COURT AND JURY. [§ 423. § 423. Contributory negligence, — burden on...