صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني
[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

.

[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]

H.
Haddox, Catlin v.
Hale v. Morse,
Hartford (City of,) v. County of Hartford,
Hartwick, State v.
Hayden v. Smith,
Healey v. City of New Haven,
Heath v. Bancroft,
Heath v. Bates,
Hemingway v. Coleman,
Hilton v. Osgood,
Hine, Citizens' National Bank v.
Hinman, Newberry v.
Hoffman, Elphick v.
Hughes v. Dailey,
Hull v. Bartlett,
Hull v. Gallup,
Husted, Mead v.

492 481 554 101

83 394 220 342 390 110 236 130 331 34 64 279 336

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

K.
Kane v. New York and New England R. R. Co.,
Keney, Goodwin v.
Kelly v. Wiard,
King, Filley v.
Kingsley v. Johnson,

[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]

L. La Croix v. County Commissioners,

591

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]

N. Neuner, State v.

232 Newberry v. Hinman,

130 New Britain (City of,) N. York, New Haven and Hartford R. R. Co. v.

40 New Haven (City of,) Healey v.

394 New Haven and Northampton Co., Allen v.

243 New York and New England R. R. Co., Kane v.

139 New York, New Haven and Hartford R. R. Co. v. City of New Britain,

40 Norwich (City of,) Burdick v.

225

[ocr errors]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

R.

Rohrmayer, Flannery v.
Rood v. Stevens,
Rosenman, Baldwin v.
Rowland v. Smith,
Russell v. Bristol,

Page.

27 45 105 404 251

.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

.

.

.

S.
Sanborn, Potter v.
Security Co. v. Brinley,
Seeley v. Town of Litchfield,
Sisson, Butler v.
Smith, Hayden v.
Smith, Pasco v.
Smith, Rowland v.
Smith v. Staples,
Smith, State v.
Smith v. Stevens,
Spencer v. Bidwell,
Sprague Manufacturing Co., De Wolf v.
Staples, Smith v.
State v. Hartwick,
State v. Neuner,
State v. Smith,
State v. Ward,
Stevens v. Battell,
Stevens, Rood v.
Stewart, Pratt v.
Stonington (Town of,) Williams v.

452

48 134 580

83 576 404

87 376 181

61 282

87 101 232 376 429 155

45 339 229

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

.

[ocr errors]

.

.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

ERRATA.

P. 110, first line of head note-for 1775 read 1875.

403, add to the last line—"except LOOMIS, J., who dissented. Vol. 29, p. 577, last line-for 688 read 588.

“ 589, last line but one-for two read three. 48,“ 398, ninth line-for H. S. Pardee read H. E. Pardee.

590, sixth line-for 1857 read 1851.

SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS

OF THE

STATE OF CONNECTICUT.

DISTRICT OF HARTFORD,

EMBRACING THE COUNTIES OF

HARTFORD, WINDHAM, LITCHFIELD, MIDDLESEX

AND TOLLAND.

HELD ON THE FIRST TUESDAY OF JANUARY, 1881.

[Continued from the last volume.]

Present

PARK, C. J., CARPENTER, PARDEE, LOOMIS AND

GRANGER, Js.

FRANCES C. BLODGETT AND OTHERS vs. THE AMERICAN

NATIONAL BANK AND OTHERS.

A copartnership of which B had for several years been the senior member

and his son and son-in-law the other members, was reorganized for the prosecution of the same business under partnership articles in which it was provided that the partnership should not be dissolved by the death of B, but that his executor should act in his stead in the performance of his stipulations; that each partner should be credited by the new firm with the amount of capital he had already put in, with interest at seven per cent. in B’s favor and at six per cent. in favor of the others; that the profits should be taken by the other partners, and that as fast as capital could be spared it should be used to reduce by payments the amount B had in the concern. B died soon after, leaving a will in which he disposed of his property, but in which he made no further provision with regard to the partnership. The remaining members of the firm, one of whom was his executor, continued the business as

before, and the firm finally failed. Held1. That B's estate was liable for debts of the partnership contracted after

his death. 2. That this liability was not limited to the amount that he had put into the partnership, but extended to his whole estate. VOL. XLIX.-2.

« السابقةمتابعة »