 | 1843 - عدد الصفحات: 832
...was not known, or assumed to he known, hefore. Is ratiocination, then, not a process oi'inference ? And is the syllogism, to which the word reasoning has so often heen represented to he exclusively appropriate, not really entitled to he called reasoning at all ?... | |
 | 1843 - عدد الصفحات: 744
...be anything more in the conclusion than was allowed in the premisses. But this is, in fact, to say, that nothing ever was or can be proved by syllogism,...which was not known, or assumed to be known before Yet the acknowledgment, so explicitly made, has not prevented one set of writers from continuing to... | |
 | John Stuart Mill - 1846 - عدد الصفحات: 624
...be anything more in the conclusion than was assumed in the premisses. 13ut this is, in fact, to say, that nothing ever was," or can be, proved by syllogism,...Is ratiocination, then, not a process of inference 7 And in the syllogism, to which the word reasoning has so often been represented to be exclusively... | |
 | 1848 - عدد الصفحات: 544
...particulars but those which the principle itself assumes as foreknown." " But this is in fact to say, that nothing ever was or can be proved by syllogism,...which was not known, or assumed to be known, before." All real accession to our knowledge, then, must be contained in the general proposition, the major... | |
 | John Stuart Mill - 1858 - عدد الصفحات: 666
...be anything more in the conclusion than was assumed in the premisses. But this is, in fact, to say, that nothing ever was, or can be, proved by syllogism,...not really entitled to be called reasoning at all 1 This seems an inevitable consequence of the doctrine, admitted by all writers on the subject, that... | |
 | John Leechman - 1864 - عدد الصفحات: 244
...the unknown," he asks, with apparent triumph, "Is ratiocination, then, not a process of inference ? Is the syllogism, to which the word reasoning has...not really entitled to be called reasoning at all ?" So far from seeing this to be " an inevitable consequence " of the views we hold of the syllogism,... | |
 | William Thomas Brande - 1866 - عدد الصفحات: 992
...still more completely betrays the misconception which underlies the whole system ; for it implies ' that nothing ever was or can be proved by syllogism...which was not known or assumed to be known before.' Such a view would further involve the admission that ratiocination is not a process of inference, and... | |
 | William Thomas Brande, George William Cox - 1866 - عدد الصفحات: 972
...still more completely betrays the misconception which underlies the whole system ; for it implies ' that nothing ever was or can be proved by syllogism...which was not known or assumed to be known before.' Such a view would further involve the admission that ratiocination is not a process of inference, and... | |
 | William Thomas Brande - 1866 - عدد الصفحات: 968
...view would further involve the admission that ratiocination is not a process of inference, and that syllogism to which the word reasoning has so often been represented to be exclusively appropriate is not really entitled to be called reasoning at all. But logicians who speak thus of the syllogism... | |
 | William Thomas Brande, George William Cox - 1875 - عدد الصفحات: 968
...view would further involve the admission that ratiocination is not a process of inference, and that syllogism to which the word reasoning has so often been represented to be exclusively appropriate is not really entitled to be called reasoning at all. But logicians who speak thus of the syllogism... | |
| |
Logicians have been remarkably unanimous in their mode of answering this question. It is universally allowed that a syllogism is vicious if there be anything more in the conclusion than was assumed in the premisses. But this is, in fact, to say, that... 
