Francis Bacon's Philosophy of Science: An Account and a ReappraisalBacon's scientific method is commonly thought to proceed mechanically to its infallible end. In this book however, Urbach presents Bacon's philosophy in an alternative light which acquits him of several errors. Urbach describes Bacon as an experimental scientist and examines the criticisms made against him, one of which was that he did not understand the roles of mathematics and science. Bacon was not a traditional metaphysician and was alarmed at the lack of progress in science since ancient times, especially the lack of practical results. He attempted to open up a middle path between practical experience and unsupported theorizing. The author intends to clarify rather than defend Bacon's work. |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-3 من 39
الصفحة 110
However , I think it unlikely that Bacon's criticisms of his countryman were directed against the Philosophia Nova . ... Secondly , Bacon's first criticism was published in 1605 , well before he could have had access to Gilbert's ...
However , I think it unlikely that Bacon's criticisms of his countryman were directed against the Philosophia Nova . ... Secondly , Bacon's first criticism was published in 1605 , well before he could have had access to Gilbert's ...
الصفحة 155
Ellis raised a similar criticism : " No one acquainted with the history of natural philosophy would think it possible to form a collection of all the facts which are to be the materials on which any science is to operate , antecedently ...
Ellis raised a similar criticism : " No one acquainted with the history of natural philosophy would think it possible to form a collection of all the facts which are to be the materials on which any science is to operate , antecedently ...
الصفحة 189
A third point against the infallibility interpretation is that Bacon did not criticize the established sciences for ... to shield those principles from any kind of criticism , either by ignoring or by reinterpreting adverse evidence .
A third point against the infallibility interpretation is that Bacon did not criticize the established sciences for ... to shield those principles from any kind of criticism , either by ignoring or by reinterpreting adverse evidence .
ما يقوله الناس - كتابة مراجعة
لم نعثر على أي مراجعات في الأماكن المعتادة.
المحتوى
The Standard Interpretation | 17 |
Bacons Principles of Induction | 25 |
1 | 59 |
حقوق النشر | |
14 من الأقسام الأخرى غير ظاهرة
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
anticipation appear argued argument astronomy atoms axioms Bacon believe bodies called causes certainly Chapter claim clearly cold collection colour complete concerning conclusion considered correct course criticism described detailed direct discovered discovery discussion doubt earth effect established evidence example experimental experiments explain expressed facts final follows force further Gilbert hand heat hypotheses idea idols induction infallible instances interpretation italics kind knowledge laws lead light Magnete material mathematics matter means merely method mind motion namely nature necessary never objects observations original particles particular perhaps phenomena philosophy physical Popper positive possible practice predictions present principles probable produce question reason referred regarded rejected remarks scientific seems sense similar simple specific speculation substances suggested tables theory things thought true understanding University vacuum various writings