There magpy teacheth them to chat, When winter comes our Eues lacke heate, And then hot sprites must needs be had, To put in heat to colde; To townes they goe, within a while, Looke home old Adam. Marke this wile The holy whore no fellow hath, That midst her praiers sends her eie, The purer man, the better grace, The clearest hue the cherefulst face. Sprite moues her first to wish him wel, Doth make her seeke so far from wood, I'le tel you plaine, the matter is fresh, A displing rod must needs be had; This displing rod, will make you nod, Get home, keepe house, ware tounes so pure: When home you come, ioine faith & loue, Let neighbours field be as it was, Cast off your garments braue; Loue God and gospel as you ought, And let that goe, that was il sought. Must Must churches doune to maintaine pride A few doe verie wel. Crack me this nut, thou gentle blood, Shall prince say no, and pearlesse men And do they liue, and liue they stil Martin's farewel, and let's be friends, Yet no man's sword could strike so sore This is succeeded by six ten-line stanzas of a strange epithetical compound of garbled sentences, with a studied phraseology, in part imitating the Scotish language. A few lines will suffice. “Thou caytif kerne, vncouth thou art, vnkist thou eke sal bec, Thy spell is borrell, spokis bin blunt, thy sconce rude rusticall, Quhat zeale were thilke that kingis gwerdons, whae are iclad in clay, Should be so robd and ransackit, contrair to their behests, To make new vpstart lacks Lor-Danes, with coin to cram their chests? That they whaes fathers were bot kernis, knauis, pesants, clownis, & booris, Moght perke as paddocks, ligg in soft, & swath their paramoris.—St. 3. Thilke Thilke men of elde that han from God the sprite of prophecie, The shaftis of foolis are soone shotte out, bot fro the merke they stray, The epigrams have more abuse than. wit. St. 5 "New-fangled bores I thought to terme the birdes of Martin's nest, The merit or demerit of controversial publications is seldom a matter worth inquiry; their ephemerical purpose served, they are generally destroyed and forgotten. In the present instance, tracts that once created an universal ferment in this kingdom, now only occur among the rarest preservations of chance, and the most industrious research will not gratify the collector with obtaining possession of the whole pro and con. Literary curiosities they must remain while the history of the press forms a prominent feature in that of our country; but of their origin the following lines give such an indifferent description, as to leave that scarcity unregretted by general readers. "If any mervaile at the man, and doe desire to see, The stile and phrase of Martin's booke, come learn it here of me. Holde my cloke boy, chill haue a vling at Martin, O the boore, Th Th' vntauorie snuffes first iesting booke, though clownish, knauish was, Beare with his ingramnesse awhile, his seasoned wainscot fate, But, O, that godly cobler Cliffe, as honest an olde lad, These tinker termes, and barber's iestes first Tarleton on the stage, J. H. ART. VII. Supplement to some articles in the letters on Simon's coins. SIR, TO THE EDITOR OF CENSURA' LITERARIA. I now find that the second tom. of Kircher's dipus was published at Rome in 1653, but as the transmission of books from foreign countries was not then so quick as it has been since, it is still very possible that Walton might know nothing of the contents of that book when he published his own in 1657. I find See Herbert, p. 1687. however however that the coins of Simon had been made known to the public before the appearance of Kircher's book by a Jew of the name of Moses Alaschar; for that book of Alaschar is quoted by Morinus in his tract de Samarit. pentat, p. 209, which was published as early as 1631 it does not however appear whether Alaschar had or not discovered the name of Simon on them, but he had deciphered the legend of liberation of Zion, yet this alone was not sufficient to prove to Walton that they were coined since the captivity. : All legends, which had been found on Jewish coins before Alaschar, were only shekel of Israel or Jerusalem the holy, and they were of the larger kinds called shekels, which are now generally conceived to be all of them forgeries by the Jews to impose on Europeans, who were studious of Jewish antiquities: so that the too confident assertions of Scaliger, Walton, and Prideaux, were founded merely on error, or at best on coins not so sufficiently authenticated as those of Simon have been since. Hence we see how very slowly truth comes to light; but for the examiner of Mr. Hurwitz to remain under such an old error, and make use of an exploded argument after better evidence and more certain and later facts have been laid before the public, is less excusable. As to Prideaux it seems scarcely possible, but that he must have known the name of Simon to have been found on the only Jewish coins now esteemed genuine ; since I have pointed out so many authors by whom that name is mentioned before 1715 as found on such coins: his omission then of all notice of them seems to have arisen from his conviction, that coins struck under |