.../Enefidemus was this: it is the recollection of opinions embraced upon the teftimony of the fenfes, or upon any other evidence, by means of which one dogma is compared with another, and all, upon the comparifon, are found to be ufelefs and full of confufion. Seneca, comparing the Megaric and Sceptic...

...was more probable than another. The definition of Scepticism given by JLnesidemus was this r it is the recollection of opinions embraced upon the testimony...comparison, are found to be useless and full of \ confusion. Seneca, comparing the Megaric and Sceptic philosophers, says :M " The former furnish me with unprofitable...

...naturally lead a calm observer into doubt and difficulty. Skepticism, according to this school, was defined to be the recollection of opinions embraced upon the...comparison, are found to be useless and full of confusion. The end proposed by this philosophy was, by an universal suspension of judgment, to establish mental...

...naturally lead a calm observer into doubt and difficulty. Skepticism, according to this school, was defined to be the recollection of opinions embraced upon the...or upon any other evidence, by means of which one dqgma is compared with another; and all, upon the comparison, are found to be useless and full of confusion....

...proposition was more probable than another. The definition of Scepticism given by ALnesidemus was this: it is the recollection of opinions embraced upon the testimony...comparison, are found to be useless and full of confusion. Seneca, comparing the Megaric and Sceptic philosophers, says: "The former furnish me with unprofitable...