صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني

the Keturaïte tribes being called by the names already given by the former inhabitants to the districts they occupied. The most important tribe of the Keturaïtes was the great people of MIDIAN. Again, the twelve sons of Ishmaël are the heads of twelve tribes of Arabs. (Gen. x. 12—16.) There would seem to have been other descendants of Hagar in Arabia, for elsewhere the Hagarenes are distinguished from the Ishmaelites (Psalm lxxxiii. 6; comp. 1 Chron. v. 10, 19, 22); and we have other indications of a distinct tribe bearing the name of Hagarenes, both in the NW. and NE. of the peninsula. Another branch of the Abrahamide Arabs was furnished by the descendants of Esau, whose earliest abode was M. Seir in Arabia Petraea, and who soon coalesced with the Ishmaelites, as is intimated by the marriage of Esau with Ishmael's daughter, the sister of Nebajoth (Gen. xxix. 9), and confirmed by the close connection between the Nabathaeans and Idumeans throughout all their history. [EDOM; IDUMAEA; NABATHAEI.]

These statements present considerable difficulties, the full discussion of which belongs to biblical science. They seem, on the whole, to indicate three stages in the population of Arabia; first, on the west coast, by the descendants of Cush, that is, tribes akin to those whose chief seats were found in Aethiopia; secondly, by the descendants of Eber, that is, belonging to one of the most ancient branches of the great Semitic race, who migrated from the primitive seats of that race ad spread over the Arabian peninsula in general; and, lastly, a later immigration of younger tribes of the same race, all belonging to the Abrahamic family, who came from Palestine, and settled in the NW. part of the peninsula. The position of these last is determined by that of the known historical tribes which bear the same names, as Nebajoth, Ishmael's eldest son [NABATHAEI], and also by the prediction (or rather appointment, that Ishmaël should "dwell to the East of all his brethren." (Gen. xvi. 12, where in face of means to the east of.)

To these main elements of the Arab population must be added several of the minor peoples on the S. and E. of Palestine, who belong to Arabia both by kindred and position: such as the descendants of Uz and Buz, the sons of Abraham's brother Nahor, who appear as Arabs in the history of Job, the dweller in Uz, and his friend Elihu the Buzite (Gen. xxii. 21; Job. i. 1, xxxii. 2); the Moabites and Ammonites, descendants of Lot [AMMONITAE MOAB]; and some others, whose localities and affinities are more difficult to make out

The traditions of the Arabians themselves respecting their origin, though obscured by poetic fiction, and probably corrupted from motives of pride, family, national, and (since Mohammed) religious, have yielded valuable results already; but they need further investigation. They furnish a strong general confirmation to the Scripture ethnography. According to these traditions the inhabitants of Arabia from the earliest times are first divided into two races which belong to distinct periods; the ancient and the modern Arabs. The ancient Arabs included, among others, the powerful tribes of Ad, Thamud, Tasm, Jadis, Jorham (not to be confounded with the later tribe of the same name), and Amalek. They are long since extinct, but are remembered in favourite popular traditions, which tell of their power, luxury, and arrogance of these one of the most striking is the story of Irem Zat-el-Emad, the terrestrial paradise

of Sheddad the son of Ad, in which he was struck to death with all his race, and which is still believed to exist in the deserts of Yemen, in the district of Seba (Lane's Arabian Nights, note to chap. xi. vol. ii. p. 342). That this race, now become mythical, corresponds to the first Cushite inhabitants, seems most probable.

The modern Arabs, that is, all the inhabitants subsequent to the former race, are divided into two classes, the pure Arabs (Arab el-Araba, i. e. Arabs of the Arabs, an idiom like a Hebrew of the Hebrews) and the mixt or naturalized Arabs (Mostarabi, i. e. Arabes facti). The former are the descendants of Kahtan (the Joktan of Scripture); whose two sons, Yarab and Jorham, founded the kingdoms of Yemen in the S. of the peninsula and Hejaz in the NW. The subsequent intrusion of the Ishmaelites is represented by the marriage of Ishmael, a daughter of Modad, king of Hejaz, which district became the seat of the descendants of this marriage, the Mostarabi, so called because their father was a foreigner, and their mother only a pure Arab: their ancestral head is Adnan, son of Ishmael. Thus we have that broad distinction established between the Arabs of the N. and S. divisions of the peninsula, which prevails through all their history, and is better known by the later names of the two races, the Koreish in the N. and the Himyari in the S.

The latest researches, however, go far to disprove the connection of the Korcish with Ishmael, and to show that it was the invention of the age of Mohammed or his successors, for the purpose of making out the prophet, who was of the Koreish, to be a descendant of Abraham. These researches give the following ethnical genealogy. Yarab, already mentioned as the son of Kahtan, and the eponymus of the whole Arab race, became, through three generations, the ancestor of Saba, the name under which the southern Arabs were most generally known to the ancients. Of Saba's numerous progeny, two have become the traditional heads of the whole Arab race, namely, Himyar of those in the South (Yemen), and Kahlan of those in the North (Hejaz). According to this view the Ishmaelites are put back into their ancient seats, on the isthmus of the peninsula. The Himyarites, who inhabited El-Yemen and El-Hadramaut (both included in Yemenin its wider sense), were known to the Greeks and Romans by the name of HOMERITAE.

Within the last forty years, some very interesting. inscriptions have been found in S. Arabia, in what is believed with great probability to be the ancient Himyaritic dialect; and it has been discovered that the same language is still spoken by some obscure mountain tribes in the SE. parts of the peninsula, who call themselves Ehhkili, i. e. freemen. This language is said to be distinct from each of the three branches of the Syro-Arabian language recognized by Gesenius, namely, the Aramaean, Canaanitish, and Arabian; but it belongs to the same family, and comes nearer to Hebrew and Syriac than to Arabic; and it has close affinities with both the Ethiopic dialects, the Ghyz and the Amharic, especially with the former. It is needless to point out how strikingly these discoveries confirm the views, that the successive waves of population have passed over the peninsula from N. to S.; that the di placed tribes have been driven chiefly westward over the Red Sea, leaving behind them, however, remnants enough to guide the researches of the ethnographer; and that the present population is a mixed race, formed by suc

by caravans across the desert; we also find Egypt, Syria, and the countries on the Euphrates, not only infested by the predatory incursions of the Arabians, but in some cases actually subjected by them. Reference has been made to the opinion of one of the best of modern Orientalists, that Nimrod, the founder of the Babylonian monarchy, was an Arabian; and, on the other side of the peninsula, it is most probable that the Hyksos, or "Shepherd Kings," who for some time ruled over Lower Egypt, were Arabians. Their peaceful commerce was chiefly conducted by the NABATHAEI, in the NW., the HOMERITAE in the S., and the OMANITAE and GERRAEI in the E. of the peninsula. The people last mentioned had a port on the Persian Gulf, named Gerrha (near ElKatif), said to have been founded by the Chaldaeans, and found in a flourishing state in the time of Alexander; whence Arabian and Indian merchandize was carried up the Euphrates to Thapsacus, and thence by caravans to all parts of Western Asia. But there is ample evidence that the Phoenicians also carried on a considerable commerce by way of the Arabian gulf.

Through these channels there were opportunities. for the Greeks to hear of the Arabians at a very early period. Accordingly, in that epitome of Grecian knowledge of the extreme parts of the earth, the wanderings of Menelaus in the Odyssey, we find the Arabs of the E. of the Nile, under the name of Erembi (the m being a mere intonation: Od. iv. 83, 84):

cessive immigrations of the same great Syro-Ara- | trade carried on by ships over the Indian Ocean, and bian stock which have followed one another on the face of the land, like successive strata of a homogeneous material beneath its surface. For, just as the Arab genealogies, as explained above, trace the whole nation up to their common Shemide ancestor Kahtan, so does their actual condition testify amidst minor diversities of form, complexion, and language, to a community of race and character. So striking is this unity, that what there actually is of diversity within it is clearly to be traced, not so much to descent, as to mode of life. Thus the most marked division among the Arabs is into those of the towns and those of the desert. The description of the peculiar character of each belongs rather to universal than to ancient geography, though indeed in Arabia the two departments are scarcely to be distinguished: at all events it is superfluous to attempt to condense into a paragraph of this article those vivid impressions of Arab life and character, with which we are all familiar from childhood through the magic pages of the "Thousand and One Nights"; and to the perfection of which scarcely anything remains wanting since the publication of Mr. Lane's Notes to that collection. Both physically and intellectually, the Arab is one of the most perfect types of the human race. A most vivid description of his physical characteristics is given by Chateaubriand, in his Itinerary to Jerusalem, quoted, with other descriptions, in Prichard's Researches into the Physical History of Mankind, vol. iv. pp. 588, foll. (On the Arab Ethnography in general, besides Prichard, the following works are important: Perron, Lettre sur Histoire des Arabes avant l'Islamisme, in the Nouv. Journ. Asiat. 3me séries; Fresnel, Quatrième Lettre sur l'Histoire des Arabes avant l'Islamisme, in the Nouv. Journ. Asiat. 6 Août, 1838; Forster, His-Egypt. (Libya is only the coast adjacent to Egypt: torical Geography of Arabia, a most valuable work, but written perhaps with too determined a resolution to make out facts to correspond to every detail of the Scriptural ethnography; it contains an Alphabet and Glossary of the Himyaritie Inscriptions: for further information on the Inscriptions, see Wellsted, Narrative of a Journey to the Ruins of Nakab-al-Hajar, in the Journal of the Geogr. Soc. vol. vii. p. 20, also his copy of the great inscription in the Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, vol. iii. 1834, and his Journal, 2 vols. 8vo.; Cruttenden, Narrative of a Journey from Mokhá to San'á; Marcel, Mém. sur les Inscriptions Koufiques recueillies en Egypt, in the Description de l'Egypte, Etát Moderne, vol. i. p. 525; on the geography of Arabia in general, besides the above works, and the well-known travels of Burckhardt and Carsten Niebuhr, excellent epitomes are given in the article Arabia, in the Penny Cyclopaedia, by Dr. Rosen, and the article by Rommel in the Halle Encyklopädie.)

V. Arabia, as known to the Greeks and Romans. -The position of the Arabian peninsula-between two great gulfs whose shores touch those countries which were the seats of the earliest civilization of the world, and in the midst of the most direct path between Europe and western Asia, on the one hand, and India and eastern and southern Africa, on the other-would naturally invite its people to commercial activity; while their physical power and restless energy would equally tend to bring them into contact with their neighbours in another character. Accordingly, while we find, from the earliest times, Forts established on the coasts and an important

Κύπρον Φοινίκην τε καὶ Αἰγυπτίους ἐπαληθεὶς,
Αἰθιοπάς θ ̓ ἱκόμην καὶ Σιδονίους καὶ Ερεμβοὺς
Καὶ Λιβύην:

where the enumeration seems to show that the
Erembi included all to the E. and SE. of Syria and

comp. Eustath. ad loc.; Strab. i. p. 42, xvi. pp. 759, 784; Hellanic. ap. Etym. Mag. 8. v. 'Epeμsoi, and Tzetz. ad Lycoph. 827, Fr. 153, ed. Didot; Eustath. ad Dion. Perieg. 180; Ukert, vol. i. pt. 1, pp. 32, 69). In this view, the neighbourhood of the ̓Αραβίας ἄρειον ἄνθος

to the rock where Prometheus suffers, in Aeschylus (Prom. 420), is not so unaccountable as it seems, for both are at the E. extremity of the earth, on the borders of the Ocean.

But, for the earliest information of a really historical character, after what has already been gathered from Scripture, we must turn to Herodotus, who extended his travels to the part of Arabia contiguous to Egypt, and learnt much in Egypt, Syria, and Phoenicia, respecting the country in general. In ii. 12 he contrasts the soil of Egypt (the Nilevalley) with that of Libya, on the one hand, and Arabia on the other; that part of Arabia, namely, which extends along the sea (i. e. the Mediterranean) and is inhabited by Syrians, and which he therefore calls also Syria; which he says is argillaceous and rocky: the whole passage evidently refere to the district between the Delta and Palestine, which he elsewhere mentions as being subject, from Jenysus to Cadytis (Jerusalem), to the king of Arabia, i. e., some Beduin Sheikh (iii. 5). iii. 107, he gives a detailed description of Arabia, which is introduced as an illustration of his theory that the most valuable productions came from the extremities of the earth: Arabia is the last of the inhabited regions of the earth, towards the south, and it alone produces frankincense, and myrrh, and cassia, and cinnamon,

In

and ladanum (see above, § III.): and respecting | the methods of obtaining these treasures, he tells us some marvellous stories; concluding with the statement that, through the abundance of its spices, gums, and incense, the country sends forth a wonderfully sweet odour (iii. 107-113). As to the situation of Arabia, in relation to the surrounding countries, he says that, on the W. of Asia, two peninsulas (aktai) run out into the sea: the one on the N. is Asia Minor: the other, on the S., beginning at Persia, extends into the Red Sea ('Epv@pǹ Dáλaσoa, i. e. Indian Ocean),—comprising, first, Persia, then Assyria, and lastly Arabia; and ending at the Arabian gulf, into which Darius dug a canal from the Nile; not, however, ending, except in a customary sense (ou Anyovσa ei μǹ vóμw); a qualification which means that, though the peninsula is broken by the Arabian Gulf, it really continues on its western side and includes the continent of Libya. On the land side, he makes this peninsula extend from the Persians to Phoenicia, after which it touches the Mediterranean at the part adjacent to Palestine and Egypt: he adds that it includes only three peoples, that is, the three he named at first, Persians, Assyrians, and Arabians (iv. 38, 39). It must be observed that Assyria is here used in the wide sense, not uncommon in the early writers, to include the E. part of Syria. Of the people of Arabia, he takes occasion to speak, in connection with the expedition of Cambyses into Egypt through the part already mentioned (iii. 5) as subject to an Arabian king, namely, the later Idumaea; but his description is applicable to the Arabs of the desert (Beduins) in general. They keep faith above all other men, and they have a remarkable ceremony of making a covenant, in ratification of which they invoke Dionysus and Urania, whom they call Orotal and Alilat (i. e. the Sun and Moon); and these are the only deities they have (iii. 8, comp. i. 131). He mentions their mode of carrying water across the desert in camel's skins (iii. 9); and elsewhere he describes all the Arabs in the army of Xerxes as mounted on camels, which are, he says, as swift as horses, but to which the horse has such an antipathy that the Arabs were placed in the rear of the whole army (vii. 86, 87). These Arabs were independent allies of Persia: he expressly says that the Arabians were never subjected to the Persian empire (iii. 88), but they showed their friendship for the Great King by an annual present (oŵpov, expressly opposed to pópos) of 1000 talents of frankincense (iii. 97), the regularity of which may have depended on how far the king took care to humour them. With reference to the army of Xerxes, Herodotus distinguishes the Arabs who dwelt above Egypt from the rest: they were joined with the Aethiopians (vii. 69). As they were independent of the Persians, so had they been of the earlier empires. The alleged conquests of some of the Assyrian kings could only have affected small portions of the country on the N. and NW. (Diod. i. 53. § 3.) Xenophon gives us some of the information which he had gathered from his Persian friends respecting the Arabs. (Cyr. i. 1. § 4, 5. § 2, vi. 2. § 10.)

The independence of Arabia was supposed to be threatened by the schemes entertained by Alexander after his return from India. From anger, as some thought, because the Arabs had neglected to court him by an embassy, or, as others supposed, impelled only by insatiable ambition, he prepared a fleet on the Euphrates, whose destination was undoubtedly

[ocr errors]

Arabia, but whether with the rash design of subjugating the peninsula, or with the more modest intention of opening a highway of commercial enterprise between Alexandria and the East, modern criticism has taken leave to doubt. (Arrian. Anab. vii. 19, foll.; Thirlwall, Hist. of Greece, vol. vii. c.55.) He sent out expeditions to explore the coast; but they effected next to nothing; and the project, what ever it may have been, expired with its author.

The successors of Alexander in Syria experienced the difficulties which even their leader would have failed to surmount. Diodorus relates the unsuccessful campaigns made against the Nabathaean Arabs, by order of Antigonus, in which his lieutenant, Athenaeus, was signally defeated, and his son Demetrius was compelled to make a treaty with the enemy (xix. 94-100). Under the Seleucidae, the Arabs of Arabia Petraea cultivated friendly relations with Syria, and made constant aggressions on the S. frontier of Palestine, which were repelled by the more vigorous of the Maccabaean princes, till at last an Idumean dynasty was established on the throne of Jerusalem. [IDUMAEA: Dict. of Biog. art. Herodes.]

Meanwhile, the commercial enterprise of the Ptolemies, to which Alexander had given the great impulse by the foundation of Alexandria, caused a vast accession to the knowledge already possessed of Arabia, some important results of which are preserved in the work of Agatharcides on the Erythraean Sea (Phot. Cod. 250, pp.441-460, ed. Bekker). A great step in advance was gained by the expedition sent into Arabia Felix by Augustus in B.C. 24, under Aelius Gallus, who was assisted by Obodas, king of Petra, with a force of 1,000 Nabathaean Arabs. Starting from Egypt, across the Arabian Gulf, and landing at Leuce Come, the Romans penetrated as far as the SW. corner of the peninsula to Marsyabae, the capital of the Sabaeans; but were compelled to retreat, after dreadful sufferings from heat and thirst, scarcely escaping from the country with the loss of all the booty The allusions of the poets prove the eagerness with which Augustus engaged in this unfortunate expedition (Hor. Carm. i. 29. 1, 35. 38, ii. 12. 24, iii. 24. 1, Epist. i. 7. 35; Propert. ii. 8. 19); and, though it failed as a scheme of conquest, it accomplished more than he had set his heart on. Aelius Gallus had the good fortune to number among his friends the geographer Strabo, who accompanied him to Egypt, and became the historian both of the expediti n and of the important additions made by it to what was already known of the Arabian peninsula (Strab. xvi. pp. 767, foll.). A very full account of the people and products of the country is also given by his contemporary Diodorus (ii. 48-54, xix. 94-100). Of subsequent writers, those who have collected the most important notices respecting Arabia are, Mela (i. 2, 10, iii 8); Pliny (vi. 28. s. 32. et alib.); Arrian (Anab. ii. 20, iii. 1, 5, v. 25, vii. 1, 19, 20, 21, Ind. 32, 41, 43); Ptolemy (v.17, 19, vi. 7, et alib.); Agathemerus (ii. 11, et alib.); and the author of the Periplus Maris Erythraei, ascribed to Arrian. It is needless to enter into the details of these several descriptions, which all correspond, more or less accurately, to the accounts which modern writers give of the still unchanged and unconquered people. The following summary completes the history of Arabia, so far as it belongs to this work.

In A.D. 105, the part of Arabia extending E. of Damascus down to the Red Sea was taken posses

on of by A. Cornelius Palma, and formed into a Roman province under the naine of ARABIA. (Dion. Cass. lxviii. 14; Amm. Marc. xiv. 8.) Its principal towns were Petra and Bostra, the former in the S. and the latter in the N. of the province. [PETRA; BOSTRA.] The province was enlarged in A.D. 195 by Septimius Severus. (Dion. Cass. lxxv. 1, 2; Eutrop. viii. 18.) Eutropius speaks of this emperor forming a new province, and his account appears to be confirmed by the name of ARABIA MAJOR, which we find in a Latin inscription, to which A. W. Zumpt assigns the date of 211 (Inser. Lat. Sel. No. 5366). The province was subject to a Legatus, subsequently called Consularis, who had a legion under him. After Constantine Arabia was divided into two provinces; the part S. of Palestine with the capital Petra, forming the province of Palaestina Tertia, or Salutaris, under a Praeses; and the part E. of Palestine with the capital Bostra Leing under a Praeses, subsequently under a Dux. (Marquardt, Becker's Röm. Alterthum. vol. iii. pt. i. p. 201.)

Some partial temporary footing was gained, at a much later period, on the SW. coast by the Aethiopians, who displaced a tyrant of Jewish race; and both in this direction and from the N., Christianity was introduced into the country, where it spread to a great extent, and continued to exist side by side with the old religion (which was Sabacism, or the worship of heavenly bodies), and with some admixture of Judaism, until the total revolution produced by the rise of Mohammedanism in A.D. 622. While maintaining their independence, the Arabs of the desert have also preserved to this day their ancient form of government, which is strictly patriarchal, under heads of tribes and families (Emirs and Sheikhs). In the more settled districts, the patriarchal authority passed into the hands of kings; and the people were divided into the several castes of scholars, warriors, agriculturists, merchants, and mechanics. The Mohammedan revolution lies beyond our limits.

VI. Geographical Details.-1. Arabia Petraea. [PETRA; IDUMAEA; NABATHAEI].

2. Arabia Deserta (ʼn ěpnuos ’Apasía), the great Syrian Desert, N. of the peninsula of Arabia Proper, between the Euphrates on the E., Syria on the N., and Coelesyria and Palestine on the W., was entirely inhabited by nomad tribes (the Beduins, or more properly Bedawee), who were known to the ancients under the appellation of SCENITAE (EnviTal, Strab. xvi. p. 767; Plin. vi. 28. s. 32; Ptol.) from their dwelling in tents, and Nomadae (Noudda) from their occupation as wandering herdsmen, and afterwards by that of SARACENI (Zаракпνol), a name the origin of which is still disputed, while its renown has been spread over the world by its mistaken application to the great body of the Arabs, who burst forth to subdue the world to El Islam (Plin. c.; Ptol.; Ammian. xiv. 4, 8, xxii. 15, xxiii. 5, 6, xxiv. 2, xxxi. 16; Procop. Pers. ii. 19, 20). Some of them served the Romans as mercenary light cavalry in the Persian expedition of Julian. Ptolemy (v. 19) mentions, as separate tribes, the Cauchabeni, on the Euphrates; the Batanaei, on the confines of Syria [BATANAEA], the Agubeni and Rhaabeni, on the borders of Arabia Felix; the Orcheni, on the Persian Gulf; and, between the above, the Aeseitae, Masani, Agraei, and Marteni. He gives a long list of towns along the course of the Euphrates and the Persian Gulf, from

Thapsacus downwards; besides many in the inland parts; most of which are merely wells and halting places on the three great caravan-routes which cross the Desert, the one from Egypt and Petra, eastward to the Persian Gulf, the second from Palmyra southward into Arabia Felix, and the third from Palmyra SE. to the mouth of the Tigris.

3. Arabia Felix ('Apabía ǹ Evdaíμwv), included the peninsula proper, to which the name was extended from the SW. parts (see above). The op. posite case has happened to the modern name ElYemen, which was at first applied to the whole peninsula, but is now used in a restricted sense, for the SW. part, along the S. part of the Red Sea coast. Ptolemy makes a range of mountains, extending across the isthmus, the North boundary of Arabia Felix, on the side of Arabia Deserta; but no such mountains are now known to exist. The tribes and cities of this portion, mentioned by Ptolemy and Pliny, are far too numerous to repeat; the chief of them are treated of in separate articles, or under the following titles of the most important tribes; beginning S. of the NABATHAEI, on the W. coast: the THAMY DENI and MINYAE (in the south part of Hejaz) ir the neighbourhood of MACORABA (Mecca); the SABAEI and HOMERITAE in the SW. part of the peninsula (Yemen); on the SE. coast, the CHATRAMOTITAE and ADRAMITAE (in El-Hadramaut, a country very little known, even to the present day); on the E. and NE. coast the OMANITAE and DARACHENI and GERRAEI (in Oman, and El-Ahsa or El-Hejeh). [P.S.]

in

ARABIA FELIX (Apabía evdalμwv, Peripl. p. 14; 'Apasías európiov, Ptol. vi. 7. §9; 'ApaGía тò éμπóρiov, viii. 22. § 8), or ATTANAE (Plin. vi. 28. s. 32, Sillig, 'Adárn, Philostorg. H. E. iii. 4; Aden), the most flourishing sea-port of Arabia Felix, whence its name; the native name being that given by Pliny and Philostorgius. It was on the coast of the Homeritae, in the extreme S. of the peninsula, about 1° E. of the Straits of Bab-el-Mandeb, 45° 10' E. long., and 12° 46' N. lat. Ptolemy places it in 80° long. and 111° N. lat. It was one of his points of recorded astronomical observation; its longest day being 12 hrs. 40 min., its distance E. from Alexandreia 1 hr. 20 min. The author of the Periplus ascribed to Arrian states that it was destroyed by Caesar, which can only refer to the expedition of Aelius Gallus, under Augustus. The blow, however, was soon recovered, for the port continued to flourish till eclipsed by Mokha. Its recent occupation, in 1839, as our packet station between Suez and Bombay, is raising it to new consequence; its population, which, in 1839, was 1,000, was nearly 20,000 in 1842. The ancient emporium of Arabian spices and Indian wealth, restored to importance, after the lapse of centuries, as a station and coal depôt for the overland mail, exhibits a curious link between the ancient and modern civilization of the East, and a strange example of the cycles in which history moves. Aden is undoubtedly the Arabia of Mela (iii. 8. § 7), though he places it within the Arabian Gulf. Michaelis supposed it to be the Eden of Ezekiel (xxvii. 23), but his opinion is opposed by Winer (Bibl. Realwörterbuch, s. v. Eden). Some also suppose it to be the Ophir of Scripture. [OPHIR]. [P.S.]

ARABIAE and ARABICUS MONS (rns 'Apa6íns, Tò 'Apáciov obpos: Jebel Mokattem, fc.), the name given by Herodotus (ii. 8) to the range of mountains which form the eastern border of the

Nile-valley, and separated it from the part of Arabia |
W. of the Arabian Gulf. The range on the west
side towards Libya he names, in the same way,
Libyci Montes. [AEGYPTUS.]
[P.S.]
ARA'BICUS SINUS, or MARE RUBRUM (8
'Арábios кóλжоs, Herod., &c.; in some later writers
̓Αραβικός κόλπος; Ἐρυθρὰ θάλασσα, its usual
name in LXX. and N. T.: Arab. Bahr-el-Kolsum:
Red Sea), the long and narrow gulf which extends
northwards from the Indian Ocean, between Arabia
on the E. and Africa (Abyssinia, and Nubia, and
Egypt) on the W., between 12° 40′ and 30° N. lat.
and between 43° 30′ and 32° 30' E. long. Its di-
rection is NNW. and SSE.: its length 1400 miles;
its greatest breadth nearly 200 miles.

Herodotus knew the Red Sea as a narrow gulf of the great ocean, which he supposed to extend S. of Asia and Africa, but that his notion of the connection between the two was very vague; a view confirmed by the fact that he regards Arabia as the southernmost country of Asia (iii. 107). Respecting the gulf which forms the western head of the Red Sea, he had the opportunity of gaining accurate information in Lower Egypt, even if he did not see it himself; and, accordingly, he gives its width correctly as half a day's voyage in its widest part (the average width of the Gulf of Suez is thirty miles); but he fell into the error of supposing the whole sea to be the same average width. For its length he was dependent on the accounts of traders; and he makes it much too long, if we are to reckon the forty days by his estimate of 700 stadia, or even 500 stadia, a day, which would give 2,400 and 2,000 geog. miles respectively. But these are his estimates for sailing, and the former under the most favourable circumstances; whereas his forty days are expressly for rowing, keeping of course near the coast, and that in a narrow sea affected by strong over, the Gulf of Bab-el-Mandeb should, perhaps be included in his estimate. Herodotus regarded the Nile-valley and the Red Sea as originally two parallel and equal gulfs, the one of the Northern Ocean, and the other of the Southern; of which the former has been filled up by the deposit of the Nile in two myriads of years, a thing which might happen to the latter, if the Nile were by any chance to be turned into it (ii. 11). How little was generally known of the S. part of the Red Sea down to the time of Herodotus, is shown by the fact that Damastes, the logographer, a disciple of Hellanicus, believed it to be a lake. (Strab. i. p. 47.)

It was first known to the ancients in its N. part, that is, in the western bay of the two into which its head is parted by the peninsula of Mt. Sinai (Gulf of Suez). The Israelites, whose miraculous passage of this gulf, near its head, is the first great event in their history as a nation, called it the sedgy sea. It seems to have been to this part also (as the earliest known) that the Greek geographers gave the name of Red Sea, which was afterwards ex-tides, and full of impediments to navigation. Moretended to the whole Indian Ocean; while the Red Sea itself came to be less often called by that name, but received the distinctive appellation of Arabian Gulf. But it never entirely lost the former name, which it now bears exclusively. To find a reason for its being called Red has puzzled geographers, from Strabo (xvi. p. 779) to the present day. The best explanation is probably that, from its washing the shores of Arabia Petraea, it was called the Sea of Edom, which the Greeks translated literally into ἡ ἐρυθρὰ θάλασσα.

Another curious conjecture was that of Strabo, the writer on physics, and Eratosthenes, who tried to account for the marine remains in the soil of the countries round the Mediterranean, by supposing that the sea had a much higher level, before the disruption of the Pillars of Hercules; and that, until a passage was thus made for it into the Atlantic, its exit was across the Isthmus of Suez into the Red Sea ('Epv0pà dáλaσoa). This theory, the latter part of which was used to explain Homer's account of the voyage of Menelaus to the Aethiopians, is mentioned and opposed by Strabo (i. pp. 38, 39, 57; Eratosth. Frag. p. 33, foll. ed. Seidel.)

The views of the ancients respecting this gulf are various and interesting. Herodotus (ii. 11) calls it a gulf of Arabia, not far from Egypt (i. e. the Nilevalley), flowing in from the sea called 'Epu@ph, up to Syria, in length forty days' rowing from its head to the open sea, and half a day's voyage in its greatest breadth; with a flood and ebb tide every day. In c. 158, he speaks of Necho's canal as cut into the Red Sea, which he directly afterwards calls the Arabian Gulf and the Southern Sea; the mixture of the terms evidently arising from the fact that he is speaking of it simply as part of the great sea, which he calls Southern, to distinguish it from the Northern, i. e. the Mediterranean. So, in iv. 37, he says that the Persians extend as far as the Southern or Red Sea, ἐπὶ τὴν νοτίην θάλασσαν τὴν Ἐρυθρὴν και The ancient geographers first became well acAevμény, i. e. the Persian Gulf, which he never dis- quainted with the Red Sea under the Ptolemies. tinguishes from the Erythraean Sea, in its wider About B.C. 100, Agatharchides wrote a full desense; thus, he makes the Euphrates and Tigris scription of both coasts, under the title Пep Tis fall into that sea (i. 180, vi. 20). Again, in iv. 39, épvėpûs Dáλaoons, of the 1st and 5th books of which speaking of Arabia, as forming, with Persia and we have a full abstract by Photius (Cod. 250, Assyria, a great peninsula, jutting out from Asia pp. 441-460, ed. Bekker; and in Hudson's Geointo the Red Sea, he distinguishes the Arabian Gulf graphi Graeci Minores, vol. i.); and we have numeas its W. boundary; and he extends the Erythraean rous notices of the gulf in Strabo, Mela, Pliny, Ptosea all along the S. of Asia to India (c. 40). Again, lemy, and Agathemerus. They describe it as one in c. 159, he speaks of Necho's fleet "on the Arabian of the two great gulfs of the Southern Sea (voría Gulf, adjacent to the Red Sea" (el Tỷ 'Epulpy da- Jáλaooa, Strab. p. 121), or Indian Ocean, to which λάσσῃ); and, in relating the circumnavigation of the names of Ἐρυθρὰ θάλασσα and Mare Rubrum Africa under that king, he says that Necho, having were now usually applied, the Red Sea itself being finished the canal from the Nile to the Arabian sometimes called by the same name and sometimes Gulf, caused some Phoenicians to embark for the by the distinctive name of Arabian Gulf. Ptolemy expedition; and that they, setting forth from the carefully distinguishes the two (viii. 16. § 2); as Red Sea, navigated the Southern Sea (Spunoévres also does Agathemerus, whose Red Sea (Epv@pà ἐκ τῆς Ἐρυθρῆς θαλάσσης ἔπλωον τὴν νοτίην θά- θάλασσα) is the Gulf of Bab-el-Mandeb. It ex. Aaroav), and so round Libya by the Pillars of Her-tended from Arabia Petraea to the S. extremity of cules to Egypt (iv. 42). These passages show that the coast of the Troglodytae in Aethiopia, being

|

« السابقةمتابعة »