صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني

have been impossible for the apostate Church to fulfil those prophecies, by disregarding the latter and paying devout attention to the former. That many therefore of those scriptures, which form the most essential part of the canon of the apostate Church, must be fabulous and false, seems as certain, as that the word of God is true. Strongly impressed with this apparently inevitable consequence from those prophecies, and dissatisfied with all the external evidence which the case admits, he turned his attention more particularly to those internal marks of authenticity or spuriousness, which genuine or fietitious scriptures must always necessarily contain. And that attentive examination brought him to the conclusions which he here submits to public consideration. He does this the more cheerfully, because the subjects of discussion, like the Gospel of Christ itself, are level to common capacities, and intelligible to every person who will exert his rational faculties about them: for where the detection of forgery and falsehood depends upon gross and palpable inconsistencies and contradictions, it is not peculiarly the province of that critical skill which requires a knowledge of the original language of the scriptures attainable to few ; but, when those contradictions are pointed out, becomes the proper business of the common sense of every reader of even the vulgar translations. He is fully persuaded, that nothing can so effectually amend and bless mankind, as a general, rational comprehension and well-grounded belief of the Gospel Covenant; and that nothing can so much promote the cause of Christian truth and piety, as the distinguishing them from fabulous falsehood and impious superstition. Unconnected for near thirty years with any religious sect or party whate soever, disapproving in every point of view of the office of a teacher of so plain a thing as Christianity, considered as a lucrative occupation, and much too far advanced in life to have any temporal interest in view, the Author trusts his mind has been perfectly unbiassed and impartial in its investigations. But if he should have deceived himself, and be judged by others to be in the wrong, still his errors, if found to be such, may most easily be exposed and refuted; and no one will be better pleased than himself with their just and candid refutation. Should this, however, be attempted, he hopes it will be effected in a more manly, rational manner,

than was adopted by the only two gentlemen who thought proper to make any public attack upon the first edition, by clearly reconciling the several objectionable passages, as the scriptures really exist, without recurring either to any human authority, or to a fanciful transposition of paragraphs, or to hypothetical systems unwarranted by the Gospels themselves; for, by such means, a man of a fertile imagination may possibly frame an ideal history of Jesus, which may comprehend the most incongruous circumstances, as geometricians can contrive to draw a circle of some diameter or other through any three points which lie not in a right line; but, if such modes of interpreting scripture may be allowed, the most ingenious novel-writer will make the ablest commentator; and in removing the difficulties of the evangelical histories, will far surpass the efforts of the most learned doctors of Christendom.

* * * * - - - . . * * ; : " : " . . . . . . • * * * * * * - - - - -

!
-

TABLE OF CONTENTs.
------

INTRODUCTION. - - - *Section. * Page. I. General remarks upon the contents of the Evangelical His- tories, and the historical evidence of their authenticity. - 17 II. The only certain evidence of the truth of any Divine Re

velation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 III. Reasons why the testimony of those writers whom the Church call Orthodox, cannot afford us satisfaction. . . . . . . . . . . . 26

IV. Further reasons for not admitting the testimony of the Fathers of the Church, of the second and third centuries. , 30

V. Still greater defects in their testimony, derived from the received maxim of those schools of Philosophy in which they had all been educated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3

VI. Reasons for preferring the Histories of Luke, and making them the standard of comparison between the Evangelical Histories • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .” +38

[ocr errors]

CHAP. I.-Gospel according to Luke. * *

I. Remarks on the style and composition of this Gospel–Corrupted with sundry interpolations—The story of the herd

[ocr errors]

of swine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 II. Interpolations in the Lord's Prayer—Baptism of Jesus— Temptation—And Transfiguration ... . . . . . . . . . . • * . . . . *53

HII. One of greater importance in the two first chapters—Some others of less moment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *57

CHAP. II.-Gospel according to Luke continued. I, Agreement between the internal and external evidence in

favour of Luke's Histories—Supernitural testimony also

necessary to prove the truth of any historian of a divine

• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

- - - or 1 to to i ! :o) * The Sections in the pages marked thus (*),were omitted in the printing; but the fresh Paragraph in each, denotes where they ought to have been inserted.

II. Miracles recorded in this Gospel ..

[graphic]
[graphic]
« السابقةمتابعة »