must recruit their little army; further, how unseemly, not to say inconvenient, pernicious to all religion depending on something else than "evidences," it would be that on their solemn holidays the infant state assembled within its one small temple, should find their worship disturbed by unknown names and rites, by uncouth movements and shapeless foreign images; how necessary for that village congregation the unity of thought which we call a national religion: lastly, where at any time an inadvertent action of a single citizen, even though directly it only affected himself, might bring down danger or destruction on the whole number, how strict must be the laws regulating the indirect influence of man upon man, and where the citizens of a state were an army, an army at any time liable to active service, how necessary must be habits of ready unflinching obedience to the appointed ruler. And now when the six swelled into sixty thousand families, and the little village became a country with a capital, and the rough-hewn enclosure that sufficed for the worship of a score or two of worshippers had given place to a vast temple fit for a vast nation, can you wonder if the King still claimed as his due the absolute obedience once willingly and naturally rendered to the strong man, the wise counsellor, the valiant warrior, if the priest still hugged the memory of the old uniformity or rather identity of idolatry, if the elders looked with severe eyes on the gradual relaxation of regulations which their forefathers had found necessary for the welfare of their country, and which they themselves still regarded with a respect the more obstinate because now unreasonable? I should not wonder at their hesitation; for who was it that taught the King that he was no longer the one strong wise and valiant man, or the priest that he was no longer the sole trumpet of the breath of God, or the elders that their old order must change, and give place to new; who but the slow-speeched, stammering teacher, Experience? Remember also that it is from the small states, not from the large states of ancient times, that we have derived most of our experience of ancient government, and ask yourself whether our larger states may not unconsciously have adopted fetters that were then suitable, but are now unsuitable; whether we require now the same restraint of individual and accumulation of public power, the same laws either as regards military science, or participation in the national religion, or the indirect influence of citizen on citizen. Then remember on the other VOL. IV. N hand that throughout its whole history the English nation has answered this question in the negative, and has steadily for centuries persisted in relaxing restraint after restraint, and unlearning the teachings of antiquity, and ask yourself whether we have gone far enough already, at least for the present, or must yet go further in unlearning and if the governing classes of England seem to you unreasonably slow, let me remind you, once for all, that they too, like the first father and the first nation, are scholars in the school of experience, a teacher laden with the knowledge and books and parchments and monuments of six thousand years, but still to this day as slow of speech as ever. But here we are off the common and on the bank, and men begin to look at us as though our conversation were a little out of place. J. Well, let us leave off now, but mind, I by no means say I agree with your opinion, and indeed, I'm not certain I could exactly say what your opinion is: besides, you have done little more than just touch on one point of libertyliberty of thought.-And, what with likings and dislikings, and physicians and politicians, I feel as confused as poor Demea after he had consulted with his three wise lawyers, and am quite ready to cry with him, "fecisti probe: ego multo incertior sum quam dudum.” old S. At any rate I have had quite enough of it for the present if you have not; when we come back again, if you are not tired, we may perhaps have a word or two about Liberty of Action; for I agree with you that we have but touched on what is only a part of a vast subject; and, if you feel like old Demea, I can assure you I sympathize with his lawyer, and answer you, "ego censeo amplius deliberandum, res magna'st." And now for the boats. PSYCHE.* I. BRIGHT Aphrodité, golden Queen of Love, Which waved its ceaseless flow adown her neck Long time then thus she lay:—at length between Her rosy lips disparted half displayed A pearly row, more fair than those bright gems, The sapphire parapets of heavenly homes,- * Vid. Apuleius Metamorph. IV., V., VI. To catch the whispered vow or soft-breathed prayer! And odours as from heavenly mansions drawn— She blushing kissed his dimpled cheek well pleased:- And honey-sweet consuming flames* of love, O hear me ! That I may find delight in deep revenge. So abject that his equal be not found, Tho' all the earth be searched through and through!" Which bowed its eager crest beneath her tread. And blue-eyed Glaucé; and Cymothoé, And Galatea famed for rarest beauty, With their fair sisters,-all that lightly cleave Within her chamber up the palace tower "For how should woman walk alone through life, Mellitas uredines," Apuleius Metamorph. IV. |