Congress and Defense Spending: The Distributive Politics of Military ProcurementUniversity of Oklahoma Press, 2002 - 200 من الصفحات Since World War II, the U.S. government has spent more than $10 trillion on defense. Although everyone in the United States must pay taxes supporting defense contracts, ten states have obtained 75 percent of all defense contracts and expenditures. In Congress and Defense Spending , Barry S. Rundquist and Thomas M. Carsey examine how the distribution of defense contracts is influenced by the interaction of state and local economies with the organization of Congress and how previous state representation on defense committees has affected current committee representation. |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-5 من 47
الصفحة 3
عذرًا، محتوى هذه الصفحة مقيَّد.
عذرًا، محتوى هذه الصفحة مقيَّد.
الصفحة 4
عذرًا، محتوى هذه الصفحة مقيَّد.
عذرًا، محتوى هذه الصفحة مقيَّد.
الصفحة 5
عذرًا، محتوى هذه الصفحة مقيَّد.
عذرًا، محتوى هذه الصفحة مقيَّد.
الصفحة 7
عذرًا، محتوى هذه الصفحة مقيَّد.
عذرًا، محتوى هذه الصفحة مقيَّد.
الصفحة 14
عذرًا، محتوى هذه الصفحة مقيَّد.
عذرًا، محتوى هذه الصفحة مقيَّد.
المحتوى
Introduction and Statement of Problem | 3 |
A Model of Distributive Politics | 66 |
Targeting Military Procurement Expenditures | 87 |
Cumulative Effects and Overall | 110 |
Trends in the Distributive Politics | 118 |
The Impact of Military Procurement Spending | 141 |
Appendix | 167 |
Notes | 179 |
References | 187 |
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
analysis argue Armed Services benefit hypothesis capacity capita income capita military procurement Carsey chamber changes chapter coalition committee members Congress congressional conservative constituencies county-level curement expenditures defense committee representation defense contracting defense spending dependent variable direct effect distribution of defense distribution of military distributive politics distributive theory districts dummy variables economic growth effects of prior electoral equation estimates evidence figure findings geographic distribution Gunbelt House defense committee increase interaction intrapolicy universalism itary procurement legislative level of defense logrolling majority party members MC ideology ment military contracts military procurement awards military procurement benefits military procurement expenditures military procurement spending mittee representation national defense nomic partisanship percent period policy benefits Political Science politics of military pork barrel predicted Reagan's receive reelection relationship relatively Republican Rolling average effect Rundquist Senate defense committee Shepsle Standardized Coefficient statistical model structure suggests targeting tion tive unemployment versions of distributive Weingast