صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني

Nor, proud and restless, burn'd to know
The knowledge that brings guilt and woe!
Often so much I lov'd to trace
The secrets of this starry race-
Have I at morn and evening run
Along the lines of radiance spun,
Like webs, between them and the sun.
Untwisting all the tangled ties
Of light into their different dyes→→→
Then fleetly wing'd I off in quest
Of those, the farthest, loneliest,
That watch, like winking sentinels,
The void, beyond which Chaos dwells,
And there, with noiseless plume, pursued
Their track through that grand solitude,
Asking intently all and each

What soul within their radiance dwelt, And wishing their sweet light were speech, That they might tell me all they felt. He obtains little information from these heirs of space," as he eloquently calls the stars. He searches Earth, and wanders amongst women; of course, he falls in love; for he would not be one of Mr. Moore's Angels, if he escaped. The description of the she, takes up three full pages; and if woman's beauty ever was adorned till it became ridiculous, the poet's picture exhibits it with such adornment. No wonder that the angel became confused. He recounts his love in the true figured flounces of poesy.

It was in dreams that first I stole

With gentle mastery o'er her mindIn that rich twilight of the soul,

When Reason's beam, half hid behind
The clouds of sense, obscurely gilds
Each shadowy shape that Fancy builds→→→
The following is love of the right
Moorish manufacture.

One night 'twas in a holy spot,
Which she for pray'r had chos'n-a grot
Of purest marble, built below
Her garden beds, through which a glow
From lamps invisible then stole,

Brightly pervading all the place-
Like that mysterious light the soul,
Itself unseen, sheds through the face-
There, at her altar while she knelt,
And all that woman ever felt,

When God and man both claim'd her

sighsEvery warm thought, that ever dwelt, Like summer clouds, 'twixt earth and

skies,

Too pure to fall, too gross to rise, Spoke in her gestures, tones and eyes, Thus, by the tender light, which lay Dissolving round, as if its ray

Was breath'd from her, I heard her say:--The angel gives us reason to believe that the woman is a fallen angel

also. At her intreaty, he opens to her all that is strange in Earth or Heaven. She grows rich in mys terious knowledge. At length, on one evening, a fine evening, with about six and twenty lines of sunset, the spirit says, that the woman playfully laid her hand upon his head, related a dream, and begged to see him in all his glory. The angel, conceiving no danger, expands his wings, folds her to his breast, and literally burns her down! The following is the sacred poetry of the angel's description.

Great God! how could thy vengeance light
So bitterly on one so bright?
How could the hand, that gave such charms,
Blast them again, in love's own arms?
Scarce had I touch'd her shrinking frame,
When oh most horrible!-I felt
That every spark of that pure flame

Pure, while among the stars I dwelt→
Was now by my transgression turn'd
Burn'd all it touch'd, as fast as eye
Into gross, earthly fire, which burn'd,

Could follow the fierce, ravening flashes,
Till there-oh God, I still ask why
Such doom was hers ?—I saw her lie

Black'ning within my arms to ashes!

The woman, however, before she dies of this rapid consumption, kisses him, and leaves a mark on the spirit's forehead, like that said to have burned on the brow of the wandering Jew. He and the two other angels kneel down and breathe

Inwardly the voiceless prayer, Unheard by all but Mercy's ear, And which if Mercy did not hear, Oh, God would not be what this bright And glorious universe of his, This world of beauty, goodness, light, And endless love proclaims He is o The third story is a happy one,— at least happy in its incidents. It is, however, miserably feeble and confused in its execution. We have neither room nor inclination to go through it-we just learn that an angel is married, and "lives very happy ever after."

Our readers, we should suppose, have by this time had quite enough of the Loves of the Angels. The chief materials, out of which the descriptions and the sublimities are wrought, are, stars and wings! Stars twinkle in every page nearlyand for the perfumery, trembling, flapping and folding of wings, let the reader turn to page 7, or 11, or 15, or 22, or 61, or 77, or almost any inter

mediate page. At page 31, there is
an odd simile:

And when he smiled,-if o'er his face
Smile ever shone,-'twas like the grace
Of moonlight rainbows.

This likening of a thing, that most likely never existed, to something that no one can comprehend,-is whimsical enough. We met with a simile lately of the same kind in Mr. Beddoes's Brides' Tragedy:

Like flowers' voices,--if they could but speak.
These similes are two for a pair.

We had set down several passages for selection, as specimens of Mr. Moore's peculiar style of expression, when he wishes to be thought most earnest and intense. But three will serve as well as a hundred for our readers. The first angel in a rhapsody of passion exclaims, as a windup of feeling,

-Throughout creation I but knew

Two separate worlds-the one, that small
Belov'd and consecrated spot,
Where Lea was-the other, all

Again the same passionate grammatical angel says,—

No matter where my wanderings were,
So there she look'd, mov'd, breath'd, about,
Woe, ruin, death, more sweet with her,
Than all heaven's proudest joys without.

This is Shenstone's "Heu quanto minus, &c. done into English with a vengeance!

Angel the second says→
Nay, even with Lilis-had I not
Around her sleep in splendour come,-
Hung o'er each beauty, nor forgot
To print my radiant lips on some!

Some? Some what?

These are not passages laboriously culled; we could, if we had room, fill several columns with such stuff,but really, we must take to other subjects. The poem is, in truth, not only badly conceived, but wretchedly written. And we are quite sure that if poor Lord Thurlow's muse had penned anything half so gross and dull, Mr. Moore would have hung her up in the Edinburgh Review, as

The dull wide waste, where she was not. a warning to all poetical murderers.

THE MISCELLANY.

We shall not trouble our readers with a regular introduction to our third number of the Miscellany. We have brought it into life, nursed it for a couple of months, and henceforward it must shift for itself, without any paternal preface. We are not unfeeling-we are not monsters-but we know when to wean our children, as well as when to humour them.

Our Miscellany opens this month with a sonnet from a correspondent, (we thank him for it,) which is fit to shine through any Miscellany in the world. How gentle and soothing it is! How did the writer arrive at it?— We suppose that "Silence was took ere she was ware."

SONNET. SILENCE.

There is a silence where hath been no sound,
There is a silence where no sound may be,
In the cold grave-under the deep deep sea,
Or in wide desart where no life is found,

Which hath been mute, and still must sleep profound;
No voice is hush'd,-no life treads silently,
But clouds and cloudy shadows wander free,
That never spoke-over the idle ground:
But in green ruins, in the desolate walls
Of antique palaces, where Man hath been,
Though the dun fox, or wild hyena, calls,
And owls, that flit continually between,
Shriek to the echo, and the low winds moan,

There the true Silence is, self-conscious and alone. T.

MRS. SIDDONS'S ABRIDGEMENT OF PARADISE LOST.*

Ir much repenteth us that we ever I opened this book, for it painfully proves that Mrs. Siddons can do little things. As an actress she towered in our recollections far above her sex, and seemed to be rather some inspired Goddess of Tragedy, than a mere woman subject to the failings of her kind. Her name ever recalled to mind her magic powers, and you thought rather of Lady Macbeth, than of any one breathing the same air with you. This precious book once opened,-down goes her grandeur, her awful image-like a broken statue! The title page has, indeed, the wondrous name," Mrs. Siddons," but that name is preceded by the title of the book, and what a title!" The Story of our First Parents selected from Milton's Paradise Lost; for the Use of Young Persons!" "Is it come to this?" Has Mrs. Siddons come to this? Could Mrs. Siddons take poor Milton, and thus "first cut the head off, and then hack the limbs?"Could she thus snip up the sublime and beautiful into what Dr. Kitchener would call "thin slices?" Could she really condescend to become an authoress on the strength of an eighteen-penny copy of Paradise Lost, and a pair of scissors? Is Lady Macbeth sunk into the telling of stories about our first parents? Alas! Is Mrs. Siddons, in short, destined to be only "for the use of Young Persons?"

it entire. The reader will make what he can of it.

The following Abridgement of the Paradise Lost was made several years ago for the purpose of being read to my children. A taste for the sublime and beautiful is an approach to virtue; and I was naturally desirous that their minds should be in spired with an early admiration of Milton. The perfection of his immortal Poem is seldom appreciated by the young; and its rather as a duty than a pleasure. This has perusal is, perhaps, very generally regarded been attributed by Dr. Johnson to the want of human interest. In those passages, therefore, which I selected for our evening readings, my purpose was to obviate this objection, by bringing before my family, in uninterrupted connection, those parts which relate to the fate of our first parents; and by omitting every thing, however exquisite in its kind, which did not imme diately bear upon their affecting and important story. Such was the origin of the Without wearying the present volume.

young attention of my auditors, it was calculated to afford occupation and amusement for four evenings, Some friends lately suggested to me, that the Abstract, which had been found interesting and instructive to my own children, might not be wholly unprofitable to those of others; and, in that hope, I have been persuaded to the present publication.

SARAH SIDDONS.

Sarah Siddons! Who is Sarah Siddons? Mercy on us, is this the Christian addition to the grand name of Siddons! With such a plain everyday name, we only wonder how she It is clear that there is something ever awed the town to weep at her. great in the name of Siddons, or Mr. Isabella we could have borne. ConMurray would not suffer his own to stance, Katharine, Volumnia, would follow it on the title page, or to be have been endurable. Belvidera we connected with so miserable a selec- could have worshipped. Indeed we tion as the present. But if anything should have guessed her to be one of were wanting, besides "the ab- these:-but hard Sarah breaks our stract,” to tarnish the brightness of very hearts,-and, do what we will, such a name, the Preface would we cannot get rid of the unchristian amply complete the ruin. The Pre-Christian cognomen; which, indeed, face is truly written in a very feeble and maudlin style, and in the course of about a dozen sentences, it contrives to utter two or three foolish opinions, and two or three erring ones. It is, however, extremely short, and as it is perhaps the only production this lady's pen will ever commit to the press, we shall insert

66

defaces the statue of Tragedy, so long raised in our minds. We grieve at it, as we should at reading, Buy Warren's Blacking on the walls of the Parthenon. The friends who caused this book to be printed have much to answer for. "Oh for a good sound sleep, and so forget it!”

The Story of our First Parents, selected from Milton's Paradise Lost: for the Use of Young Persons. By Mrs. Siddons. London, Murray, 1822.

THOUGHTS ON SCULPTURE.

There is something sublime in the pale repose of fine sculpture: cofour is as noise and motion.-Harlequin is motley and active-but a statue is a thing only of light and shade; and stillness and silence are its proper attributes, and the first inspiration of its presence. On entering the repository of the Elgin Marbles, the voice is instantly subdued to a whisper, and the foot is restrained in its tread; there is no occasion for the written request of the students to preserve silence-it will keep itself, the best peace-officer of the place. We seem to be, not among imitations, but petrifactions of life, and feel as if noise, or mirth, or ungentle motion, were an insult to their constrained quietness. The most im passioned, the most ruffled, are as mute as Niobe when she turned to stone: even that snorting horse, wild and fiery as he may once have been, distends only a breathless nostril to the air, and is fixed for ever. If he move not now, he will never move more, so much he has the look of fierce intent. Theseus sits too, as if he would never rise again; but in him you might fancy it merely the fault of his wills. This

repose seems the proper mood of a statue. It should be pale in act, as pale in substance---either above or beneath all violence---too rock-like to be rudely acted on, or too delicate and aerial, too sylph-like for touchtoo pure even (as it seems) to be stained by the light. I remember a female figure of this nature, which might have been a personification of Silence,--a marble metaphor of Peace. Alone, and still, and hushed, it stood in the dark of a long passage, like an embodied twilight,---not dead, but with such a breathless life as we conceive in a solemn midnight appari tion;---passionless, yet not incapa ble of passion, as if only there was no cause mighty enough in this world to disturb her divine rest. There she stood, with her blank eyes," gazing no one knew whither---not' asleep,---but as in one of those dreams which make up the life of gods, blissful, serene, and eternal--herself almost a dream, she seemed so pale, and shadowy, and unreal--as unreal as if only framed out of moonlight, or (what is quite possible) only the fanciful creation of my own theory.

T.

These blank eyes (wherein there is no indication of the pupil) are the true eyes in sculpture. They seem to hold no communion with your own, but to gaze, not on points, but on all space, like the eyes of gods, or of prophets looking into the future.

ORIGINAL LETTER OF GENERAL WASHINGTON.

The following is an authentic letter from Gen. Washington, to Doctor Cochran, Director-General of the American military hospitals during the revolutionary war. It is a playful and humorous invitation to dinner, and is curious enough, when we

consider it as coming from the emancipator of a hemisphere. It certainly shows that the writer did not justly merit the reproach which has been sometimes cast on him of his possessing a cold and unsocial temper.

West Point, August 16, 1779. Dear Doctor,-I have asked Mrs. Cochran and Mrs. Livingston to dine. with me to-morrow; but ought I not to apprise them of their fare? As I hate deception even where imagination is concerned, I will.

It is needless to premise that my table is large enough to hold the ladies of this they had ocular proof yesterday. To say how it is usually covered, is rather more essential, and this shall be the purport of my letter.

Since my arrival at this happy spot, we have had an ham, sometimes a shoulder of bacon to grace the head of the table-a piece of roast beef adorns the foot, and a small dish of greens or beans (almost imperceptible) decorates the centre. When the cook has a mind to cut a figure (and this, I presume, he will attempt to do to-morrow), we have two beef steak pies or dishes of crabs in addition, one on each side of the centre dish, dividing the space, and reducing the distance between dish and dish to about six feet, which, without them, would be nearly twelve apart. Of late, he has

had the surprising luck to discover that apples will make pies; and it's a question, if, amidst the violence of his efforts, we do not get one of apples instead of having both of beef.

If the ladies can put up with such entertainment, and submit to partake of it on plates, once tin, but now iron (not become so by the labour of scouring) I shall be happy to see them.

To Dr. John Cochran.

I am, dear Sir, your most obedient Servant,
GEORGE WASHINGTON.

MILTON.

MILTON takes his rank in English literature, according to the station which has been determined on by the critics. But he is not read like Lord Byron, or Mr. Thomas Moore. He is not popular; nor perhaps will he ever be. He is known as the Author of Paradise Lost;" but his " Paradise Regained," "severe and beautiful," is little known. Who knows his Arcades? or Samson Agonistes? or half his minor poems? We are persuaded that, however they may be spoken of with respect, few persons, take the trouble to read them. Even

Comus, the child of his youth, his "florid son, young" Comus-is not well known; and for the little renown he may possess, he is indebted to the stage. The following lines (ercepting only the first four) are not printed in the common editions of Milton; nor are they generally known to belong to that divine " Masque;" yet they are in the poet's highest style. We are happy to bring them before such of our readers as are not possessed of Mr. Todd's expensive edition of Milton.

The Spirit enters.

Before the starry threshold of Jove's court
My mansion is, where those immortal shapes
Of bright aërial spirits live insphered
In regions mild of calm and serene air,
Amidst th' Hesperian gardens, on whose banks
Bedew'd with nectar and celestial songs,
Eternal roses grow, and hyacinth,

And fruits of golden rind, on whose fair tree
The scaly harness'd dragon ever keeps
His unenchanted eye: around the verge
And sacred limits of this blissful isle,
The jealous ocean, that old river, winds
His far-extended arms, till with steep fall
Half his waste flood the wild Atlantic fills,
And half the slow unfathom'd Stygian pool.
But soft, I was not sent to court your wonder
With distant worlds, and strange removed climes.
Yet thence I come, and oft from thence behold, &c.

Our readers will forgive us for having modernized the spelling. It is the only liberty that we have taken with our great author's magnificent passage.

COOKE'S EXHIBITION OF DRAWINGS AND ENGRAVINGS.

THERE are many ways, all agreeable, of spending one's money in holiday-time, as our younger readers know. There is, first,-Covent Garden, with its peerless pantomime; and Drury Lane, when Mr. Kean acts; and M. David's picture, which shows us, at once, the Emperor Napoleon, and what the French artists can (and cannot) do; and the Pano

rama, where the Coronation is as good, we are told, as at Westminster, where it originally glittered. There is the Adelphi, the Olympic, Astley's, the Circus, the West London Theatre (with Miss Brunton there), &c. &c. all hanging out their persuasive labels, eliciting sixpences out of 'prentices' pockets, and be guiling the mantua-maker of her

« السابقةمتابعة »