The English Idea of History from Coleridge to CollingwoodAshgate, 2000 - 244 من الصفحات Despite the widely remarked indifference to philosophy of history that has characterized most British historians, important things were said from the early 19th century to the mid 20th about historical knowledge and the nature of human history. This is a study of this distinctively English, Idealist tradition. It connect Coleridge and Carlyle, whose writings have been the focus predominantly of literary scholarship, to thinkers who have been the subjects of philosophers', rather than historians', interest - John Stuart Mill, F.H. Bradley and R.G. Collingwood. It also draws parallels between Idealist thinking about history and postmodernism. |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-3 من 32
الصفحة 96
... exist in that it no longer exists , and the future does not exist in that it does not yet exist ; and there cannot be a causal relationship between nothing and nothing . If we think of cause and effect as in temporal sequence we are in ...
... exist in that it no longer exists , and the future does not exist in that it does not yet exist ; and there cannot be a causal relationship between nothing and nothing . If we think of cause and effect as in temporal sequence we are in ...
الصفحة 97
... exist would rule out all forms of historical knowledge , not just causal chains : if the past is nothing ... exist by the time its effect is created ? This is a temporal problem , and a logical problem , but it has nothing to do ...
... exist would rule out all forms of historical knowledge , not just causal chains : if the past is nothing ... exist by the time its effect is created ? This is a temporal problem , and a logical problem , but it has nothing to do ...
الصفحة 177
... exist , in the sense that they do not currently exist , he suggested that , therefore , we can know neither on the grounds that what we know must exist . Therefore , when we claim to know either the past or the future , we are really ...
... exist , in the sense that they do not currently exist , he suggested that , therefore , we can know neither on the grounds that what we know must exist . Therefore , when we claim to know either the past or the future , we are really ...
المحتوى
Samuel Taylor Coleridge and the Revolt against | 9 |
A Chaos of Being and Heroism | 33 |
History in Mills System of Logic | 61 |
حقوق النشر | |
9 من الأقسام الأخرى غير ظاهرة
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
accept actions approach argued argument behaviour believed Bodleian Library Bosanquet Boucher Bradley Bradley's British idealism Carlyle Carlyle's causal Christian civilised Coleridge Coleridge's Collingwood concept consciousness contemporary course criterion Critical History Croce distinction Dussen empiricism essay evidence example exist experience explanation F.C. Baur F.H. Bradley finite centre French Revolution Froude German Green Hegel Hegelian heroes historian historical fact historical knowledge historical thinking human Hume Hume's Idea of History idealism idealist philosophy individual influence intellectual interest interpretation issue judgement Julius Caesar Kant later laws lectures Logic method Mill mind modern moral narrative nature of historical Oakeshott object past philosophy of history political position positivism positivist postmodernism postmodernist present Presuppositions principle problem progress purpose re-enactment reality recognised relation relationship religion Ritchie role Rubinoff scepticism scientific sense social society spirit T.H. Green teleological theory things thought truth understand universal Vico whilst