The English Idea of History from Coleridge to CollingwoodAshgate, 2000 - 244 من الصفحات Despite the widely remarked indifference to philosophy of history that has characterized most British historians, important things were said from the early 19th century to the mid 20th about historical knowledge and the nature of human history. This is a study of this distinctively English, Idealist tradition. It connect Coleridge and Carlyle, whose writings have been the focus predominantly of literary scholarship, to thinkers who have been the subjects of philosophers', rather than historians', interest - John Stuart Mill, F.H. Bradley and R.G. Collingwood. It also draws parallels between Idealist thinking about history and postmodernism. |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-3 من 26
الصفحة 147
... explanation . In rejecting causal explanation for history , Oakeshott first rejected those overarching forms of causal explanation that , as he put it , explain everything or nothing , such as God's purpose . Such an explanation was ...
... explanation . In rejecting causal explanation for history , Oakeshott first rejected those overarching forms of causal explanation that , as he put it , explain everything or nothing , such as God's purpose . Such an explanation was ...
الصفحة 148
... explanation he had to put some form of historical explanation in its place . Elsewhere , he considered , and rejected , other types of relationships between historical events . He rejected the method of comparison : ' a search for ...
... explanation he had to put some form of historical explanation in its place . Elsewhere , he considered , and rejected , other types of relationships between historical events . He rejected the method of comparison : ' a search for ...
الصفحة 149
... explanation , one can only reply that , in an unphilosophical world , we ignore the practical world at our peril , and that Oakeshott never seems to take account of the reader , only the author . Similarly , in the historical past there ...
... explanation , one can only reply that , in an unphilosophical world , we ignore the practical world at our peril , and that Oakeshott never seems to take account of the reader , only the author . Similarly , in the historical past there ...
المحتوى
Samuel Taylor Coleridge and the Revolt against | 9 |
A Chaos of Being and Heroism | 33 |
History in Mills System of Logic | 61 |
حقوق النشر | |
9 من الأقسام الأخرى غير ظاهرة
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
accept actions approach argued argument behaviour believed Bodleian Library Bosanquet Boucher Bradley Bradley's British idealism Carlyle Carlyle's causal Christian civilised Coleridge Coleridge's Collingwood concept consciousness contemporary course criterion Critical History Croce distinction Dussen empiricism essay evidence example exist experience explanation F.C. Baur F.H. Bradley finite centre French Revolution Froude German Green Hegel Hegelian heroes historian historical fact historical knowledge historical thinking human Hume Hume's Idea of History idealism idealist philosophy individual influence intellectual interest interpretation issue judgement Julius Caesar Kant later laws lectures Logic method Mill mind modern moral narrative nature of historical Oakeshott object past philosophy of history political position positivism positivist postmodernism postmodernist present Presuppositions principle problem progress purpose re-enactment reality recognised relation relationship religion Ritchie role Rubinoff scepticism scientific sense social society spirit T.H. Green teleological theory things thought truth understand universal Vico whilst