Ainsi que les Taupinembous- Doit prendre de moy tablature!" The perpetual employments of Death display copious invention with a facility of humour. "Egalement je vay rengeant, Le counseiller et le sergeant, Dame Luce, dame Perrette, &c. J'en prends un dans le temps qu'il pleure Je donne le coup qui le frit. J'en prends un, pendant qu'il se leve; L'un aujourd'hui, l'autre le demain. * Tablaturé d'un luth, Cotgrave says, is the belly of a luté, meaning "all in nature must dance to my music!" J'en surprends un le ventre plein Entre le blanc et le clairet, Le jour qu'elle prend medecine." This veil of gaiety in the old canon of Ambrun covers deeper and more philosophical thoughts than the singular mode of treating so solemn a theme. He has introduced many scenes of human life, which still interest, and he addresses the "Teste à triple couronne," as well as the "forsat de galere," who exclaims, "Laissez moi vivre dans mes fers," "le gueu," the "bourgeois," 66 the chanoine," the "pauvre soldat," the "medecin," in a word, all ranks in life are exhibited, as in all the "dances of death." But our object of noticing these burlesque paintings and poems is to show, that after the monkish Goths had opened one general scene of melancholy and tribulation over Europe, and given birth to that dismal skeleton of death, which still terrifies the imagination of many, a re-action of feeling was experienced by the populace, who at length came to laugh at the gloomy spectre which had so long terrified them! 316 THE RIVAL BIOGRAPHERS OF HEYLIN. PETER HEYLIN was one of the popular writers of his times, like FULLER and HOWELL, who, devoting their amusing pens to subjects which deeply interested their own busy age, will not be slighted by the curious. We have nearly outlived their divinity, but not their politics. Metaphysical absurdities are luxuriant weeds which must be cut down by the scythe of Time; but the great passions branching from the tree of life are still "growing with our growth." There are two biographies of our HEYLIN, which led to a literary quarrel of an extraordinary nature; and, in the progress of its secret history, all the feelings of rival authorship were called out. HEYLIN died in 1662. Dr. Barnard, his sonin-law, and a scholar, communicated a sketch of the author's life to be prefixed to a posthumous folio, of which Heylin's son was the editor. This life was given by the son, but anonymously, which may not have gratified the author, the son-in-law. Twenty years had elapsed when, in 1682, appeared "The Life of Dr. Peter Heylin, by George Vernon." The writer, alluding to the prior life prefixed to the posthumous folio, asserts, that in borrowing something from Barnard, Barnard had also "Excerpted passages out of my papers, the very words as well as matter, when he had them in his custody, as any reader may discern who will be at the pains of comparing the life now published with what is extant before the Keimalea Ecclesiastica," the quaint, pedantic title, after the fashion of the day, of the posthumous folio. This strong accusation seemed countenanced by a dedication to the son and the nephew of Heylin. Roused now into action, the indignant Barnard soon produced a more complete Life, to which he prefixed A necessary Vindication." This is an unsparing castigation of Vernon, the literary pet whom the Heylins had fondled in preference to their learned relative. The long smothered family grudge, the suppressed mortifications of literary pride, after the subterraneous grumblings of twenty years, now burst out, and the volcanic particles flew about in |