« السابقةمتابعة »
was his conduct in his prætorship here at home? Let the plundered temples, and public works, neglected (that he might embezzle the money intended for carrying them on) bear witness. How did he discharge the office of a judge ? Let those who suffered by his injustice answer. But his prætorship in Sicily crowns all his works of wickedness, and finishes a lasting monument to his infamy. The nuschief done by him in that unbappy country, during the three years of his iniquitous administration, are such, that many years, under the wisest and best of prætors, will not be sufficient to restore things to the condition in which he found them; for, it is notorious, that during the time of his tyranny, the Sicilians neither enjoyed the protection of their own original laws, of the regulations made for their benefit by the Roman Senate, upon their coming under the protection of the commonwealth, nor of the natural and unalienable rights of men. His nod has decided all causes in Sicily for these three years : and his decisions have broke all law, all precedent, all right. The sums he has, by arbitrary taxes and unheard of impositions, extorted from the industrious poor, are not to be computed. Tlie inost faithful allies of the commonwealth have been treated as enemies. Roman citizens have, like slaves, been put to death with tortures. The most atrocious criminals, for money, have been exempted from the de served punishments; and men of the most unexceptionable characters, condeinned and banished unheard. The harbours, though sufficiently fortified, and the gates of strong towns opened to pirates and ravagers. The soldiery and sailors, belonging to a province under the protection of the commonwealth, starved to death. Whole fleets, to the great detriment of the province, suffered to perish. The ancient monuments of either Sicilian or Roman greatness, the stalues of heroes and princes carried off'; and the temples stripped of their images. Having, by his iniquitous sentences, filled the prisons with the most industrious and deserving of the people, he then proceeded to order numbers of Roman citizens to be strangled in the gaols; so that the exclamation, “lam a citizen of Rome !" which has often, in the most distant regions, and among the most barbarous people, been a protection, was
of no service to them; but on the contrary, brought a speedier and more severe punishment upon them.
I ask now, Verres, what you have to advance against this charge? Will you pretend to deny it? Will you pretend that any thing false, that even any thing aggravated, is alledged against you? Had any prince, or any state, committed the saine outrage against the privilege of Roman citizens, should we not think we had sufficient ground for declaring immediate war against them? What punishment ought then to be inflicted upon a tyrannical and wicked prætor, who dared, at no greater distance than Sicily, within sight of the Italian coast, to put to the infamous death of crucifixion, that unfortunate and innocent citizen, Publius Gavious Cosanus, only for his having asserted his privilege of citizenship, and declared his intention of appealing to the justice of his country, against a cruel oppressor, who had unjustly confined him in prison, at Syracusa, whence he had just made his escape? The unliappy man, arrested as he was going to embark for his native country, is brought before the wicked prætor. With eyes darting fury, and a countenance distorted with cruelty, he orders the helpless victim of his rage to be stripped, and rods to be brought; accusing him, but without the least shadow of evidence, or even of suspicion, of having come to Sicily as a spy. It was in vain that the unhappy man cried out, "I am a Roman citizen: I have served under Lucius Pretius, who is now at Panormous, and will attesi my innocence," The blood thirsty prætor, deaf to all he could urge in his own defence, ordered the infamous punishment to be inflicted. Thus, Fathers, was an innocent Roman citizen publicly mangled with scourging; whilst the only words he uttered amidst his cruel sufferings, were, “I am a Roman citizen !” With these he hoped to defend himself from violence and infamy. But of so little service was this privilege to him, that while he was thus asserting his citizenship, the order was given for his execution-for his execution upon the cross !
O liberty !-O sound once delightful to every Roman ear!-- sacred privilege of Roman citizenship !-once sacred !--now trampled upon !- but what then !- Is it come to this ? Shall an inferiour magistrate, a governour, who holds his whole power of the Roman people in a Roma
province, within sight of Italy, bind, scourge, torture with fire, and red hot plates of iron, and at last put to the infamous death of the cross, a Roman citizen ? Shall neither the cries of innocence, expiring in agony, nor the tears of pityiog spectators, nor the majesty of the Roman com. monwealth, nor the fear of the justice of his country, restrain the licentious and wanton cruelty of a mouster, who, in confidence of his riches, strikes at the root of liberty, and sets mankind at defiance ?
I conclude with expressing my hopes, that your wisdom and justice, Fathers, will not, by suffering the attrecious and unexampled irisolence of Caius Verres to escape the due punishment, leave room to apprehend the danger of a total subversion of authority, and introduction of general anarchy and confusion.
II.-Cicero for Milo. MY LORDS,
THAT you may be able the more easily to determinc upon this point before you, I shall beg the favour of an aitentive hearing, while, in a few words, I lay open the whole affair.- Clodius being determined, when created prætor, to harrass his country with every species of oppression, and finding the comitia had been delayed so long the year before, that he could not hold this office many months, all on a sudden threw up his own year, and reserved himself to the next; not from any religious scruple, but that he might have, as he said himself, a full, entire year for exercising his prætorship; that is, for overturning the cominonwealth. Being sensible he must be controuled and cramped in the exercise of his prætorian authority under Milo, who, he plainly saw, would be chosen consul, by the unanimous consent of the Roman people; he joined the candidates that opposed Milo, but in such a manner that he overruled them in every thing, had the sole management of the election, and, as he often used to boast, bore all the comilia upon his own shoulders.
He assembled the tribes; he thrust himself into their councils; and formed a new ribe of the most abandoned of the citizens, The more confusion and slisiurbance he made, the more Milo prevailed. When this wretch, who was bent upon all manner of wickedness, saw that so brave a man, and
his most inveterate enemy, would certainly be consul; when he perceived this, not only by the discourses, but by the votes of the Roman people, he began to throw off all disguise, and to declare openly that Milo must be killed. He often intimated this in the Senate, and declared it expressly before the people; insomuch that when Favonious, that brave man, asked him what prospect he could have of carrying on his furious designs, while Milo was alive--he replied, that in three or four days at most he should be taken out of the way; which reply Favonius immediately communicated to Cato.
In the mean time, as soon as Clodius knew (nor indeed was there any difficulty to come to the iutelligence) that Milo was obliged by the 18th of January to be at Lanuvivin, where he was dictator, in order to nominate a priest, a duty which the laws rendered necessary to be performs ed every year; he went suddenly from Rome the day before, in order, as appears by the events, to waylay Milo, on his own grounds; and this at a time when he was 0bliged to leave a tumultuous assembly which he had summoned that very day, where his presence was necessary to carry on his mad designs; a thing he never would have done, if he had not been desirous to take the advantage of that particular time and place, for perpetrating his villany. But Milo, after having staid in the Senate that day till the house was broke up, went home, changed his clothes, waited a while, as usual, till his wife had got ready to atlend him, and then set forward, about the time that Clodius, if he had proposed to come back to Rome that day, might have returned. He meets Clodius near his own ese tate, a little before sunset, and is immediately attacked by a body of men, who throw their darls at him from an eminence, and kill his coachman. Upon which he threw off his cloak, leaped from his chariot, and defended him self with great bravery. In the mean time Clodius' at. tendants drawing their swords, some of them ran back to the chariot, in order to attack Milo in the rear; whilst others thinking that he was already killed, fell upon his servants who were behind; these being resolute and faithful to their master, were some of them, slain.;. whilst the rest, seeing a warm engagement near the chariot, being; prevented from going to their master's assistance, hearing besides from Clodius himself, that Milo was killed, and believing it to be a fact, acted upon this occasion (I mention it not with a view to elude the accusation, but because it was the true state of the case) without the orders, without the knowledge, without the presence of their master, as every man would wish his own servants should act in the like circunstances.
This, my Lords, is a faithful account of the inatter of fact; the person who lay in wait was himself overcoine, and force subdued by force, or rather audaciousness chas. tised by uue valouro I say nothing of the advantage which accrues to the state in general, to yourselves in particular, and to all good men; I am content to wave the argument I might draw from hence in favour of my client
, whose destiny was so peculiar, that he could not secure his own safety, without securing yours, and that of the republic at the same time. If he could not do it lawfully, there is no room for attempling his defence. But if reason teaches the learned, necessity the barbarian, common custom all nations in general, and even nature itself instructs the brutes to defend their bodies, limbs and lives when attacked, by all possible methods, you cannot pronounce this action criminal, without deterinining, at the same time, that whoever falls into the hands of a highwayman, must of necessity perish either of the sword or your decisions. Had Milo been of this opinion, he would certainly have chosen to have fallen by the hands of Clodius, who had more than once before this, made an attempt upon
his life, rather than be executed by your order, because he had not tamely yielded himself a victim to his rage.
But if none of you are of this opinion, the proper question is, * not whether Clodius was killed; for that we grant: But
whether justly or unjustly. If it appears that Milo was the aggressor, we ask no favour; but if Clodius, you will then acquit him of the crime that has been laid to his charge.
What method, then, can we take to prove that Clodius lay in wait for Mile ? It is sufficient, considering what an audacious abandoned wretch he was, to show that he lay under a strong templation to it, that he formed great hopes, and proposed to himself great advantages, from Milo's death. By Milo's death, Clodius would not only have gain. ed his point of being prætor, without that restraint which his adversary's power as consul, would have laid upon