صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني

We are by no means for defending the difingenuous and huffling behaviour of theatrical managers, but when a man is accufed of a conduct fo infidious, that Mr. Garrick's, in the fame line, is comparatively generous and princely, it makes one fhudder to think of its comparative bafeness. Our biographer fays, that the bare expofition of the fact is fufficient, and there needs no commentary to explain that expofition Now we think that, fuppofing the fact fairly ftated, the inference by no means follows. Were the doors of Covent garden theatre barred against Henderson for ever, because Harris declared he must then decline entering into any treaty with him-Our Biographer, indeed, has not printed the word now in italics or fmall capitals, with the reft of the fentence; but it is legible enough in plain Roman, and is fufficiently ftrong and expreffive.-Mr. Harris could not at that time engage Mr. Henderfon; ergo, fays our Biographer, he was excluded for ever. Certainly this fage cafuift muft have learnt to chop logic of the Graver-diggers in Hamlet: argyl we thall here take leave of the reft of his narrative, and the wife faws and fagacious fentences, with which it is occafionally interFarded.

For the fake of Mr. Henderson himfelf, who has undoubt edly great merit as an actor, we hope he was not acceffary to the publication of this piece of biography, as the writer gives us reafon to think, throughout the whole. Whatever truth it may contain, the publication of it was ill-judged; for the truth, whatever the refpectable Mr. Thomas Davies may fay, is not to be spoken at all times.

[ocr errors]

The History of Great Britain, from the first Invasion of it by the Romans under Julius Cæfar. Written on a new Plan. By Robert Henry, D. D. one of the Minifters of Edingburgh. Volume the Third. 11. Is. Cadell.

As the two first volumes of this work were published before the commencement of our Review, it may not be improper to inform our readers, that what Dr. Henry means by writing his hiftory on a new plan, is that, instead of giving all the events, civil, military, literary, commercial, &c. in one continued narrative, he divides them into different fections, and finifhes the account of one kind of incidents before he enters pon the relation of another,

The

The heads, or Chapters, into which he has divided his work, are thefe-1. The Civil and Military Hiftory of Great Britain. 2. The Hiftory of Religion in Great Britain. 3. Hiftory of Conftitution, Government, and Laws of Great Britain. 4. The Hiftory of Learning. 5. Hiftory of the Arts. 6. Hiftory of Commerce, Coin, and Shipping. 7. The Hiftory of the Manners, Virtues, Vices, remarkable Cuftoms, Language, Drefs, Diet and Diverfions of the People of Great Britain. The whole is concluded with an Appendix, containing a copy of Magna Charta, with an English tranflation, a Latin Epiftle from Peter of Blois to one of his friends on a medical fubject; and the permiffion of Richard I. for holding tournaments in England. 1 his volume reaches from the Conqueft to the death of King John, that is, from the year 1066 to 1216.

It is not to be fuppofed that, after the great number of Hiftories of England already publifhed, Dr. Henry fhould be able to throw any additional light on the civil or military part of our annals; and accordingly we do not find, that his reprefentation of these transactions differs effentially from that given by other writers. But it might naturally be thought, that he fhould at least have entertained us with fome curious anecdotes relative to the learning, arts, and manners of our anceftors, especially as the method he has adopted, furnishes him with an opportunity of mentioning feveral minute and detached circumftances, which could not perhaps be fo properly introduced into a history written on the ufual plan. Of thefe, however, juftice obliges us to confefs, we have met with a much fmaller number, than, from the apparent diligence and induftry of the author, we were at first led to expect; and hence it is natural to conclude, that the English records do not abound with particulars of this kind. We fhall present our Readers with the most remarkable that have occurred to us in the perufal of this work, after taking notice of fome facts of a more general and interefting nature.

In page 352, Dr. Henry tells us, on the authority of Ordericus Vitalis, who was born in England only nine years after the Conqueft, that the revenue of William I, amounted to the incredible fum of 1061. 10. 1d. per day, which (neglecting the fraction) was equal in efficacy to 15,9154. of our money per day, and to 5,808,975 per year. "This account, fays he, extravagant as it may appear, is not very different from that which is given by Roger Hoveden, a contemporary hiftorian, of the revenues of England in the reign of Richard I. When Hubert, Arbishop of Canterbury was about to refign VOL. VI.

3 A

the

the office of High Jufticiary A. D. 1196, he proved from his books, that the revenue he had collected in England in the two preceding years, was no leis than eleven thousand marks of filver; a great fun, equivalent to 11,000,000 at the above rate of computation, in two years, or 5,500,000 in one year.

What Dr. Henry means by "the above rate of computa tion," he explains afterwards, p. 545, 6 and 7, where he examines the opinion of Mr. Hume and that of Lord Lyttelton with regard to the value of money, in the eleventh and twelfth centuries, compared to what it is at prefent. Both thefe writers agree, that any nominal fum of money contained nearly three times as much filver, in the former of thefe periods, as it does in the latter; for as to gold-coin, it was not then come, into ufe. But they differ widely with regard to the quantity of provifions which a piece of moncy, of the fame weight, (fuppofe, for inftance, a piece of the weight of one of our crowns) would have purchafed then, in comparison of what it will purchate at prefent. Mr. Hume thinks it would have purchased ten times as much then, as it will now; whereas Lord Lyttelton imagines, it would only have purchafed five times as much. Dr. Henry flows, from an induction of particulars, that, of the two opinions, Lord Lyttelton's is the beft founded; and it is according to his principles, that he forms his calculation.

The Dr. entertains an opinion, which, we apprehend, will rather be deemed heterodox, with respect to the antiquity of juries in England. They feem (he fays, p. 357) to have been introduced in the reign of William I.: where, as it is the opinion of almost all our hiftorians, antiquaries, and law-writers, that they were eftablifhed here in the reign of king Alfred, if not before. As a fpecimen of the logical fubtilties, which were fo common in the fchools, he gives us the following curious queftion, which was very ferioufly agitated by fome of the most learned Doctors of the age.-"When a hog is carried to market with a rope about his neck, which is held at the other end by a man, whether is the hog carried to market by the rope or by the man ?"

Nor was the age lefs remarkable for credulity than quibbling; witnefs the following ridiculous ftory, related, with great gravity, by Giraldus Cambrenfis, in his topography of When St. Kewen (iays he) was one day praying with both her hands held up to Heaven, out of the window of her chamber, a fwallow laid an egg in one of them; and fuch

ireland.

was

was the patience and good-nature of the faint, that fhe neither drew in nor fhut her hand till the fwallow had built her neft, laid all her eggs, and hatched her young. To preterve the rememb ance of this fact, every ftatue of St. Kewen in Ireland hath a wallow in one of its hands."

Dr. Henry is high in his praifes of Chivalry, on account of the virtues it recommended; among which he reckons modefty and chastity; and yet he fays the Normans, by whom this institution was brought into England, were fo licentious in their manners, that they violated the honour of maids and matrons, whenever they had an opportunity, and that young women even of the firit families, had no other chance of preferving their virtue, than by putting on the veil, and taking refuge in a nun ery. Hence it appears, that the precepts of chivalry, like thote of morality and religion, however beautiful in theory, w re not very cafily put in practice.

The English, in the eleventh and twelfth centuries, had had only two fred meals a day, dinner and fupper; the former a nine in the forenoon, the latter at five in the afternoon. Thefe hours, befides being convenient for bufine's, were fuppofed to be friendly to health and leng life, according to the following verfes, which were then often repeated;

Lever a cinq, diner a neuf,
Souper a cinq, coucher a neuf,
Fait vivre d'ans nonante & neuf.
To rife at feven, to dine at nine,
To up at five, to bed at nine,
Makes a man live to ninety-nine.

We are not however, on that account to imagine, that they were either enemies or ftrangers to the pleatures of the table, On the contrary, they had not only a variety of dishes; but there too confifted of the most delicate kinds of food, and were dreffed in the richeft and moft coftly manner. Thomas a Becket is faid to have given five pounds, equivalent to feventy-five pounds at prefent, for one dith of eels

The Monks of St Swithins, at Winchefter, made a formal complaint to Henry II. against their Abbot, for taking away three, of the thirteen difhes, they used to have every day, at dinner. The Monks of Canterbury were ftill more luxurious: for they had at least feventeen difhes every day; befides a deffert; and thefe difles were dreffed with ipiceries and fauces, which excited the appetite, as well as pleated the tale.

As to the compolition of this work we fhall only observe, that the ftyle is plain and perfpicuous, though perhaps it is

3 A

fome

fomewhat deficient in dignity; and though Dr. Henry poffeffes neither the elegance of a Robertfon, nor the vigour or penetration of a Hume, he yet deferves the character of a well-informed, faithful, and fenfible hiftorian.

A.

Travels for the Heart. Written in France, by Courtney Mel moth, 2 vols. 12mo. 6s. Wallis.

Written in France! A pretty recommendation truly!— Or perhaps the author means it as an apology. If the latter, it argues at leaft the merit of modefty, as well as fome degree of felf-knowledge. To fay the truth, we are forry that our commendations cannot keep pace with the productions of this once-proinifing writer. In fact, thefe follow each other fo rapidly, that we hope their author hath not much need of either viuals, drink, or fleep; for we cannot but conceive he muft otherwife be deprived of his natural support, and that his ftrength of body muft fail under the inceffant labour of his imagination. The prefent travels in particular have all the appearance of being penned as they were performed, per diligence and per post: they are, of courfe, of fuch a kind as might naturally be expected; as he that runs may read, what he that rides muft write-We are glad at heart, however, for the honour of our country, that thefe frivolities are the product of their proper foil. We are perfuaded, that in England even the pen of Mr. Melmoth, though writing poft, would carry more weight. And yet he hath already acquired fo much Glic affrontery, as to attempt a juftification of them in his preface, and to endeavour to pais thefe exotic levities on his own countrymen as worthy their attention. "The motive," fays he, " by which I am urged to write a preface to this little book of running remarks, is, chiefly, to enter a caveat against a charge, which precipitate readers may be pleased to bring against it, upon account of my having admitted trifles, that, at first fight, feem not worthy fo much notice."-If it were poffible to meet with a reader more precipitate than the writer, his caveat might not be thrown away. To others it is fuperfluous and fertile; as they must be very fuperficial readers, indeed, who, on the lighteft attention, do not find it engaged on very trifles. As this author, however, has a pcculiar knack at manufacturing this kind of literary haberdathery, we cannot refufe him the juftice of laying before our readers, what he has to fay in favour of it,

"Were

« السابقةمتابعة »