The English Idea of History from Coleridge to CollingwoodAshgate, 2000 - 244 من الصفحات Despite the widely remarked indifference to philosophy of history that has characterized most British historians, important things were said from the early 19th century to the mid 20th about historical knowledge and the nature of human history. This is a study of this distinctively English, Idealist tradition. It connect Coleridge and Carlyle, whose writings have been the focus predominantly of literary scholarship, to thinkers who have been the subjects of philosophers', rather than historians', interest - John Stuart Mill, F.H. Bradley and R.G. Collingwood. It also draws parallels between Idealist thinking about history and postmodernism. |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-3 من 57
الصفحة 147
... issues . With the first he must surely have finally disposed of an issue which , it might be thought , had dogged idealist philosophy of history - and indeed history itself - for too long , namely the question of free will . His ...
... issues . With the first he must surely have finally disposed of an issue which , it might be thought , had dogged idealist philosophy of history - and indeed history itself - for too long , namely the question of free will . His ...
الصفحة 163
... issues as well , were not really attempting a full understanding of Collingwood but were pursuing their own ... issue almost as fraught as that of Coleridge or Carlyle and the German idealists . Connelly concludes that Croce was ...
... issues as well , were not really attempting a full understanding of Collingwood but were pursuing their own ... issue almost as fraught as that of Coleridge or Carlyle and the German idealists . Connelly concludes that Croce was ...
الصفحة 202
... issue via the concept of the finite centre , but could not accept the notion that we could have direct knowledge of the mind of Julius Caesar . So what , if any , were the limitations that Collingwood placed upon his own method ? Only ...
... issue via the concept of the finite centre , but could not accept the notion that we could have direct knowledge of the mind of Julius Caesar . So what , if any , were the limitations that Collingwood placed upon his own method ? Only ...
المحتوى
Samuel Taylor Coleridge and the Revolt against | 9 |
A Chaos of Being and Heroism | 33 |
History in Mills System of Logic | 61 |
حقوق النشر | |
9 من الأقسام الأخرى غير ظاهرة
طبعات أخرى - عرض جميع المقتطفات
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
accept actions approach argued argument behaviour believed Bodleian Library Bosanquet Boucher Bradley Bradley's British idealism Carlyle Carlyle's causal Christian civilised Coleridge Coleridge's Collingwood concept consciousness contemporary course criterion Critical History Croce distinction Dussen empiricism essay evidence example exist experience explanation F.C. Baur F.H. Bradley finite centre French Revolution Froude German Green Hegel Hegelian heroes historian historical fact historical knowledge historical thinking human Hume Hume's Idea of History idealism idealist philosophy individual influence intellectual interest interpretation issue judgement Julius Caesar Kant later laws lectures Logic method Mill mind modern moral narrative nature of historical Oakeshott object past philosophy of history political position positivism positivist postmodernism postmodernist present Presuppositions principle problem progress purpose re-enactment reality recognised relation relationship religion Ritchie role Rubinoff scepticism scientific sense social society spirit T.H. Green teleological theory things thought truth understand universal Vico whilst