-The Third Stage-Similar Evolution of Set- ting in the History of Fiction-The First Stage -The Second Stage-The Third Stage: 1. Set- ting as an Aid to Action-2. Setting as an Aid to Characterization-Emotional Harmony in Set- ting-The Pathetic Fallacy-Emotional Con- trast in Setting-Irony in Setting-Artistic and Philosophical Employment-1. Setting as a Mo- tive toward Action-2. Setting as an Influence on Character-Setting as the Hero of the Narra- tive-Uses of the Weather-Romantic and Realistic Settings-A Romantic Setting by Edgar Allan Poe-A Realistic Setting by George VII. THE POINT OF VIEW IN NARRATIVE 120 The Importance of the Point of View-Two Classes, the Internal and the External-I. Sub- divisions of the First Class: 1. The Point of View of the Leading Actor; 2. The Point of View of Some Subsidiary Actor; 3. The Points of View of Different Actors; 4. The Epistolary Point of View-II. Subdivisions of the Second Class: 1. The Omniscient Point of View; 2. The Limited Point of View; 3. The Rigidly Restricted Point of View-Two Tones of Narrative, Impersonal and Personal: 1. The Impersonal Tone; 2. The Personal Tone-The Point of View as a Factor Essential and Contributory Features-Art Distinguishes between the Two by Emphasis -Many Technical Devices: 1. Emphasis by Terminal Position; 2. Emphasis by Initial Posi- tion; 3. Emphasis by Pause [Further Discus- sion of Emphasis by Position]; 4. Emphasis by Direct Proportion; 5. Emphasis by Inverse Pro- portion; 6. Emphasis by Iteration; 7. Emphasis by Antithesis; 8. Emphasis by Climax; 9. Em- Mood-1. Influence of the Actor; 2. Influence of the Theatre; 3. Influence of the Audience.- X. THE NOVEL, THE NOVELETTE, AND Novel, Novelette, and Short-Story-The Novel and the Novelette-The Short-Story a Distinct Type-The Dictum of Poe-The Formula of Brander Matthews-Definition of the Short- Story-Explanation of this Definition-1. "Single Narrative Effect"; 2. "Greatest Econ- omy of Means"; and 3. "Utmost Emphasis". Brief Tales That Are Not Short-Stories-Short- Stories That Are Not Brief-Bliss Perry's Anno- tations-The Novelist and the Writer of Short- Stories-The Short-Story More Artistic Than the Novel-The Short-Story Almost Necessarily Ro- mantic. Only One Best Way to Construct a Short- Story-Problems of Short-Story Construction -The Initial Position-The Terminal Position -Poe's Analysis of "The Raven"-Analysis of Structure and Style-Style a Matter of Feeling -Style an Absolute Quality-The Twofold Appeal of Language-Concrete Examples- Onomatopoetic Words-Memorable Words- -The Patterning of Syllables-Stevenson on Style-The Pattern of Rhythm-The Pattern of Literation-Style a Fine Art-Style an Im- portant Aid to Fiction-The Heresy of the Acci- dental-Style an Intuitive Quality-Methods and Materials-Content and Form-The Fusion INTRODUCTION I IN OUR time, in these early years of the twentieth century, the novel is the prosperous parvenu of literature, and only a few of those who acknowledge its vogue and who laud its success take the trouble to recall its humble beginnings and the miseries of its youth. But like other parvenus it is still a little uncertain of its position in the society in which it moves. It is a newcomer in the literary world; and it has the self-assertiveness and the touchiness natural to the situation. It brags of its descent, although its origins are obscure. It has won its way to the front and it has forced its admission into circles where it was formerly denied access. It likes to forget that it was once but little better than an outcast, unworthy of recognition from those in authority. Perhaps it is still uneasily conscious that not a few of those who were born to good society may look at it with cold suspicion as though it was still on sufferance. Story-telling has always been popular, of course; and the desire is deep-rooted in all of us to hear and to tell some new thing and to tell again something deserving remembrance. But the novel itself, and the short-story also, must confess that they have only of late been able to claim equality with the epic and the lyric, and with comedy and tragedy, literary forms consecrated by antiquity. There were nine Muses in Greece of old, and no one of these daughters of Apollo was expected to inspire the writer of prose-fiction. Whoever had then a story to tell, which he wished to treat artistically, never dreamed of expressing it except in the nobler medium of verse, in the epic, in the idyl, in the drama. Prose seemed to the Greeks, and even to the Latins who followed in their footsteps, as fit only for pedestrian purposes. Even oratory and history were almost rhythmic; and mere prose was too humble an instrument for those whom the Muses cherished. The Alexandrian vignettes of the gentle Theocritus may be regarded as anticipations of the modern short-story of urban local color; but this delicate idyllist used verse for the talk of his Tanagra figurines. Even when the modern languages entered into the inheritance of Latin and Greek, verse held to its ances tral privileges, and the brief tale took the form of the ballad, and the longer narrative called itself a chanson de geste. Boccaccio and Rabelais and Cervantes might win immediate popularity and invite a host of imitators; but it was long after their time before a tale in prose. whether short or long, achieved recognition as worthy of serious critical consideration. In his study of Balzac, Brunetière recorded the significant fact that no novelist, who was purely and simply a novelist, was elected to the French Academy in the first two centuries of its existence. And the same acute critic, in his "History of Classical French Literature," pointed out that French novels were under a cloud of suspicion even so far back as the days of Erasmus, in 1525. It was many scores of years thereafter before the self-appointed guardians of French literature esteemed the novel highly enough to condescend to discuss it. Perhaps this was not altogether a disadvantage. French tragedy was discussed only too abundantly; and the theorists laid down rules for it which were not a little cramping. Another French critic, M. Le Breton, in his account of the growth of French prose-fiction in the first half of the nineteenth century, has asserted that this exemption from criticism really redounded to the benefit of the novel, since the despised form was allowed to develop naturally, spontaneously, free from all the many artificial restrictions which the dogmatists succeeded in imposing on tragedy and on comedy, and which resulted at last in the sterility of the French drama toward the end of the eighteenth century and the beginning of the nineteenth. While this advantage is undeniable, one may question whether it was not bought at too great a price and whether there would not have been a certain profit for prose-fiction if its practitioners had been kept up to the mark by a criticism which educated the public to demand greater care in structure, more logic in the conduct of events, and stricter veracity in the treatment of characters. However much it might then be deemed unworthy of serie consideration, the novel in the eighteenth century began to attract to itself more and more authors of rich natural endowment. In English literature especially, prose-fiction tempted men as unlike as Defoe and Swift, Richardson and Fielding, Smollett and Sterne, Goldsmith and Johnson. And a little earlier the eighteenth century essayists, with Steele and Addison at the head of them, had developed the art of character-delineation, a development out of which the novelists were to make their profit. The influence of the English eighteenth-century essay on the growth of prose-fiction, not only in the British Isles, but also on the continent of Europe, is larger than is generally admitted. Indeed, there is a sense in which the successive papers depicting the character and the deeds of Sir Roger de Coverley may be accepted as the earliest of serial stories. But it was only in the nineteenth century that the |