The Babylonian Expedition of the University of Pennsylvania: Cuneiform textsDepartment of Archaelogy, University of Pennsylvania., 1910 |
طبعات أخرى - عرض جميع المقتطفات
مقاطع مشهورة
الصفحة 15 - THE AMHERST PAPYRI. Being an Account of the Greek Papyri in the Collection of the Right Hon. Lord Amherst of Hackney, FSA, at Didlington Hall, Norfolk.
الصفحة 4 - Hence some time must have elapsed between the end of the first dynasty and the beginning of the rule of the third over Babylon.
الصفحة 4 - ... such dynasties as we know actually controlled Babylon, would be difficult to explain, if not at any time some one of these kings ruled in Babylon. But, of course, this does neither prove nor disprove the supposition that Babylon for a time at least was included in the domain of the second dynasty. But I am inclined to think that too much importance has been placed on the question, whether this dynasty ruled in Babylon or not. In itself it does not solve the problem of the relation between the...
الصفحة 32 - Of course, the date on the envelope must have been made after the tablet was enclosed, hence later. In any case there must be some mistake on the envelope. Perhaps the scribe wrote mu for mu us-sa. The explanation offered by Pinches, that the en Kar-zi(d)-da formula must designate the 2d year of Gimil-Sin, and has to be taken away from Bur-Sin, cannot be maintained. It would upset the whole order of dates. If, however, the date of the envelope really is meant for the last year of BurSin, ie, the...
الصفحة 14 - Assyriologie) a part of the 4th, the 5th and 6th series date from the Ur period. Virolleaud edited a small volume of Ur texts, principally documents, of which the texts had been published before, but which he now transliterated and translated under the title Comptabilite Chaldeenne, Parts I and II, Poitiers, 1903, and in the same year another small volume of similar texts, likewise published before by Scheil and Thureau-Dangin, entitled Di-tilla, textes juridiques chaldeennes, Poitiers, 1903.
الصفحة 67 - Aa-du-na(d). 24 sheep, 268 virile sheep, 20 female kid goats, young ones grown up, 15 male offspring, 340 sheep (and) lambs, from (with) Ur-zage. 154 sheep, among them 10 lambs of the fold, are 135 young ones born. 48 goats, 45 (46?) young ones born, 382 young ones of sheep and goats from (with) Dabia. 42 sheep, 7 virile sheep, 58 female kid goats, 41 male kid goats, 38 young ones born 3goats, 1That BI-A is to be read h& is seen from the gloss, C. T., XXV, 20a, 2; RMA, PI.
الصفحة 5 - Babylonia/7 among the members of the Kassite dynasty, we possibly may have to bring down the dates, previous to the Kassite dynasty, some decades. The only positive chronological data, so far known, by which we can be guided in an attempt to calculate the length of the apparent gap between the first and third dynasty, are the facts known in regard to the second dynasty itself. It has never been questioned that the...
الصفحة 29 - UrdEngur lugal-e sig-ta igi-nim-su glr si-ne-sd-a. The formulas for the first and second years of his reign we may perhaps, with more or less hesitation, restore in accordance with the formulas used by the following kings of the dynasty. The dates mu UrAb-ba pa-te-si and mu en dlnnanna Unu(g)ki-a dumu Ur-dEngur lugal-a mas-e bapa(d)-da, given by Thureau-Dangin3 as belonging to the reign of Ur-Engur, may be the date formulas of the patesi Ur-Abba of...