...of the cause of action." In Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 469, it is said : "The question always is, was there an unbroken connection...intervening between the wrong and the injury? * * * The inquiry must, therefore, always be whether there was any intermediate cause, disconnected from the...

...between the wrongful act and the injury— a continuous operation? Did the facts constitnte a continnous succession of events so linked together as to make...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury?" There may be a succession of intermediate causes, each produced by the oue preceding, and producing...

...responsible ones." In the case of Railway Co. v. Kellogg, 94 US 469, 24 L. Ed. 256, the court says: "The question always is: Was there an unbroken connection...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury? . . . It is generally held that in order to warrant a finding that negligence, or an act not amounting...

...Anderson v. Baltimore & Ohio Ry. Co., 74 W. Va. 21, 81 SE 581, 51 LRA (NS) 892, in which case it is said : "The question always is: Was there an unbroken connection...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury?" According to the evidence in this case there was an unbroken connection between the wrongful act and...

...movement, or as in the oft-cited case of the squib thrown in the market-place. 2 Blacks. Rep. 892. The question always is, was there an unbroken connection...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury ? It is admitted the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order to warrant...

...movement, or, as in the oft-cited case of the squib thrown in the market-place. (2 Blacks. Rep. 892.) The question always is, was there an unbroken connection...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury ? It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order...

...proximate cause of a disaster, though it may operate through successive instruments. 2 Blacks. Rep., 892. The question always is, was there an unbroken connection...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury? It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order to...

..."was then- an unbroken connection between the wrongful act and the injury, a continuous operation Î Did the facts constitute a continuous succession of...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury 1" thaw came, when she was cast against another boat, and lost. It was held that the storm, and not...

...v. Wilmington, etc., R. Co., 109 NC 430, 449, 14 SE 43, 47, 14 LRA 749. The Supreme Court declares : "The question always is, was there an unbroken connection...cause intervening between the wrong and the injury?" Railway Company v. Kellogg, 94 US 469, 475, 24 L. Ed. 256. And again : "The proximate cause is the...

...nhvays is. was there an unbroken connection between the wrongful act and the injury,— a continuons operation? Did the facts constitute a continuous succession...Intervening between the wrong and the injury?" The negligent omission of the valve did not necessarily set the other causes in operation. It was, in the...