THE JESUITS. [From the Second of the Satires upon the Jesuits. 1860.] These are the Janissaries of the cause, The life-guard of the Roman Sultan, chose Who, 'stead of lace and ribbons, doctrine cry; As the known factors here, the brethren, once And shall these great Apostles be contemned, And thus by scoffing heretics defamed? They, by whose means both Indies now enjoy The two choice blessing, lust and Popery? Which buried else in ignorance had been, It pitied holy Mother Church to see 2 So were you chosen the fittest to reclaim Yet these were in compassion sent to Hell, 1 Cardinal Bellarmin, the great Jesuit controversialist, opposed by James I. 2 The Spanish pieza de à ocho, a dollar, or eight silver reals. Compelled instead of fiends to worship you, If to destroy be Reformation thought, A plague as well might the good work have wrought. Each snivelling hero seas of blood can spill, When wrongs provoke, and honour bids him kill ;- But does it of true inbred cruelty; Your cool and sober murderer, who prays And stabs at the same time, who one hand has Cut-throats in godly pure sincerity, So they with lifted hands, and eyes devout, Said grace, and carved a slaughtered monarch out. One death alone quenched his revengeful mind, Their savage cruelty, the rest had gone; And forced the Godhead to create anew. THE DOMESTIC CHAPLAIN.' [From A Satire addressed to a Friend that is about to leave the University, and come abroad in the world.] 1 Some think themselves exalted to the sky, If they light in some noble family. 1 Loyola ceased to be a soldier after the siege of Pampeluna. Diet, a horse, and thirty pounds a year, Are things that in a youngster's sense sound great. Who, though in silken scarf and cassock dressed, When dinner calls, the implement must wait, And if the enjoyment of one day be stole, And they, though loose, still drag about their chain. A chaplainship served up, and seven years' thrall? The menial thing, perhaps, for a reward Is to some slender benefice preferred, With this proviso bound: that he must wed My lady's antiquated waiting-maid In dressing only skilled, and marmalade. 1 Basket for the scraps of dinner. JOHN DRYDEN. [BORN in 1631, at Aldwincle All Saints, in the valley of the Nen in Northamptonshire, of Puritan parentage; and educated at Westminster School and Trinity College, Cambridge. He appears to have become a Londoner about the middle of the year 1657. At the Restoration he changed into an ardent royalist; and towards the close of 1663 married the daughter of a royalist nobleman, the Earl of Berkshire. In 1670 he was appointed Historiographer-Royal and Poet-Laureate. After having hitherto been conspicuous as a dramatist and a panegyrical poet, he in 1681, by the publication of the First Part of Absalom and Achitophel, sprang into fame as a writer of satirical verse. In December 1683 he was appointed Collector of Customs in the port of London. His offices were renewed to him on the accession of King James II, but his pension of 100l. was not renewed till rather more than a year later. About the same time Dryden became a Roman Catholic; and in April 1687, he published The Hind and the Panther. Deprived of both offices and pension by the Revolution of 1688, he again for a time wrote for the stage, but after a few years finally abandoned dramatic composition for translation. Some of his greatest lyrics likewise belong to his later years. He died at his house in Gerard Street, Soho, May 1, 1700, and was buried with great pomp in Westminster Abbey.] Dryden has been called the greatest writer of a little age; but it may well be doubted whether he for one would have cared to accept either limb of the antithesis. None of his moral qualities better consorted with his magnificent genius than the real modesty which underlay his buoyant self-assertion. His attitude towards the great literary representative of an age earlier than that to which his own maturity belonged was from first to last one of reverent recognition; and though the lines written by Dryden under Milton's portrait have more sound than point, they should not be forgotten as testifying to the spirit which dictated them. Of Oldham, in both the species of verse to which he owed his reputation infinitely Dryden's inferior, the elder poet wrote that their souls were near allied, and cast in the same poetic mould. To Congreve, his junior by full forty years, he declared that he would gladly have resigned the laureateship, in which he had been supplanted by a Whig poetaster. On the other hand, whatever aspect the Restoration age, either in politics or in literature, may wear in our eyes, in its own it assumed any semblance rather than that of an age of decline. And indeed, to speak of its literature only, it must be admitted that there are not a few considerations to be urged against the acceptance of such a designation. It is common enough to find the literature of the Restoration age set down as essentially a foreign literature, reproduced and imitated. Yet a survey of Dryden's works alone, both dramatic and non-dramatic, should suffice to shake the foundations of any such criticism. The 'heroic plays a species in which Dryden had rivals but no equal-differed from the courtly romances of the Scudéry school as full-bodied Burgundy differs from diluted claret. The so-called Restoration comedy-of the later and more perfect growth of which Dryden's efforts were but the precursors-is both for better and for worse as genuinely national as it is unmistakeably real. It would of course be extremely absurd to deny the great influence in this period of French literature upon our own; but it was an influence of much greater importance for the future of our literature, both prose and verse, as to form than as to matter. Yet though the clearness as well as the pointedness of the Restoration style was partly due to French example, these qualities were something very different from the imported fashions of a season. Dryden may be charged with more than his usual audacity when, in a Prologue of 1672, he spoke of 'our wit' as far excelling 'foreign wit,' after, in an Epilogue of 1670, he had extolled his own times as not only wittier but 'more refined and free' in their use of the native tongue than any preceding age. Yet inasmuch as during two centuries English writers have on the whole followed Dryden and his contemporaries instead of reverting to their predecessors of the Elizabethan and earlier Stuart periods, it would savour of rashness contemptuously to dismiss the claims to literary honours of an age which formed for itself a style of so proved a merit. With the aid of this style it virtually called into life a new species of English poetry—that satirical poetry of which Dryden is not indeed the originator, but in which he was the first as he has in most respects remained the greatest master. Whatever view be taken of the general features of the age of which Dryden was the chief literary ornament-while Milton's muse, like the blind poet himself, dwelt apart—it is certain that |