nacle, seemingly unconscious of the offensiveness of their action. To thus leave a house of worship before the close of the services, is a breach of one of the most essential forms of good breeding, that should never be tolerated, much less indulged in. On this occasion, the speaker who arose to address the congregation notified all who wished to retire to do so, and then he asked that the doors be closed. This was done, and there was comparative quiet while he spoke. No sooner had he closed his remarks, however, than there was another rush for the doors, for it was forgotten, apparently, that singing and prayer are also parts of the service. Nor was this all the offense, for the behavior of a large number who were present at the meeting was not at all what deference to a house of worship, to say nothing of respect for the speaker, should and does demand. Such conduct is severely reprehensible, and should be stopped. Young men and women who are guilty of it should consider what a grave offense it is, and strive not to be guilty of it again. It is unworthy the children of the Saints, or of any person who has proper respect for himself.

The young people should learn to act properly in places of religious worship; they should be willing to set aside their natural inclinations for pleasure and license, and learn to control themselves, and act with propriety. It is an old and true saying that there is a time and a place for all things. To be able to conduct oneself in conformity with the demands of the place in which one finds himself, is a very useful acquirement, essential to the comfort and the pleasure of others and to our own true happiness. Upon this matter, every young person should thoughtfully consider, and then strive to improve.

Those who preside over religious gatherings should insist upon receiving from the audience and from each individual thereof, that regard and deference which are due to the places and to their positions. The boys and girls should learn that John or Thomas or William, however plain and familiar when among them as playmates, companions, or friends and neighbors, are entitled to special respect when presiding over meetings of worship. Neither should it be forgotten by them that the place itself is sacred, and that good breeding demands of them that they shall also pay to it the deference due. Their fellow-worshipers should also be consid

ered. The scripture passage: "For he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?" might be changed to read: "For he that regardeth not his brother in authority nor payeth deference to the house of worship, how can he love and revere the Lord?"

The teaching of deference for sacred places should be encouraged in our associations, as well as in other gatherings of the Saints. A vigorous discipline should be instituted to impress its importance.

The possession of the quality of deference marks a high type of manhood and womanhood, a lack of it is characteristic of the ill-bred and unrefined.

THE ROBERTS CASE.

The reader of the daily press who has kept informed upon the case of Utah's representative in Congress, Hon. B. H. Roberts, and followed the proceedings to prevent his being seated, must have noticed the unusual and even unwarranted steps in the action taken by Congress.

There is no irregularity in his certificate or in his election. He possesses all three of the qualifications of a representative, prescribed by the Constitution: he has attained the age of 25 years; he has been seven years a citizen of the United States; and is an inhabitant of the state in which he was chosen. And yet the House, when he presented himself to take the oath of office, excluded him, deciding by a large majority vote that he would not be permitted to take the oath of office. Why? Because of the presentation of large bundles of petitions principally written, obtained and presented through the labors of church ministers who are prejudiced enemies and radical opposers of The Church to which he happens to belong. These petitions charged him with living in polygamy; in other words, with violating a statute in Utah which defines his alleged offense as a misdemeanor. But there was no evidence except the unsupported allegations of the petitioners. There was no court record of such

alleged crime, although ample time and opportunity were given to establish this, if it existed, through the state courts of Utah which had jurisdiction in such cases. There was further, no law applicable to his case, either of the State of Utah or of the United States, which disqualified him.

Notwithstanding these facts, the House prevented him from being sworn, without evidence, cause or reason except the allegations of a multitude of irresponsible petitioners; and it undertook to establish his guilt while he was yet unsworn, hence not a member, by referring his case to a special House committee, which committee endeavored by the examination of witnesses to establish his guilt on a violation of a state statute with which neither the House nor its committee had anything to do.

The Constitution, among other provisions, gives Congress a right to be the judge of the elections of its own members, and to expel a member for just cause. Nowhere, however, is the right given to prevent a representative who has the qualifications provided in the Constitution, and who holds his proper state credentials, from being sworn, and from taking his seat. He must be a member before he can be treated to expulsion'for cause. It is true, the qualifications of persons claiming seats in the House may be called in question, and in such case the house may go behind the certificate of election, examine witnesses, and decide who has received a majority of legal votes, but until the matter is decided, the person holding the certificate of election is a member of Congress just as if there was no question about his election. But Representative Roberts, with all his qualifications, has been denied membership, and that too while he is being tried without warrant in law.

There is absolutely no justification for the House in the proceedings it has taken to prevent Mr. Roberts from becoming a member. Religious prejudice has completely upset the judgment of its members and has caused them to recklessly over-ride all law and precedent. Bigoted ministers have caused that supposedly great body to set an example of defiance to law and right that is liable to become a dangerous rock to the ship of liberty.

It has been maintained that the Edmunds law disqualifies Mr. Roberts and gives the House an excuse for its action. The people who have protested against his being sworn and taking his seat,

base their objections upon this law, and rely upon it for a justification and warrant for their course. It provides that no person who is a polygamist, or who cohabits with more than one wife shall be entitled "to hold any office or place of public trust, honor or emolument * * * * under the United States."

But all the disabilities which Mr. Roberts may once have had under this law were removed by the amnesties of two presidents, and the enabling act of Congress for the admission of Utah, which latter provides for just such cases by permitting all male citizens twenty-one years of age or over, who have been one year residents of the then territory, to take part in the formation of the state constitution, and to vote for its adoption.

But, again, if this were not enough, and the Edmunds law, as some have contended, should be applied to the District of Columbia where Congress has sole jurisdiction, and to the qualification of members of Congress, and Mr. Roberts thus by law be prevented from taking his seat, the question would naturally arise whether the office of Representative in Congress is an office under the United States. The New York Sun has called attention to and investigated this question, and has come to the conclusion, citing several precedent examples, that the "weight of legal authority is strongly in favor of the proposition that it is not," and "that the framers of the Constitution excluded senators and representatives from the category of persons holding office under the United States." And thus every vestige of authority by law upon which is based the protests against him, and their acceptance by Congress, are swept away, and the House is left without law or excuse for its action in refusing Mr. Roberts to be sworn, and denying him a seat. It has done him and the state which he represents a grave wrong in denying him rights to which he is clearly entitled, and by so doing has set an example that threatens the liberty of every state in the Union.

The Sun comes to the conclusion after a review of the case of Mr. Roberts that, "if the prosecutors of Mr. Roberts have any case against him which affords good ground for his expulsion from the House of Representatives, let them bring it forward after his admission and turn him out. The case for excluding him which they have thus far presented, is fatally defective, and it is no exaggeration to say that its success would be a menace to American liberty."

The minority Committee report which holds to the above view, will doubtless open the whole subject for debate in the House, when Utah's Representative will have an opportunity to continue the vigorous battle that he is waging single-handed for the right.

NOTES.

"Don't wait for great things; for while you wait, the door to little ones may close."

To think we are able is almost to be so; to determine upon attainment is frequently attainment itself. Thus earnest resolution has often seemed to have about it almost a savor of omnipotence.-Samuel Smiles.

It is related that Dwight L. Moody once offered to his Northfield pupils a prize of five hundred dollars for the best thought. This took the prize: "Men grumble because God puts thorns with roses; wouldn't it be better to thank God that he puts roses with thorns?".

"I attach great importance to reading good books. Whatever success I have attained I attribute to the literature that I have read. It opens a world of thought and reasoning, and uplifts one to higher ideals and nobler ends. One may be poor, but in spirit he feels himself a prince, and equal to any other man. Good reading stimulates action and thought. I am never more pleased than when I see a young man reading a good book. I consider it one of the best signs."-W. A. Nash, banker.

Who has not noticed the power of love in an awkward, crabbed, shiftless, lazy man? He becomes gentle, chaste in language, enthusiastic, energetic, Love brings out the poetry in him. It is only an idea, a sentiment, and yet what magic it has wrought. Nothing we can see has touched the man, yet he is entirely transformed! So a high ambition entirely transforms a human being, making him despise ease and sloth, welcome toil and hardship, and shaking even kingdoms to gratify his master passion. Mere ambition has impelled many a man to a life of eminence and usefulness; its higher manifestation, aspiration, has led him beyond the stars. If the aim be right, the life in its details cannot be far wrong. Your heart must inspire what your hands execute, or the work will be poorly done. The hand cannot reach higher than does the heart. Success.