Section, this writer-The changing water into wine-Healing the ..................... 288 V. Nothing in this Gospel that can be deemed a prophecy, but a few short sentences which seem to refer to futurity- CHẠP. VII.-Of the Epistles. 1. Reasons for extending this disquisition to several of the Epistles-Epistle to the Romans .................... 305 II. The Epistle to the Ephesians-And to the Colossians .... 312 III. The Epistle to the Philippians-To Titus—And to Phi lemon .... ...................... ............. 314 IV. The Epistle to the Hebrews---And the Epistle of James •. 321 V. The first Epistle of Peter-Second Epistle of Peter-And the Epistle of Jude ............ want of that internal testimony of the spirit of prophecy to the Corinthians, Galatians, Thessalonians, and Timothy 332 VII. Reasons for objecting to the Epistles to the seven Churches of Asia, introduced into the Book of the Apocalypse.... 336 CONCLUSION .... 340 ..... 329 PUBLISHED BY THE AUTHOR, And Sold by J. Johnson, 72, St. Paul's Church-yard ; W. Vidler, 187, High-Holborn, London; and J. WASHBOURN, Gloucester, 1. A Defence of the DISSONANCE of the Four EvanGELISTs, in reply to the Objections of Dr. Priestley and the Rev. Mr. Simpson; in a Letter to Dr. Priestley's Young Man, with a Postscript. Price 2s. 2. ARGUMENTs against and for the SABBATICAL OB SERVANCE of SUNDAY; together with a Letter to the Rev. Dr. Priestley. Price 2s. 6d. 3. Reflections upon the State of Religion in CHRIS TENDOM; containing a full and regular, though concise, Explanation of the Apocalypse, or Book of Reve lation. Price 2s. 6d. 4. Second Thoughts on the TRINITY, recommended to the Bishop of Gloucester. Price Is. 6d. THE DISSONANCE AND EVIDENCE OF THE EVANGELISTS EXAMINED. INTRODUCTION. SECTION 1. A FTER so many writers, some of them 11 of great erudition and distinguished abilities, in almost all ages of what is called the Christian Church, have undertaken to harmonize and shew the perfect agreement of the four generally received Evangelists, and to reconcile all the seeming differences in both the facts and order of their several narrations; it will undoubtedly appear the highest degree of presumptuous arrogance to attempt now at last to demonstrate, that so much learned and ingenious labour hath been bestowed in vain. Yet after all that hath been said and written upon the subject, those Evangelical histories contain such gross, irreconcileable contradice |