« السابقةمتابعة »
of the ancients. While an author is yet living, we estimate his powers by his worst performance; and, when he is dead, we rate them by his best.
To works, however, of which the excellence is not absolute and definite, but gradiial and comparative; to works-not raised upon principles demonstrative and scientifick, but appealing wholly to observātion and experiencë, no other tėśt can be applied than length of duration and continuance of esteem. What mankind have long possessed they have often examined and compared; and if they persist to value the possession, it is because frequent comparisons have confirmed opinion in its favour. As among the works of nature nó iñan can properly call a river deep, or a mountain highs without the knowledge of many mountains; and many rivers ; so; in the productions of genius, nothing can be styled excellent till it has been compared with other works of the saine kind. Demonstration immediately displays its power, and has nothing to hope or fear from the flux of years ; but works tentative and experimental must be estimated by their proportion to the general and collective ability of man, as it is discovered in a long succession of endeavours. Of the first building that was raised, it might be with certainty determined that it was round or square; but whether it was spacious or lofty must have been referred to time. The Pythagorean scale of numbers was at once discovered to be perfest: but the poems of Homer we yet know not to transcend the common limits of human intelligence but by remarking, that nation after nation, and cen.' Kij
tury tury after century, has been able to do little more than transpose his incidents, new-name his characters, and paraphrase his sentiments. by such characters as were never seen, conversing in a language which was never heard, upon topicks which will never arise in the commerce of mankind. But the dialogue of this author is often so evidently determined by the incident which produces it, and is pursued with so much ease and simplicity, that it seems scarcely to claim the merit of fiction, but to have been gleaned by diligent selection out of common conversation, and common occurrences. ·
The reverence due to writings that have long sub. sisted, arises, therefore, not from any credulous confidence in the superior wisdom of past ages, or gloomy persuasion of the degeneracy of mankind, but is the consequence of acknowledged and indubitable positions, that what has been longest known has been most considered, and what is most considered is best understood.
The poet, of whose works I have undertaken the revision, may now begin to assume the dignity of an ancient, and claim the privilege of established fame and prescriptive veneration. He has long outlived his century, the term commonly fixed as the test of literary merit. Whatever advantages he might once derive from personal allusions, local customs, or temporary opinions, have for many years been lost; and every topick of merriment, or motive of sorrow, which
he modes of artificial life afforded him, now only ob. scure the scenes which they once illuminated. The effects of favour and competition are at an end ; the tradition of his friendships and his enmities has pe. rished'; : his works support no opinion with arguments, nor supply any faction with invectives ; they can neither indulge vanity, nor gratify malignity; but are read without any other reason than the desire of pleasure, and are therefore praised only as pleasure is obtained : yet, thus unassisted by interest or passion,'
- they have past through variations of taste and change
of manners, and, as they devolved from one genera. tion to another, have received new honours at every transmission
But because human judgment, though it be gradually gaining upon certainty, never becomes infallible; and approbation, though long continued, may yet be only the approbation of prejudice or fashion ; it is proper to inquire, by what peculiarities of excellence Shakspere has gained and kept the favour of his countrymen. · Nothing can please many, and please long, but just representations of general nature. Particular manners can be known to few, and therefore few only can judge how nearly they are copied. The irregular combinations of fanciful invention may delight awhile, by that novelty of which the common satiety of life sends us all in quest ; but the pleasures of sudden wonder are soon exhausted; and the mind can only repose on the stability of truth.
Shakspere is, above all writers, at least above all modern writers, the poet of nature; the poet that holds up to his readers a faithful mirror of manners and of life. His characters are not modified by the customs of partiçular places, unpractised by the rest of the world; by the peculiarities of studies or professions, which can operate but upon small numbers ; or by the accidents of transient fashions or temporary opinions : they are the genuine progeny of common humanity, such as the world will always supply, and observation will always find. His persons act and Kiij
speak by the influence of those general passions and principles by which all minds are agitated, and the whole system of life is continued in motion. In the writings of other poets a character is too often an individual; in those of Siakspere' it is commonly a species,
It is from this wide extension of design thåt so' much instruction is derived. It is this which fills the plays of Shakspere with practical axioms and domestick wisdom. It was said of Euripides, that every verse was a precept; and it may be said of Shakspere, that from his works may be collected a system of civil and economical prudence, Yet his real power is not shewn in the splendour of particular passages, but by the progress of his fable, and the tenor of his dialogue ; and he that tries to recommnend him by select quotations, will succeed like the pedant in Hierocles, who, when he offered his house to sale, carried a brick in his pocket as a specimen.
It will not easily be imagined how much Shakspere excels in accommodating his sentiments to real life, but by comparing him with other autłors. It was observed of the ancient schools of declamation, that the more diligently they were frequented, the more was the student disqualified for the world, because he found notliing there which he should ever meet in any other place. The same remark may be applied to every stage but that of Shakspere. The theatre, when it is under any other direction, is peopled
Upon every other stage the universal agent is love, by whose power all good and evil is distributed, and every action quickened or retarded. To bring a lover, a lądy, and a rival into the fable; to entangle them in contradictory obligations, perpiex them with oppositions of interest, and harass them with violence of desires inconsistent with each other; to make them meet in rapture, and part in agony ; to fill their mouths with hyberbolical joy and outrageous sorrow; to distress them as nothing human ever was distressed; to deliver them as nothing human ever was delivered; is the business of a modern dramatist. For this, pro. bability is violated, life is misrepresented, and language is depraved. But love is only one of many passions; and as it has no greater influence upon the sum of life, it has little operation in the dramas of a poet, who caught his ideas from the living world, and exhibited only what he saw before him. He knew that any other passion, as it was regular or exorbitant, was a cause of happiness or calamity,
Characters, thus' ample and general, were not easily, discriminated and preserved ; yet perhaps no poet ever