صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني
[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

ROBISON, JOHN, was born in 1739, at Boghall in the county of Stirling. His father, who had been a merchant at Glasgow, but who then resided on his estate, intended that he should enter the clerical order, and accordingly he sent him, at eleven years of age, to the university of that city. Here the youth studied the classics under Dr. Moore, and moral philosophy under Dr. Adam Smith; and at the same time he received instructions in mathematics from Dr. Robert Simson. He took his degree of M.A. in 1756; but he declined the Church as a profession.

Being thus compelled to seek an occupation in some other line, he went to London in 1758, with a recommendation from Dr. Simson to Dr. Blair, a prebendary of Westminster, who was then desirous of obtaining some person to instruct the young Duke of York in navigation, and to accompany his royal highness in a voyage to sea, an intention being entertained that the prince should serve in the royal navy. The project was afterwards abandoned, but Mr. Robison consented to embark on board the Neptune with a son of Admiral Knowles, who had just then received his appointment as a midshipman. This ship was one of a fleet destined to co-operate with the land-forces under General Wolfe in the reduction of Quebec; and during the voyage Mr. Knowles being promoted to the rank of lieutenant on board the Royal William, Robison, who was then rated as a midshipman, accompanied him. In May 1759 the fleet arrived in the St. Lawrence, and Mr. Robison was employed in surveying the river and the neighbouring country; at the same time he had an opportunity of making observations concerning the effects produced by the aurora borealis on the magnetic needle. The success of the expedition is well known; and on the return of the Royal William to England, Mr. Robison accepted an invitation from Admiral Knowles to reside with him at his seat in the country.

script, of which two, 'De Culminatione Stellarum Fixarum,' and 'De
Ortu et Occasu Stellarum Fixarum,' are preserved in manuscript
(Digby, 143) in the Bodleian Library. According to Wood, Sir
Kenelm Digby also possessed three other tracts by Robyns, viz.: 1,
'Annotationes Astrologica,' lib. iii.; 2, 'Annotationes Edwardi VI.;'
3, 'Tractatus de Prognosticatione per Ecclipsin;' and Wood adds that
these were also in the Bodleian Library. We suspect Wood is here in
error; for in the sale catalogue of the library of George, Earl of Bristol,
sold by auction in April 1680, a copy of which is in the British Museum,
we find an account of several manuscripts said formerly to have be
longed to Sir Kenelm Digby, and among these (No. 49) is 'Johannis
Robyns Annotationes Astrologicæ.' We are inclined to think that
Wood may have taken the titles from the catalogue of Thomas Allen's
library, in the Ashmolean Museum, nearly the whole of which came
into the hands of Kenelm Digby, and that the two titles of 'Anno-
tationes' do in reality belong to the same book. We are not aware
that any copy of this work of Robyns's is now in existence, although
there are some extracts from it in manuscript (Bodl. 3467), and the
loss of it is perhaps not much to be regretted. Wood slightly refers
to a book by Robyns, under the title of De Portentosis Cometis,' but
he says that he had never seen a copy. Bale however mentions having
seen one in the Royal Library at Westminster, and this copy is now
in the British Museum. Sherburne, in the appendix to his Manilius,'
mentions another in the possession of Gale, and this is now in the
library of Trinity College,—O. i. 11. We find also that there is still
another copy in the Ashmolean Museum, manuscript, No. 186. The
preface to this latter work, which is partly plagiarised from Cicero, is
printed in Halliwell's 'Rara Mathematica,' pp. 48-54.
*ROBINSON, REV. EDWARD, D.D., was born at Southington,
Connecticut, U. S., in 1794. He studied at Hamilton College at
Clinton in New York, where he graduated in 1816, and subsequently
became teacher of Greek and mathematics. He resigned this office in
1818, and in 1821 entered the theological seminary at Andover in
Massachusetts, in which he was in a short time appointed assistant
instructor in the department of sacred literature. In 1826 he came
to Europe, and studied the oriental languages at Paris and at Halle in
Prussia. He then, after a careful course of preliminary study, along
with Mr. Eli Smith spent the whole of 1838 in the Holy Land; and
the result of their inquiries was given to the world in 1841 in 'Biblical
Researches in Palestine, Mount Sinai, and Arabia Petræa;' a work
which has done more than any other to fix the sites of places and
events recorded in Scripture, and in dissipating the legends which had
been erroneously associated with them; and though some of Dr.
Robinson's positions have been contested, the learned world has
accepted his work as the most reliable that has been yet produced, and
for it the Royal Geographical Journal of London bestowed on him
their gold medal. In order to decide the controverted points which
had arisen as to some of the matters in his former book, Dr.
Robinson returned to Palestine in 1851, and has since published
"The Holy Land,' a work which well sustains his previous repu-
tation. On his return to his native country, after the publication of
his first work, he was appointed assistant professor and librarian in the
theological seminary at Andover, whence he removed to be professor
of Biblical literature in the Union Theological Seminary at New York,
an office which he yet holds. Besides the works above-mentioned Dr.
Robinson has written on various geographical and philological subjects,
chiefly in relation to sacred literature. Of these the principal are a
translation of the Hebrew Lexicon' of Gesenius (1836, fifth edition
1855); a translation of Buttmann's 'Greek Lexicon,' 1845, new and
enlarged edition 1851; Commentary on the Apocalypse,' 1845;
Critical History and Defence of the Old Testament Canon; Har
mony of the Four Gospels in English;' 'Harmony of the Four Gospels
in Greek;' 'Dictionary of the Holy Bible;' and 'Historical View of
the Languages and Literature of the Slavic Nations,' by Talvj (pseudo-a
nym), 1850. He also for a time edited and has largely contributed
to the Bibliotheca Sacra,' 1843, &c.

* ROBINSON, JOHN HENRY, R.A., line engraver, was born about 1796 at Bolton, Lancashire. A pupil of James Heath, Mr. Robinson adopted somewhat of that engraver's manner, but he has in his later plates made good his claim to originality as well as refine ment of style. Among the best known of his works are the admirable head of Sir Walter Scott from the fire picture by Sir Thomas Lawrence; Wilkie's Napoleon and Pope Pius VII.;' Landseer's Little Red Riding-Hood,' 'Twelfth Night,' and 'The Mantilla;' Mulready's 'Wolf and Lamb;' and Leslie's 'Mother and Child,' of its kind one of the richest in tone and colour and most delicate in expression of recent English engravings. In our notice of Mr. Doo [Doo, G. T., col. 632] by a slip of the pen we ascribed to that gentleman the fine engraving of the Queen from the portrait by Mr. Part ridge: we should have said that he executed the portrait of Prince Albert by Partridge; the companion portrait of the Queen is from the burin of Mr. Robinson, and it is as admirable for high finish and refinement of execution, as that of the Prince is for breadth and vigour; they are unquestionably the finest pair of engravings which have yet been executed of the Queen and her consort. Mr. Robinson has also executed some prints from the old masters, including the well-known Flower Girl,' by Murillo. He was elected Associate engraver in 1856, and Academician in 1867.

In 1762, Lieutenant Knowles being appointed to the command of a sloop of war, Robison accompanied him in a voyage to Spain and Portugal; but after being absent six months he returned to England, and quitted entirely the naval service. His friend and patron the admiral however recommended him to Lord Anson as a person qualified to take charge of Harrison's timekeeper, which, after the labour of thirty-five years, was considered fit to be used for the important purpose of determining the longitude of a ship at sea, and which it was proposed by the Board of Longitude to try during a voyage to the West Indies. In consequence of this recommendation, Mr. Robison, accompanied by a son of Mr. Harrison, sailed to Jamaica, where, on January 26, 1763, the chronometer (whose rate had been determined at Portsmouth, November 6, 1762) was found, after allowing for that rate, to indicate a time less by 5" only than that which resulted from the known difference between the longitudes of the two places; and on his return to England, 2nd of April 1763, that is, after an absence of 147 days, the whole error was found to be but 1′ 54′′.

Mr. Robison, being disappointed in his expectations of promotion from the Admiralty, set out for Glasgow in order to resume his studies. Here, enjoying the friendship of Dr. Black and Mr. Watt, the former of whom was on the point of developing his theory of latent heat, and the latter of bringing forward his great improvements on the steam-engine, he felt himself irresistibly impelled towards the pursuit of the physical sciences. On the removal of Dr. Black to Edinburgh, Mr. Robison was appointed to succeed him, and for four years he gave lectures on natural philosophy at Glasgow; but at the end of that time he accepted (1770) the appointment of secretary to Admiral Sir Charles Knowles, who had been invited by the Empress of Russia to superintend the improvements which that sovereign contemplated making in her navy. Two years after his arrival at St. Petersburg Sir Charles became president of the Board of Admiralty, and Robison was made inspector of the corps of maritime cadets at Cronstadt, with liberal salary and the rank of lieutenant-colonel in the Russian service. He gave no instructions, but his duty was to receive the reports of the masters, and to class the cadets in the order of their merits; this he performed for four years, but finding Cronstadt a dreary place of residence during the winter, he accepted the professorship of natural philosophy at Edinburgh, which had become vacant by the death of Dr. Russel. He arrived in that city in June 1774, bringing with him two or three of the Russian cadets, whose education he had undertaken to superintend; and in the same year he gave a series of lectures on mechanics, optics, electricity, astronomy, &c. This course he continued to deliver annually during the rest of his life, except when ill health obliged him to appoint a substitute for the purpose, improving each subject from time to time by the introduction of every important discovery which it received from the researches of his contemporaries. The lectures aro said to have been distinguished by accuracy of definition and clearness as well as brevity of demonstration; and the experiments by which they were illustrated, to have been performed with neatness and precision. But it has been objected to them that they were delivered with a rapidity of utterance which made it difficult for the students to follow him; that he supposed his pupils to possess a higher degree of preparatory information than they had in general attained, even when they had gone through the university course of study, and that the experiments were too few in number to serve the purpose intended by them.

On settling in Edinburgh, Mr. Robison became a member of the

[blocks in formation]

Philosophical Society of that city. In 1785 he was attacked by a dis-
order which was attended with pain and depression of spirits, but he
was only occasionally prevented from performing his duties and
following his literary avocations. In 1798 he was made Doctor in
Laws by the University of New Jersey, and in the following year by
that of Glasgow; and in 1800 he was elected a foreign member of the
Academy of Sciences at St. Petersburg. In 1785 he wrote a paper,
which was published in the first volume of the 'Philosophical Trans-
actions of Edinburgh,' on the determination, from his own observa-
tions, of the orbit and motion of the Georgium Sidus; and he
afterwards wrote one which appeared in the second volume of the
same work, on the motion of light as affected by reflecting and
refracting substances which are themselves in motion. But his most
important works are the numerous articles which, in 1793 and the
following years, he contributed to the third edition of the Encyclo.
pædia Britannica and its Supplement;' a series of treatises which
may be considered as forming a complete body of physical science for
that time.
Mr. Robison was prevailed upon to superintend the publication of
Dr. Black's lectures on chemistry, and they came out in 1803; but that
science had undergone so great a change since the death of the learned
lecturer, that the work excited little interest. In the following year
he published a portion, containing dynamics and astronomy, of a book
entitled 'Elements of Mechanical Philosophy; but the substance of
it, together with that of some MSS. which had been intended by the
author to form part of the second volume, and also the principal
articles which had been written for the Encyclopædia Britannica,'
were collected by Dr., now Sir David, Brewster, under the title of 'A
System of Mechanical Philosophy,' and published in 1822, with notes,
in 4 vols. 8vo.
While Mr. Robison was on his journey to Russia in 1770, he was
hospitably entertained by the Bishop of Liège, who, with all his
chapter, constituted a lodge of freemasons; and into this society our
traveller was induced to enter. It is unknown from what source he
obtained his information respecting its proceedings, but twenty-nine
years afterwards he published a remarkable work containing A History
of the German Illuminati,' whom he describes as the agents in a plot
formed by the freemasons to overturn all the religions and govern-
ments of Europe. The work met with little attention, and Robison
was charged with a degree of credulity scarcely to be expected in a
person so well acquainted with the laws of philosophical evidence.
Having taken a slight cold, and suffered an illness of only two days'
duration, Mr. Robison died on the 30th of January 1805, in the sixty-
sixth year of his age, leaving a widow and four children. He is stated to
have been a person of prepossessing countenance, a good linguist, a
draughtsman, and an accomplished musician; and it is added that his
conversation was both energetic and interesting.

ROBORTELLO, FRANCIS, was born of a noble family, Sep. tember 9th, 1516. He was educated at Bologna under the celebrated Romulo Amasco, and he began about 1538 to teach the belles lettres at Lucca. Five years afterwards he went to Pisa, where he lived during the next five years, and laid the foundation of his fame, which was soon spread over the whole of Italy. In 1549 the senate of Venice elected him successor to Battista Egnazio, professor of rhetoric there, whose advanced age obliged him to retire from public duties. In 1552 Robortello was promoted to the chair of Greek and Latin literature in the University of Padua, in the place of Lazaro Buonamici, who died in that year. Thence he removed in 1557 to Bologna, in order to undertake a similar office in that city. Having been appointed to pronounce here the funeral oration in honour of the Emperor Charles V., who died in 1558, he is said to have forgotten the exordium, and to have been incapable of proceeding, which brought him into some disrepute. About this time he had violent disputes with Sigonius, in which Robortello appears to have been the aggressor, and which did not terminate till the senate of Venice employed their authority in imposing silence upon both. Robortello died at Padua, March 18, 1567, in the fifty-first year of his age, so poor that he did not leave enough to defray the expenses of his funeral, which however was celebrated by the university in a style of great magnificence.

Robortello seems to have been naturally pugnacious, and he was continually involving himself in disputes with men superior to himself. He could not refrain from attacking such writers as Erasmus, Paulo Manuzio, Muretus, and Henry Stephens. He was however a man of considerable talent and learning, and he published several books of great utility. The following are his principal works:-1, 'Variorum Locorum Annotationes tam in Græcis quam in Latinis Auctoribus,' 8vo, Venice, 1543; 2, 'De Historicâ Facultate,' &c., 8vo, Florence, 1548, being several treatises on Greek and Roman literature, all of which are inserted by Gruter in his "Thesaurus Criticus;' 3, 'De Convenientiâ Supputationis Livianæ Annorum cum Marmoribus Romanis quæ in Capitolio sunt; De Arte sive Ratione corrigendi Veteres Auctores Disputatio,' folio, Padua, 1557; 4, De Vitâ et Victu Populi Romani sub Imperatoribus Cæs. Augustis, folio, Bologna, 1559. Besides these he published editions of Aristotle's Poetics,' the Tragedies' of Eschylus, the 'Tactics' of Ælian, and Longinus 'On the Sublime.'

[blocks in formation]

noble family of France, was born in 1613. He appeared early at the court of Louis XIII., and showed some talents and ambition, but was kept out of employment and favour by the jealousy of Cardinal Richelieu. In the early part of the subsequent reign of Louis XIV. he figured in the civil war of La Fronde. He attached himself to the party of the Duchess of Longueville, whose avowed admirer he was, and he was severely wounded at the siege of Bordeaux, and in the battle of St. Antoine at Paris. After Louis XIV. had firmly established the monarchical authority, La Rochefoucauld withdrew to private life. In this second part of his career he exhibited private virtues which atoned for the folly and violence of his younger years. He was intimate with Madame de la Fayette, and with Madame de Sévigné, who speaks of him in her correspondence in terms of real esteem. He died in 1680, with calm and Christian-like resignation. The Cardinal de Retz, his contemporary and fellow-partisan, in his 'Mémoires,' says of him, that he was always irresolute in his temper; a good soldier, with no military talent; a bad courtier, though ambitious of figuring and meddling in intrigue; but at the same time he praises "his natural good sense, the ease and mildness of his manners," and says that "he was a very upright man in private life." La Rochefoucauld left several works, the principal of which are-'Mémoires de la Régence d'Anne d'Autriche;' and his 'Maximes,' or 'Pensées,' for which he is best known as an author. This book has made much noise in the world; it has been abused, criticised, controverted, and yet no one can deny that there is a great deal of truth in it, though it generalises too much. La Rochefoucauld attributes all the actions of men, good or bad, to the moving-spring of self-interest. Friendship is an exchange of good offices, generosity is the means of gaining good opinion, justice itself is derived from the fear of suffering from the oppression of others. This may be all true, but still there are actions in which men can have no self-interest in view, in which they act from enthusiasm, or a strong sense of duty, or from benevolence, or some motive other than selfinterest; such are, for instance, the self-devotedness of the patriot, the perseverance of the upright man through good and evil report, the sacrifice made by pure love, and, above all, the calm resignation of the Christian martyr. These and other similar instances La Rochefoucauld has not taken into account, because probably he had seen no specimen of them. La Rochefoucauld has accounted for most actions of a great proportion of mankind, perhaps by far the greater, and for so doing he has been abused, because, as a French lady observed, he has told everybody's secret. He has placed himself, with regard to private morality, in the same predicament as Machiavelli with regard to political morality. [MACHIAVELLL] J. J. Rousseau, who was certainly not free from selfishness, has abused La Rochefoucauld's 'Maximes; and yet in his Emile' he observes that "selfishness is the main-spring of all our actions," and that "authors, while they are for ever talking of truth, which they care little about, think chiefly of their own interest, of which they do not talk." La Fontaine, in his fable (b. i., 11) L'Homme et son Image,' has made an ingenious defence of La Rochefoucauld's book.

La Rochefoucauld's 'Maximes' have gone through many editions. The Euvres de La Rochefoucauld,' 1818, contain, besides his already published works, several inedited letters and a biographical notice. Several other individuals of the same family have acquired an historical name, among others, LOUIS ALEXANDRE DE LA ROCHEFoucauld, peer of France, who embraced the popular part at the beginning of the great French revolution, and displayed considerable violence in his sentiments, notwithstanding which, after the 10th of August, he was massacred by the Jacobins as an aristocrat.

ROCHESTER, LORD. [WILMOT.]

ROCKINGHAM, CHARLES WATSON WENTWORTH, MARQUIS OF, was the only son of the first Marquis of Rockingham, and was born on the 13th of May 1730, two years after the title of Baron of Malton had been conferred upon his father, who, in 1734, was advanced to the dignity of Earl of Malton, and, having succeeded to his cousin in the barony of Rockingham in 1746, was created Marquis of Rockingham the same year. The Watsons, barons, and for some time earls of Rockingham, had originally acquired importance by the marriage of one of them with the sister of the great Earl of Strafford, whose vast estates they in this way came to inherit.

In September 1750, while his father was still alive, the subject of the present article was created Earl of Malton in the Irish peerage; but before the end of the year his father's death left him in possession of the marquisate. Young as he was when he thus entered the House of Lords, he did not wait long before beginning to take a share in debate. Horace Walpole, in his 'Memoirs of the Last Ten Years of the Reign of George II.,' notices one or two of his earliest appearances in not very complimentary terms. When what was called the Scotch Bill (for planting colonies of foreign Protestants on the forfeited estates in Scotland) was under discussion in March 1752, he says, "The young Marquess of Rockingham entered into a debate so much above his force, and partly applied the trite old apologue of Menenius Agrippa, and the sillier old story of the fellow of college, who asked why we should do anything for posterity, who had never done anything for us!" Again, in his account of the debates in the following February, about the charge of Jacobitism brought against the solicitorgeneral Murray (Lord Mansfield) and other persons connected with ROCHEFOUCAULD, FRANÇOIS, DUC DE LA, of a distinguished the court, he notes, in the same sarcastic style :-"Lord Northum

ROBUSTI, JACOPO. [TINTORETTO.]

[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

berland, perceiving it was a day for great men to stand forth, thought it a good opportunity to announce his own dignity; but he said little to the purpose. Still less was said by the young Marquess of Rockingham, though he had prepared a long quotation from Tacitus about informers, and opened with it." But although never rated high as a man of talent, the mere wealth and independent position of the marquis necessarily secured him great influence, which was much strengthened by his upright and honourable character in private life, as well as by the moderation and consistency of his political conduct, although that was no doubt partly owing to the very narrowness of his understanding, which prevented him from ever looking beyond the particular set of notions he had originally taken up, or the particular people from whom he had received them. He had been educated in the principles of what was then considered constitutional Whiggism, and he evidently to the end of his life never entertained a doubt about the truth of his political opinions. In February 1760 he was made a Knight of the Garter. His political career from this date forms part of the history of the next reigu, and of the several persons of much greater mark than himself with whom he was brought into association or collision in the fluctuating contest of parties. [GEORGE III.; BURKE; PITT.] He was first lord of the treasury and prime minister from the 10th of July 1765 to the 12th of July 1766, and was again placed at the head of affairs with the same office on the resignation of Lord North, in March 1782, but died the 1st of July of that year. The Marquis of Rockingham married, in 1752, the daughter of Thomas Bright, Esq., of Badsworth, but had no children. His eldest sister was married in 1744 to the first Earl Fitzwilliam, whose son, having succeeded to the family estate on the death of the marquis, took the surname of Wentworth in 1807. RODERIC, the thirty-fourth and last of the Visigothic line of kings who filled the throne of Spain from 411 to 711. The circumstances which attended the elevation and fall of this prince are as doubtful as most events of that dark period. He appears to have been the son of Theodofred, duke of Cordova, and the grandson of Chindaswind. Having been entrusted by Witiza with the command of the army, Roderic revolted against his sovereign in 708, deprived him of the crown, and banished him to Toledo. For some time after his usurpation, Roderic had to contend against the sons and partisans of the dethroned monarch, who had taken refuge in the northern provinces of Spain. At last the sons of Witiza, perceiving their inability to cope with the forces of the usurper, crossed over to Africa, where they were kindly received by Ilyan (the Count Don Julian of Spanish chronicle), lord of Ceuta and Tangiers, and a friend of Witiza, who offered, if assisted by the Arabs, whose tributary he was, to restore the princes to the dominions of their father. Having communicated his project to Músa Ibn-Nosseyr, then governor of Africa for the Kalifs of Damascus [MUSA IBN-NOSSEYR], that general, who had long wished to carry his arms into Spain, gladly embraced the opportunity offered to him, and promised his powerful assistance. By his orders Tarif Abú Zorah, with four hundred Berbers, landed at Tartessus (siuce called Tarifa, in commemoration of this event), and after ravaging the adjoining country, returned to Africa laden with plunder and captives. This happened in Ramadhan, A.H. 91 (Oct. A.D. 710). The success of the enterprise filled the Arabian Amir with joy, and a second and more formidable expedition was, the ensuing year, directed against the shores of Spain, on Thursday the eighth of Rejeb, A.H. 92, answering to 30th April, 711. Tarik Ibn Zeyyád, a freed man of Músa Ibn Nosseyr, landed with eight thousand men at the foot of the rock of Calpe, to which he gave his own name, Jebal Tárik' (the mountain of Tárik), since corrupted into Gibraltar. Soon after their landing, Tárik and his followers were attacked by Theodomir, the governor of Andalucia. The Goths however were unable to force the positions taken up by Túrik, who, seeing his number daily increase by fresh reinforcements from Africa, descended into the plain, and advanced without opposition as far as Medina Sidonia. He was there met by Roderic, who, at the head of numerous but ill-disciplined forces, hastened to repel the invasion. After some sharp skirmishing, which lasted for six consecutive days, the two armies came to a general engagement on the 5th of Shawwal, A.H. 92 (26th July, 711). According to Ar-rází and other historians, this memorable battle, which decided the fate of the Gothic monarchy, was fought on the banks of the river Barbate, not on those of the Guadalete, as the generality of the Christian historians have erroneously asserted. It was at first hardly contested on both sides, until the defection of Oppas and other partisans of Witiza, to whom Roderic had imprudently entrusted the command of the right wing of his army, gave the victory to the Arabs. The rout then became general, and the flower of Gothic chivalry fell by the word of the Arabs, Roderic himself being in the number of the slain. This last fact has been brought into question by the generality of the Spanish historians, from Rodericus Toletanus down to Masdeu, on the ground that Sebastianus Salmanticensis, a monk and chronicler of the 10th century (in Flores, Esp. Sag.,' vol. xiii.), speaks of a tomb being discovered in his time, at Viséo in Portugal, bearing this inscription, Hic requiescit Rodericus ultimus Rex Gothorum;' from which they conclude that Roderic escaped the field of battle, and retired into Portugal, where he passed the remainder of his days in penance and prayer. The statement however is entitled to little credit for not only have we the testimony to the contrary of the

[blocks in formation]

Arabian writers, who universally agree that Roderic perished in the action, though they are divided as to the manner of his death, some asserting that he was slain by Tárik, and others that he was drowned in attempting to cross the river; but the assertion is further corroborated by Isidorus Pacensis, and the anonymous continuator of the 'Chronicon Biclarense'-two contemporary Christian writers, who positively declare that Roderic died in the action. Roderic's reign bad lasted nearly three years. There is a fabulous chronicle of this king, or rather a romance of chivalry, in which the popular traditions current among Moors and Christians respecting the invasion and conquest of Spain, as well as many ridiculous fables like that of Florinda, and the enchanted Tower of Toledo, have been embodied by an anonymous writer of the 14th century. It was printed for the first time at Toledo, 1549, and has since gone through several editions. Another fabulous history of Roderic and the events in which he was engaged, was written towards the middle of the 16th century, by a converted Moor of the name of Luna (Granada, 1592, 4to.). These, and other books of the same stamp, have furnished ample materials for some admirable works in recent English literature, by Scott, Southey, and Irving.

(Al-makkari's History of the Mohammedan Dynasties in Spain, vol. i, chaps. 1 and 2.)

RODNEY, ADMIRAL, LORD. GEORGE BRYDGES RODNEY was born at Walton-upon-Thames, in the county of Surrey, February 19, 1718. He was taken from Harrow School, and sent to sea at twelve years of age. In 1739 he was made a lieutenant; in 1742, a captain; and in 1748 he was sent out as governor and commander-in-chief on the Newfoundland station, with the rank of commodore. In October, 1752, Rodney returned to England, and was elected member of parliament for the borough of Saltash. He was appointed successively to the Fougueux, 61 guns; the Prince George, 90 guns; and the Dublin, 74. After twenty-eight years of active service, he was raised to the rank of rear admiral, May 19, 1759.

In 1761 Admiral Rodney was appointed commander-in-chief at Barbadoes and the Leeward Islands. Having captured the islands of Martinique, Santa Lucia, and Granada, he was recalled on the conclusion of peace in 1763. Soon after his return he was created a baronet, and by successive steps reached the rank of vice-admiral of the red. He was also appointed governor of Greenwich Hospital; but resigned this office on being sent out, in 1771, as commander-in-chief on the Jamaica station. In 1774 he was recalled.

Under the pressure of pecuniary difficulties, Sir George Rodney now retired to Paris, where he remained till May, 1778, when he was promoted to the rank of admiral of the white, and in the autumn of 1779 was again appointed commander-in-chief on the Barbadoes station, for which he sailed December 29, 1779. His fleet consisted of 22 sail of the line and 8 frigates. France and Spain were at this time united against England. Before he had been ten days at sea he had captured seven Spanish ships of war, and on the 16th of January, 1780, fell in with a Spanish fleet, under Admiral Langara, near Cape St. Vincent, consisting of 11 ships of the line, and 2 frigates. Of these five were taken and two destroyed; but the action being in the night, and the weather tempestuous, the rest escaped.

On the 17th of April 1780, Rodney came in sight of the French fleet, under the Comte de Guiche, near Martinique. Rodney intended to attack the enemy, which was a little superior, with his fleet in close order; but the greater part of his captains disobeyed, and kept at a cautious distance. Only five or six ships supported him, while in his own, the Sandwich, he engaged a 74 and two 80-gun ships for an hour and a half, and compelled them to bear away, and broke through the enemy's line. In his despatches Rodney censured the conduct of his captains, but the Admiralty suppressed the passage, and only one of them was brought to trial, who was dismissed from the service. The admiral was rewarded with the thanks of the House of Commons, and a pension of 2000l. a-year, to be continued after his death to his family in specified portions for their respective lives. In 1780 he was chosen, free of expense, to represent the city of Westminster, and was also made a Knight of the Bath. Soon afterwards war was declared against the states of Holland, and instructions were sent to Rodney to attack their possessions in the West Indies. The Dutch island of St. Eustatius surrendered, without a shot having been fired, February 3, 1781; and in the course of the spring, the Dutch colonies of Demerara, Essequibo, and Berbice were taken. Rodney, having returned to Europe in the autumn of 1781 for the recovery of his health, was received with universal enthusiasm, was created vice-admiral of England, in the place of Admiral Hawke deceased, and was appointed to the command of the whole of the West Indies. Both the French and Spanish fleets were at this time in the West Indies, and it was intended to form a junction and attack Jamaica and the other British possessions. The French fleet was commanded by the Comte de Grasse, and consisted of thirtythree or thirty-four sail of the line, besides frigates. Intelligence having been brought to Rodney, on the 8th of April 1782, of their having sailed from Fort Royal Bay, Martinique, he immediately followed them. A partial action took place on the 9th, when two of the French ships of the line were disabled, and a third was rendered useless by an accident in the night of the 11th, thus reducing the French fleet to thirty or thirty-one ships of the line. The Eritish

[blocks in formation]

fleet was rather more in number, but much less in weight of metal.
The general action commenced on the 12th of April 1782, at seven
o'clock in the morning, and lasted till half-past six in the evening.
Rodney, in the Formidable, broke through the French line, and
engaged the Ville-de-Paris, De Grasse's flag-ship, and compelled her
to strike. The result was, that seven ships of the line and two
frigates were taken by the British.
About this time the Whigs had come into office, and Rodney having
been always opposed to them, an officer was appointed to succeed him,
who had only just sailed when the news of this great victory reached
England, and the Admiralty immediately sent an express to overtake
and bring back the officer, but it was too late. Rodney reached
England, September 21, 1782. He was raised to the peerage with
the title of Baron Rodney, and received an additional pension of 20007.
a-year. He lived chiefly in the country, till May 24, 1792, when he
died, in his seventy-fifth year. He was twice married, and left a
numerous family. A monument was erected to his memory in
St. Paul's Cathedral, London, at the national expense. His portrait
by Reynolds was in the royal collection at St. James's Palace, but has
since been sent to Greenwich Hospital.

(Mundy, Life and Correspondence of Lord Rodney, London.) RODRIGUEZ, VENTURA, the most eminent Spanish architect of the eighteenth century, was born at Cienpozuelos, July 14, 1717, and commenced his first studies in his profession under Esteban Marchand, who was then employed on the works carrying on at Aranjuez. After the death of Marchand, in 1733, he still continued at Aranjuez, until Juvara engaged him as his assistant in making drawings for the design of the new palace at Madrid; and after the death of Juvara, he was similarly engaged by his successor Sachetti, with whom he was subsequently associated in the execution of that vast pile, as aparejador, or principal clerk of the works, 1741. In 1747 he was made honorary member of the Academy of St. Luke at Rome; and on that of St. Fernando being established at Madrid, in 1752, he was appointed chief director or professor of architecture in it, an office for which he was peculiarly fitted, not only by his talents, but by his zeal for his art, and his solicitude for the improvement of the pupils. Commissions poured in upon him from every quarter; for there was scarcely a work of any importance throughout the country on which he was not either engaged or consulted. He was employed on various cathedrals, ❘ churches, colleges, hospitals, and other structures at Zaragoza, Malaga, Toledo, Granada, Valladolid, and numerous other places; and a mere list of the works designed or executed by him would be one of considerable extent. We can here merely point out, as being among the more remarkable for their design, the sanctuary at Cobadonga, the church of San Felipe Neri at Malaga, that of the hospital at Oviedo, and the palace of the Duque de Liria at Madrid.

These multiplied engagements, and the frequent journeys which they occasioned him, prevented his visiting Italy; but he collected all works of engravings relative both to its ancient and modern buildings. He also carefully studied the various monuments of Roman, Moorish, and Gothic architecture in his own country. He died at Madrid in 1785, in his sixty-eighth year, and was buried in the church of San Marcos, the only one in that capital erected by himself. Rodriguez has been honoured with an Elogio by the celebrated Jovellanos, to which we must refer those who wish for a more detailed notice of his character and works. He is also repeatedly mentioned with high commendation by Ponz, in his Viage de España;' and he doubtless deserves the title he received from his contemporaries, of the Restorer of Architecture in Spain.

ROEBUCK, JOHN, M.D., the son of a Sheffield manufacturer, was born in 1718. He received a liberal education at Northampton under Dr. Doddridge, and subsequently in the University of Leyden, and settled in Birmingham as a physician. Pursuing an early taste for chemistry, he introduced some improvements in the processes of refining gold and silver, and established, in connection with Mr. Samuel Garbet, an extensive refinery and chemical manufactory at Birmingham. He there effected such improvements in the manufacture of sulphuric acid (formerly called vitriolic acid, or oil of vitriol), by the use of leaden instead of glass vessels, and by other modifications of the process, as enabled him to reduce its price from sixteenpence to four-pence per lb., and thus to render it available for many new and important purposes in connection with manufactures; and, in conjunction with Mr. Garbet, he established, in 1749, vitriol-works at Preston-pans for the purpose of bringing these improvements into practice, thereby rendering a great service to our rising manufactures, and securing to himself and his partner a handsome return. He is said to have tried bleaching with sulphuric acid, but the subsequent introduction of this valuable process does not appear to be traceable to his experiments. Abandoning his medical practice, Roebuck henceforward resided chiefly in Scotland, where he perfected improved methods of smelting and manufacturing iron with pit-coal instead of charcoal, and founded the great iron-works at Carron, for which he chiefly designed the furnaces and machinery, calling in the aid of Smeaton, and subsequently of Watt. The first furnace at this great establishment, the formation of which constitutes an era in the history of British manufactures, was blown on the 1st of January 1760. Unfortunately for himself, Roebuck subsequently became the lessee of extensive coal and salt-works at Borrowstowness, belonging to the

BIOG. DIV. VOL, V.

[blocks in formation]

Duke of Hamilton. For the carrying on of these works, on which he employed nearly a thousand persons, he was obliged to withdraw his capital successively from his other undertakings, and ho nevertheless became so involved as to derive only a bare subsistence from the collieries, although his improved modes of working were highly beneficial to the country. While engaged in this speculation he became connected, as stated under JAMES WATT, with some of the early experiments of the author of the modern steam-engine, in the first patent for which he had a share. He died on the 17th of July 1794. In a copious memoir in the fourth volume of the Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh,' of which he was a Fellow, he is stated to have been the author of a few papers read before that and the Royal Society of London, and to have published two political pamphlets. *ROEBUCK, JOHN ARTHUR, M.P., was born at Madras in 1801. He was the son of E. Roebuck, Esq., of that place, who was the son of the eminent Dr. Roebuck of Birmingham, the subject of the preceding article. Mr. Roebuck can also trace his descent from the poet Tickell. When very young Mr. Roebuck went to Canada, whence he came over in 1824 to become an English barrister. He was called to the bar at the Inner Temple in 1831, and went on the Northern circuit. He is now a Queen's Counsel and a bencher of the Inner Temple. In 1832 he was returned as member for Bath to the first Reformed House of Commons; and since that time he has been known as one of the 'advanced liberals' of that House, and as one of the most resolute and effective advocater of the various measures which from time to time have formed or still form the policy of the party so designated. He sat for Bath till 1837, having in the meantime (1834) married a daughter of the Rev. Thomas Falconer of Bath, who is known as an author, and as having been Bampton lecturer at Oxford. During this early part of his parliamentary career, Mr. Roebuck made his reputation as one of the chiefs of what has been called the 'school of philosophical radicalism,' in which capacity he was also a contributor to the 'Westminster Review' in its early days. He was agent in England for the House of Assembly of Lower Canada in the actual time of the Canadian rebellion, and zealously defended the interests of the colony in her dispute with the executive. At this time also he won that character for independence and incorruptibility, touched with something of asperity, which he has ever since retained. As a Radical he was very severe on the Whigs, both in parliament and out of it; and he had a quarrel which led to a duel with Mr. Black, editor of the Morning Chronicle,' the Whig journal. His hostility to the Whigs cost him his seat in 1837; but he was again elected for Bath in 1841, and continued to represent it till the general election of 1847, when he was again thrown out. He was first returned for Sheffield-which constituency he still represents-in May 1849, and then without opposition. As member for Sheffield, Mr. Roebuck has kept up his peculiar character as an independent critic of the proceedings of all parties from the point of view of an extreme patriotic liberalism. Occasional ill-health has interfered with his parliamentary labours; but he has taken a prominent part in many important debates, and he almost always brings a large amount of valuable and suggestive information to bear upon the subject in hand, and he enforces it, notwithstanding his feeble physical powers, with much energy. He has also on one or two occasions originated important motions. It was he who, in January 1855, moved for inquiry into the conduct of the Russian war, and by carrying the motion against the Aberdeen government by a large majority, forced that government to resign. Mr. Roebuck acted as chairman of the celebrated committee of inquiry appointed in pursuance of his motion. In December 1855 Mr. Roebuck was a candidate for the office of chairman of the new Metropolitan Board of Works, but he was third in the list of candidates when the final vote was taken. He has since then become chairman of the Administrative Reform Association, founded by some merchants of London and others after the exposures of the state of our administrative machinery to which the inquiry into the Russian war led. The association, after starting with great promises, was thought to fail in accomplishing its aspirations; and Mr. Roebuck has recently been trying to re-invigorate it and give it distinct practical aims. Mr. Roebuck is also chairman of the Western Bank of London, and also of the Acadian Charcoal-Iron Company of Nova Scotia. Mr. Roebuck, besides his scattered letters, manifestoes, &c., and his contributions to the 'Westminster' and 'Edinburgh' Reviews, &c., is the author of the following separate works:-'Pamphlets to the People,' 1835; 'The Colonies of England: a Plan for the Government of some portion of our Colonial Possessions,' 1849; and 'The History of the Whig Ministry of 1830 to the passing of the Reform Bill,' 2 vols., 1852. ROEʼLAS, JUAN DE LAS, one of the most distinguished of the Spanish painters, commonly known among Andalusian artists as El Clerigo Roélas, was born at Seville of a distinguished family, about 1558 or 1560: his father, Pedro de las Roélas, was a Spanish admiral, and died in 1566. Roélas is styled in documents and in books el licenciado Juan,' which signifies probably merely that he was a graduate of the University of Seville. Little is known about his education: he is supposed to have studied in Italy, and from his style with some of the scholars of Titian in Venice. In 1603 he painted four pictures for the college of Olivares. From 1607 until 1624 he lived chiefly at Seville and Madrid; and in 1616, after the death of

I

[blocks in formation]

F. Castello, he was a competitor for the place of cabinet painter to the king, Philip III.; notwithstanding the "many years' service of Roélas's father," however, Bartolomé Gonzalez succeeded Castello. Roélas settled in Olivares in 1624, when he was appointed one of the canons of the college, but he died there in the following year, April 23rd, 1625. Francisco Zurbaran was the scholar of Roélas. The works of Roélas are very numerous in Seville; and there are still many in the College of Olivares, and there are some at Madrid. His master-piece is the death or 'el Transito' of San Isidoro, in the church of that saint at Seville; this is a large majestic composition, in two compartments, similar to the communion of St. Jerome by Domenichino, and other Italian pictures, but on a larger scale. In the lower part is the archbishop in a church in the attitude of prayer and about to die, supported and surrounded by his numerous clergy, among which are some magnificent heads; in the upper part of the picture is our Saviour on his throne, with the Madonna by his side, and surrounded by angels; the attention of all is directed to the dying saint. This picture, it appears, has never been engraved; indeed, very few good Spanish pictures have been engraved, and it is owing to this circumstance that the great painters of Spain are so little known out of their own provinces. One of his best works also is the Saint Iago, in the Capilla de Santiago, in the Cathedral of Seville: the saint is riding over Moors; it was painted in 1609. Bermudez speaks of it as full of fire, majesty, and decorum. According to Mr. Ford ('Handbook of Spain'), it is surpassed by the picture of the Conception, by Roélas, in the Academy; and by three in the chapel of the University of Seville-a 'Holy Family, with Jesuits;' a Nativity;' and an 'Adoration.' "No one," says this writer," ever painted the sleek grimalkin Jesuit like Roélas." Pacheco, who was censor of pictures in Seville [PACHECO], reproached Roélas with want of decorum in a picture, in the Merced Calzada, of St. Anne Teaching the Virgin to Read,' for representing some sweetmeats and some articles of common domestic life upon a table in the picture; and also for painting a sheet, intended to wrap the infant Saviour in, who is naked, in the picture of the 'Nativity,' in the chapel of the university. Roélas is compared with Tintoretto and the Caracci; he is the best of the Andalusian painters in design and composition, and displays frequently a grandeur of form and majesty of character which belong only to the greatest masters: in colouring also he may be compared with the Venetians. His last picture is apparently the 'Nativity,' at Olivares. Palomino's account of this painter is almost wholly incorrect; he calls him Doctor Pablo de las Roélas.

(Cean Bermudez, Diccionario Historico, &c.) ROGER OF HOVEDEN. [HOVEDEN.] *ROGERS, HENRY, now Professor of Philosophy at Spring-Hill Independent College, Birmingham, and well known as an English Essayist, and the author of works designed to exhibit the harmony of Philosophy and Revealed Religion, was educated at Highbury College, and was for some time an Independent preacher. The duties of this office not agreeing with his health, he resigned his charge. He was afterwards for a time Professor of the English Language and Literature in University College, London. Thence he removed to his present situation.

Within the last ten or fifteen years Mr. Rogers, by his contributions to the Edinburgh Review,' has won himself the high place which he occupies in the contemporary literature of Britain. Probably since Mr. Macaulay ceased to write for the Edinburgh,' Mr. Rogers has been the most distinguished of its regular contributors in the kinds of topics formerly treated by Mr. Macaulay in the pages of that periodical. His articles have been numerous and on very various subjects-some critical, some historical or biographical, and some speculative. A collection of them was republished in 1850 under the title of Essays selected from Contributions to the Edinburgh Review; and this collection, increased in bulk by an additional volume published in 1855, has passed through more than one edition. It is by these three volumes of republished Essays' that Mr. Rogers is best known; but he is also the author of The Life and Character of John Howe, M.A., with an Analysis of his Writings,' 1836; of General Introduction to a Course of Lectures on English Grammar and Composition,' 1838; of a well-known work on the present state of religious opinion entitled The Eclipse of Faith;' and of a Defence' of that work, published in 1854 in reply to Mr. Francis Newman. Mr. Rogers officiated, along with Mr. Isaac Taylor, as Examiner of the Essays given in for the Burnett prizes of Aberdeen in 1854, and awarder of the prizes.

ROGERS, SAMUEL, was born on the 30th of July 1763, at Newington Green, a suburb of London. His father, who was a Dissenter, and much respected by the Dissenters of London, was a banker by profession; and the poet, after a careful private education, was placed, when yet a lad, in the banking-house to learn the business prior to his becoming a partner. Among his reminiscences of this time was that of Wilkes calling at the banking-house to solicit his father's vote, and, as his father was out, shaking hands with him as his father's representative. From a very early period, the future poet exhibited a taste for letters, and he used to date his first determination towards poetry from the effect produced upon him by reading Beattie's 'Minstrel,' when a mere boy. His admiration of literature and literary men led him, while still a clerk in his father's bank, to

[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

meditate a call on Dr. Johnson for the purpose of introducing himself; and once, with a young friend, he went to Johnson's house in Bolt Court bent on accompanying the object, but his courage failed him when he had his hand on the knocker. It was in 1786-two years after Johnson's death-that Rogers, then in his twenty-third year, published his first volume of poetry, under the title of An Ode to Superstition, and some other Poems. The date is important. "The commencement of a new era in British Poetry," says a critic, "dates almost exactly from this year. For a year or two before 1786, there had been manifestations of a new poetic spirit, differing from that of the poetry of the 18th century as a whole, and more particularly from that of Darwin, Hayley, and the Della Cruscans who represented the poetry of the 18th century in its latest and dying stage. Crabbe, for example, had published his 'Library' in 1781; and Cowper had made his first distinct appearance as a poet in 1782, when he was already in his fifty-second year. Crabbe's Village' was published in 1783, and Cowper first made an effective impression by the publication of his second volume, including his 'Task,' in 1785. Thus Rogers was heard of as a poet almost at the same time as Crabbe and Cowper. But more exactly contemporary with Rogers than either Crabbe or Cowper, was Robert Burns, the first edition of whose poems appeared in that very year, 1786, which saw Rogers's début as an author." In short, Rogers's first appearance as a poet coincides with the opening of that era in our literature in which we still are, and of which Rogers himself is one of the minor stars. Shortly after his first publication, Rogers travelled in France, where he saw Condorcet and many other men afterwards celebrated in the French Revolution. He also visited Scotland, where he saw Adam Smith, Dr. Robertson, and other celebrities. In 1792 he published his 'Pleasures of Memory,' by which, and by a subsequent volume containing 'An Epistle to a Friend and other Poems,' published in 1798, he "established his place among the men of letters who adorned Great Britain in the closing decade of the last century." During the next fourteen years he gave nothing new to the world, either to increase or to mar his reputation. It was during this long interval of silence that he retired from his hereditary business as a banker (though with an income still derived from the bank, and with the nominal character of partner continued to him) to enjoy, by means of his ample wealth, a leisure absolutely at the command of his private tastes. "The house of Rogers in St. James's-place," it is said, "became a little paradise of the beautiful, where, amid pictures and other objects of art, collected with care and arranged with skill, the happy owner nestled in fastidious ease, and kept up among his contemporaries a character in which something of the Horace was blended with some. thing of the Macenas." As he had known Fox, and Horne Tooke, and Dr. Price, and Dr. Priestley, and Lord Nelson, and others of the eminent men of the former generation, so now he gathered round his table the political and social, and literary and dramatic celebrities who had succeeded them-Wordsworth, Scott, Byron, Coleridge, Mackintosh, Southey, Wellington, Chantrey, &c., &c. His own political sentiments were those of moderate Whiggism, but this did not prevent men of all parties from being his guests.

[ocr errors]

In 1812, Rogers, when his muse seemed dead, added to a republication of his earlier poems, the fragment entitled 'Columbus.' He was then in his fiftieth year. In 1814 his 'Jacqueline' was published in conjunction with Byron's 'Lara,' this being the period of the height of the intimacy between the two so dissimilar poets. "Composed with the same laborious slowness, and polished line by line to the same degree of smoothness," says the writer of a sketch of his life, "his Human Life' appeared in 1819. Finally, as the last and much the longest of his productions, came his 'Italy,' the first part of which was published in 1822, in the poet's sixtieth year, and the complete edition of which, illustrated, under the author's care, at an expense of 10,000l. by Stothard, Prout, and Turner, did not appear till 1836. With the preparation of this exquisite book his literary career may be said to have closed. He still wrote an occasional copy of verses at the rate of a couplet a week; and some of these trifles, including one written as late as his ninety-first year, are preserved in his collected works. But on the whole it was in his character as a superannuated poet, living on the reputation of his past performances, drawing the artists and wits, and men of rank of a more modern age around him, and entertaining them with his caustic talk, and his reminiscences of the notable persons and events of former days, that he figured in a select portion of London society during the last twenty years of his existence." The longevity of the poet was, indeed, one of the sources of the public interest felt for him in his later life. Always fond of open air exercise and of going to public exhibitions, he might be seen strolling about in the parks, or in a stall or box at the opera, to within a few years of his death. An accident in the streets at last disabled him from walking out; but the extraordinary tenacity of his constitution enabled him to recover from it, when a younger man might have died. It was not till the 18th of December 1855, when he was in his ninety-third year, and had already for many years been the literary patriarch of his country, that he departed this life. Wordsworth and many others who had been born after him, and had attained old age under his view, had predeceased him, and left him alone among a generation of juniors.

Rogers will be remembered partly for his poetry, and partly from

« السابقةمتابعة »