صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني

OF

SHAKESPEARE

EDITED BY

HORACE HOWARD FURNESS, PH.D., LL.D.

HONORARY MEMBER OF THE DEUTSCHE SHAKESPEARE-GESELLSCHAFT OF WEIMAR

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

ΤΟ

'THE NEW SHAKSPERE SOCIETY'

THIS VOLUME

IS

RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED

BY

THE EDITOR

PREFACE

SINCE these volumes, containing separate plays, are independent of each other, it seems necessary that a statement of the plan on which they are edited should accompany each issue. This statement, however, in the present instance shall be as concise as possible; it is to be presumed that those who are interested in this edition are, by this time, tolerably familiar with its scope.

The attempt is here made to present, on the same page with the text, all the various readings of the different editions of King Lear, from the earliest Quarto to the latest critical edition of the play, together with all the notes and comments thereon which the Editor has thought worthy of preservation, not only for the purpose of elucidating the text, but at times as illustrations of the history of Shakespearian criticism.

In the APPENDIX will be found essays on THE TEXT, THE Date OF COMPOSITION, THE SOURCE OF THE PLOT, DURATION OF THE ACTION, INSANITY, ACTORS, COSTUME, TATE'S VERSION, selections from ENGLISH and GERMAN CRITICISMS, a list of THE EDITIONS COLLATED, with the abbreviations used to denote them, the BIBLIOGRAPHY of the Play, and an INDEX.

We have two sources for the text of Lear, the Quartos and the Folios, both from independent manuscripts. Although we may not have in the Folio the very text, 'absolute in its numbers,' as Shakespeare conceived it,' yet with all its defects it is much better than that of the Quarto, which is evidently one of those 'stolne and sur'reptitious' copies denounced by Heminge and Condell. Wherefore, in this edition the text of the FIRST FOLIO has been virtually fol

« السابقةمتابعة »