both Rousseau and Bolingbroke.* If however, further information is required upon this subject, the honest inquirer may find his utmost scruples amply combatted, by looking into Mr. Bogue's excellent "Essay on the Divine authority of the New Testament," a little book drawn up as a gift to the infidels of France, and most admirably adapted to subdue the anti-christian prejudices of any people.

Till you convince an Infidel that the WORD OF GOD is indeed genuine, you but "beat the air," to urge him to read it as his great rule of life: but when convinced....he knows, he must not only study it, but must obey it, or perish.

"Jesus

Even Paine has not scrupled to say, that Christ was a virtuous, and an amiable man; that the morality he preached and practised, was of the most benevolent kind; and that it has not been exceeded by any." Similar concessions have been made, at different times, by Blount and Tindal, and by Morgan, Toland, Chubb, and others.

SHORT AND EASY METHOD

WITH THE

DEISTS.

SIR,

1. IN answer to your's of the 3d instant, I much condole with your unhappy circumstances, of being placed amongst such company, where, as you say, you continually hear the sacred scriptures, and the histories therein contained, particularly of Moses, and of Christ, and all revealed religion, turned into ridicule, by men who set up for sense and reason. And they say, that there is no greater ground to believe in Christ than in Mahomet: that all these pretences to revelation are cheats, and ever have been, among Pagans, Jews, Mahometans, and Christians: that they are all alike impositions of cunning and designing men, upon the credulity, at first, of simple and unthinking people; till, their numbers increas ing, their delusions grew popular, came at last to be established by laws; and then

the force of education and custom gives a bias to the judgments of after ages, till such deceits come really to be believed, being received upon trust from the ages foregoing, without examining into the original and bottom of them. Which these our modern men of sense, (as they desire to be esteemed) say, that they only de; that they only have their judgments freed from the slavish authority of precedents and laws, in matters of truth; which, they say, ought only to be decided by reason: though, by a prudent compliance with popularity and laws, they preserve themselves from outrage, and legal penalties; for none of their complexion are addicted to sufferings, or martyrdom.

"

Now, sir, that which you desire from me, is, some short topic of reason, if such can be found, without running to authori ties, and the intricate mazes of learning, which breed long disputes; and which these men of reason deny by wholesale, though they can give no reason for it, only suppose that authors have been trumped upon us, interpolated, and corrupted, so that no stress can be laid upon them: though it cannot be shown wherein they are so corrupted; which, in reason, ought to lie upon them to prove, who alledge it!

otherwise it is not only a precarious, but a guilty plea and the more, that they refrain not to quote books on their side, for whose authority there are no better, or not so good grounds. However, you say, it makes your disputes endless, and they go away with noise and clamour, and a boast, that there is nothing, at least nothing certain, to be said on the Christian side. Therefore you are desirous to find some one topic of reason, which should demonstrate the truth of the Christian religion, and at the same time distinguish it from the impostors of Mahomet, and the old Pagan world; that our Deists may be brought to this test, and be either obliged to renounce their reason, and the common reason of mankind, or to submit to the clear proof, from reason, of. the Christian religion: which must be such a proof, as no imposture, can pretend to, otherwise it cannot prove the Christian religion not to be an imposture. And whether such a proof, one single proof, (to avoid confusion,) is not to be found out, you desire to know from me.

And you say, that you cannot imagine but there must be such a proof, because every truth is in itself clear, and one. And therefore that one reason for it, if it be the true reason, must be sufficient ; and if suffi

B

cient, it is better than many; for multiplicity confounds, especially to weak judgments.

Sir, you have imposed a hard task upon me. I wish I could perform it. For though every truth is one; yet our sight is so feeble, that we cannot (always) come to it directly, but by many inferences, and laying of things together.

But I think, that, in the case before us, there is such a proof as you require; and I will set it down as short and plain as I

can.

II. First, then, I suppose that the truth of the doctrine of Christ will be sufficiently evinced, if the matters of fact which are recorded of him in the gospels, be true: for his miracles, if true, do vouch the truth of what he delivered...

If

The same is to be said as to Moses. he brought the children of Israel through the Red Sea, in that miraculous manner which is related in Exodus, and did such other wonderful things as are there told of him, it must necessarily follow, that he was sent from God: these being the strongest proofs we can desire; and which every Deist will confess he would acquiesce in, if he saw them with his eyes. Therefore the stress of this cause will depend upon the proof of these matters of fact.