« السابقةمتابعة »
Julian Pe- Ghost, and Philip, and Prochorus, and Nicanor, and Jerusalem.
adopt names for their children from the Greek, but from the He.
brew or Syriac languages. From these circumstances Mosheim
believes that these seven men were not intrusted with the care of
the whole of the poor at Jerusalem : for can any one suppose,
he continues, that the Hebrews would have consented that the
relief of their own widows and poor, should be thus committed to
the discretion of the Jews of the foreign class? The native Jews
would in this case have been liable to experience the same injus-
tice from the foreign brethren, as the latter had to complain of,
whilst the alms were at the disposal of the Hebrews; and in-
stead, therefore, of at once striking at the root of the evil which
they proposed to cure, the apostle would by such an arrange-
ment, bave merely applied to it a very uncertain kind of remedy.
Besides, tbe indigenous Jews made no complaint against those
who had hitherto managed the concerns of the poor; and con-
sequently tbere could be no necessity for their dismissal from
office. It appears, therefore, clear beyond a doubt, that those
seven men were not invested with the care of the poor in ge-
neral, but were appointed merely as curators of the widows
and poor of the foreigners or Greeks; and that the others con.
tinued, under the guardianship of those, wbo prior to the ap-
pointment of the seven, were intrusted with the superintendance
and discretionary relief of the whole. Champ. Vitringa saw
the matter evidently in this light, as is plain from his work, De
Synagoga, lib. iii. part ii. cap. 5. p. 928. As to the reason which
caused the number of these men to be fixed at seven, I conceive
that it is to be found in the state of the Church at Jerusalem, at
the time of their appointment. The Christians in that city
1 were most likely divided into seven classes ; the members of
each of these divisions having a separate place of assembly. It
was therefore deemed expedient that seven curators should be
appointed, in order that every division might be furnished with
an officer or superintendant of its own, whose immediate duty
it should be to take care that the widows and the poor of the
foreigners should come in for an equitable share of the alms
and benefactions, and to see that due relief was administered
according to the necessities of the different individuals (h).
Lightfoot (i), Dr. Clarke, and many others, have attempt-
ed to assimilate the 1'0370 of the Jewisb synagogue with the
Christian deacons, now appointed. There does not appear to
be any other resemblance than this, that one part of their duty
was common to both, the charge of the poor. That the office
of deacon among the Christians was more than this, has been
shewn both from Scripture, and its only right interpreters on
these matters, the early Fathers.
(a) Lightfoot's Works, vol. iii. p. 182. Pitman's edition. (6) Hæres.
p. 50. sect. 4. ap. Whitby. (c) Ita ordo quidam in Ecclesia singularis
jam tum impositione manuum institutus est. Actus quidem, ad quam
instituti sunt, nihil aliud est, quam olakovciv spatélais, et constituti
sunt tri rautns rñs xpeias, quæ consistebat iv diakovia tn
ka nuepivn. Officium tamen non fuit mere civile, ani economicam,
sed sacrum etiam, sive Ecclesiasticum. Mensæ enim Discipulorum
tunc temporis communes, et sacræ etiam fuere ; hoc est in communi
convictu Sacramentum Eucharistiæ celebrabant, &C.-Pearsoni in Acta
'Apostol. Lectione, p. 53. Schoetgen has decided in favour of the opi-
nion which is apparently best supported by Scripture, that the deacons
were of two kinds, of tables, and of the word. The deaconsbip or
ministry of tables ceased after the first dispersion, and Philip then re-
sumed the deaconship of the word. Post diaoropày vero cessabat
Julian Pe- Timon, and Parmenas, and Nicolas a proselyte of An- Jerasalem. riod, 4745. tioch 31 :
algar&ra, 6 Whom they set before the apostles : and when they 32.
had prayed, they laid their hands on them.
The Church continues to increase in Number da.
ACTs vi. 7.
7 And the word of God increased ; and the number of
32 The chronologers of the New Testament have generally
assigned the martyrdom of St. Stephen to the year 33, or 34, of
the Vulgar fra, from the supposition that our Lord was cruci-
fied in the year 33. In this arrangement the opinion of Benson
bas been adopted, which places the death of Cbrist in the year
of the Vulgar Æra 29, and of the Julian Period 4742. This
hypothesis will, I trust, be found consistent with the gene-
ral opinion respecting the date of the martyrdom of Stephen.
St. Luke not having given us in the Acts of the Apostles any
express data for the chronology of either of these great events,
several arguments seem to warrant and justify the dates here
affixed to the different portions of the Sacred History, from
the ascension, 29, to the martyrdom of St. Stephen, 33.
It will be observed that tbese dates are as follow:
The establishment of the Christian Church, by the miracle
at Pentecost, and first accession of converts............ 29
The increasing prosperity of the Church, after the healing
of the cripple .........
The increase of the Church, in consequence of the death of
Ananias and Sapphira ...............................
The increase of the Church, in consequence of the impri-
sonment and release of the Apostles.......
Persecution and death of Stephen .... ................. 33
It must be remembered that St. Luke, who was the author of
tbe book of the Acts of the Apostles, was principally anxious to
relate the chief circumstances of the life of St. Paul, and those
actions of St. Peter, which were introductory to the preaching
of the Gospel among the Gentiles. In many instances, there-
fore, he has not only studied brevity, but has passed over a
variety of important journeys and circumstances familiarly
alluded to in St. Paul's Epistles. He almost wholly omits what
passed among the Jews after St. Paul's conversion-the disper.
sion of Christianity in the East-the lives and deaths of the
apostles—the foundation of the Church at Rome-St. Paul's
journey into Arabia, and other events. It may therefore excite
surprize, that the Evangelist, who is in general so eminently
concise, should so frequently repeat similar expressions, unless
we consider them as relating to distinct occurrences in the
Church. We find for instance in Acts ii. 47. after the feast of
Pentecost, the Lord added to the Church daily such as should
Acts iv. 32. after the healing of the cripple--the multitude of them that “ believed, were of one heart and of one soul.”
In Acts v. 14. after the death of Ananias-" believers were the more added to the Lord, multitudes both of meo and women.”
And, after the release of the apostles, Acts vi. 7.-" the word of God increased, and the number of the disciples multiplied in Jerusalem greatly, and a great company of the priests were obedient to the faith ;" all which espressions and different events seem to imply, that a much longer period than one yoar
Julian Pe- the disciples multiplied in Jerusalem greatly; and a Jerusalem.
. great company of the priests were obedient to the faith. 33.
elapsed before the dispersion of the Church at Jerusalem and
the martyrdom of St. Stepben: and this supposition has in-
duced me to place the latter with the generality of commenta-
tors in the year 33.
I cannot but think that Daniel's celebrated prophecy of the
seventy weeks describes with much accuracy the gradual esta-
blishment of Christianity at Jerusalem, in the progressive man-
ner apparently related by St. Luke. Prideaux makes the seventy
weeks, or four hundred and pipety years, which were to elapse
between the going forth of the decree to build the city, and the
confirming of the covenant, to commence with the year of the
Julian Period 4256, which he considers as correspondent with
the year 458 before Christ, the first seven weeks terminating
with the complete establishment of the Jewish Church and
state, forty-nine years after. Threescore and two weeks were
then to elapse, after which Messiah was to be cut off, Dan. ix.
26. and this brings us to the year 4739 of the Julian Period, and
26 A.D. Thus far we are agreed.
There now remains, to conclude the prophecy, the one week,
or seven years. In this week (see Dan. ix. 27.) the covenant is
to be confirmed" and in the midst of it he shall cause tbe sa-
crifice and the oblation to cease." Prideaux assigns to these
seven days, or years, the following events.
4739 The first day of the week--the ministry of John begins
to confirm the covenant.
4742 The middle of the week—the ministry of Christ.
4746 End of the seventieth week-Christ is crucified.
Highly as I respect the authority of Prideaux, I cannot coin-
cide in this arrangement of events, by which he would interpret
this wonderful prophecy. Daniel appears to me to assert, in the
most express manner, that the sacrifice shall be caused to cease in
the midst of the week, and it could not possibly cease till our Lord,
the typified Sacrifice, was offered up. It is further declared,
that the covenant shall be confirmed through the whole week.
These considerations have induced me to give a more literal io-
terpretation of the passage, which seems to me also corroborat-
ed by other chronological calculations. I consider, then, the
prophecy to be fulfilled by the following arrangement of events,
which I would substitute for those given by Prideaux; and by
which bis hypothesis is made to harmonize with that of Benson,
Hales, and others.
J. P. A.D.
4739 26 First day of the week-Christ's ministry begins,
and the covenant is confirmed.
4742 29 In the balf-part or middle of the week-the Mos-
siah is cut off, and the sacrifice is caused to
cease by the death of Christ. He confirms his
covenant by sending down the Holy Spirit.
4743 30 The covenant is further confirmed by the second
great effusion of the Holy Spirit.
4744 31. The death of Ananias, and the rapid increase of
the Church, prove the truth of the covenant.
4745 32 The covenant is more fully confirmed by the
complete establishment of the Church, tbe con-
version of the priests, &c. &c.
Jerusalem. riod, 4746,
Valgarra, Stephen having boldly asserted the Messiahship of Christ,
33 or 34.
is accused of Blasphemy before the Sanhedrim.
ACTs vi. 8-14.
8 And Stephen, full of faith and power, did great won-
ders and miracles among the people.
9 Then there arose certain of the synagogue, which is
called the synagogue of the Libertines *, and Cyrenians,
4746 33 The last year of the seventy weeks begins, and
the covenant is ratified by the blood of the first
martyr. Then, and then only, the Jews began
to fill up the measure of the iniquities of their
fathers, by resisting the testimony of the Holy
Ghost. Tbe seventy weeks having now ex-
pired, they are permitted to persecute the
Church of Christ even onto death, drawing
down upon them by their abominations and
cruelty, the destruction of their city and sanc-
tuary, the desolation predicted both by our Lord
and his prophets.
In addition to the arguments already given in favour of the
present arrangement, which makes pearly four years intervene
between the death of Christ and the martyrdom of Stephen, I
must add the authority of Tacitus, who states that after the
death of Christ bis religion was for a time suppressed, but that
it afterwards broke out, not only in Judea, but through the
whole world. This latter clause seems to me evidently to refer
to the first persecution of the disciples, when they were obliged
to fly from Jerusalem, and carried with them the Gospel in
every direction. Some time must have elapsed before the
Church could have been so fully established, as to have become
obnoxious to the Jewish rulers, its founders being the most
despised and humble of men. The passage from Tacitus refers
to the persecution of the Christians by Nero-Quos, vulgus
Christianos appellabat. Auctor nominis ejus Christus, qui Ti.
berio imperitante, per Procuratorem Pontium Pilatum, supplicio
affectus erat. Repressaque io præsens, exitiabilis superstitio
rursus erumpebat, non modo per Judeam, originem ejus mali,
sed per urbem etiam, quo, &c.
33' Various opinions have been entertained respecting the
synagogue of the Libertines here mentioned. Mr. Horne sup-
poses, and so likewise do Bishop Marsh and Michaelis, that the
word' Acbeprivou is evidently the same as the Latin Libertini.
Whatever meaning we affix to this word, says Bishop Marsh,
(for it is variously explained,) whether we understand emanci-
pated slaves, or the sons of emancipated slaves, they must have
been the slaves, or the sons of slaves, to Roman masters; other-
wise the Latin word Libertini would not apply to them. That
among persons of this description there were many at Rome, who
prosessed the Jewish religion, whether slaves of Jewish origin,
or proselytes after manumission, is nothing very extraordinary.
But that they should have been so numerous at Jerusalem as to
have a synagogue in that city, built for their particular use,
appears at least to be more than might be expected. Some
commentators, therefore, bave supposed that the term in ques-
tion, instead of denoting emancipated Roman slaves, or the sons