Jenks v. Doran, 5 Ont. A. R. 558 (1880). Contra, section 21, s-s. 2 (d). Jones v. Broadhurst, 9 C. B. 173 (1850), qualified in Cook v. Lister, 13 C. B. N. S. 597 (1863); discussed in Thornton v. Maynard, L. R. 10 C. P. 698 (1875); questioned in Soloman v. Davis, 1 C. & E. 83 (1883).

Jones v. Goudie, 2 Rev. de Leg. 334 (1820). Contra, section 17, s-s. 2. Jones v. Hart, 2 Rev. de Leg. 29 (1819), overruled. See p. 40.

Jones v. Lane, 3 Y. & C. 281 (1839), overruled by Deuters v. Townsend,

5 B. & S. 613 (1864).

Jones v. Whitty, 9 L. C. R. 191 (1859). Contra, section 8, s-s. 4.

Keates v. Whieldon, 8 B. & C. 7 (1828), overruled by Cheetham v. Butler, 5 B. & Ad. 837 (1833).

Keene v. Beard, 8 C. B. N. S. 372 (1860), qualified in Hopkinson v. Forster, L. R. 19 Eq. 76 (1874).

Kirk v. Blurton, 9 M. & W. 284 (1841), questioned in Forbes v. Marshall, 11 Ex. at p. 180 (1855); distinguished in Odell v. Cormack, 19 Q. B. D. 223 (1887).

Lagueux v. Casault, 2 Rev. de Leg. 28 (1813), overruled. See p. 40.
Lagueux v. Everett, 1 Rev. de Leg. 510 (1817). Contra, section 17, s-s. 2.
Lambert, Ex parte, 13 Ves. 179 (1794), overruled in Ex parte Swan,
L. R. 6 Eq. 358 (1868).

Latour v. Gauthier, 2 L. C. L. J. 149 (1866). Contra, section 56.
Lloyd v. Chune, 2 Giffard, 441 (1860), criticised in Re Whitaker, 42 Ch.
D. 125 (1889).

Marler v. Molsons Bank, 23 L. C. J. 293 (1879). Contra, sections 53 and 72.

Massue v. Crebassa, 7 L. C. J. 211 (1863), overruled.
McCorkill v. Barrabe, M. L. R. 1 S. C. 319 (1885).

S-s. 4.

See p. 358.
Contra, section 8,

McDonnell v. Holgate, 2 Rev. de Leg. 29 (1821). See p. 42.

McPhee v. McPhee, 19 O. R 603 (1890), overruled by Robertson v. Lons

dale, 22 O. R. (1892).

Merchants' Bank v. Spinney, 13 N. S. (1 R. & G.) 87 (1879). Contra, section 51, s-s. 7.

Merchants' Bank v. Stirling, 13 N. S. (1 R. & G.) 439 (1880). Contra, section 63, s-s. 2.

Merritt v. Maxwell, 14 U. C. Q. B. 50 (1886). Contra, section 90, s-s. 2. Mertens v. Winnington, 1 Esp. 113 (1794), doubted in Ex parte Wyld, 2 De G. F. & J. 650 (1860).

Montgomery v. Boucher, 14 U. C. C. P. 45, (1964), overruled by St. John v. Rykert, 10 S. C. Can. 278 (1884).

Musgrave v. Drake, 5 Q. B. 185 (1843), dissented from in Hogg v. Skeen, 18 C. B. N. S. at p. 426 (1865).

Napier v. Schneider, 12 East, 420 (1810), held overruled in Re Genera
South American Co., 7 Ch. D. 644 (1877).

Narbonne v. Letreau, 9 L. C. J. 80 (1863).
Nash v. Gibbon, 9 N. B. (4 Allen) 479 (1860).

Contra, section 56.
Contra, section 9 (d).

O'Connor v. Clarke, 18 Grant, 422 (1871), overruled by St. John v. Rykert, 10 S. C. Can. 278 (1884).

Owen v. Van Uster, 10 C. B. 318 (1850), distinguished in Re Barnard, 32 Ch. D. 452 (1886).

Palmer v. Fahnestock, 9 U. C. C. P. 172 (1859). Contra, section 9 (d). Parry v. Nicholson, 13 M. & W. 778 (1845), doubted in Hirschmann v. Budd, L. R. 8 Ex. 172 (1873).

Pariseau v. Ouellet, M. C. R. 69 (1850). Contra, section 56.

Partridge v. Bank of England, 9 Q. B. 396 (1846), criticised in Goodwin v. Robarts, L. R. 10 Ex. 354 (1875).

Paterson v. Hardacre, 4 Taunt. 114 (1811), overruled by Bailey v. Bidwell, 13 M. & W. 73 (1844).

Paterson v. Pain, 1 L. C, R. 210 (1851). Contra, section 56.

Piers v. Hall, 18 N. B. (2 P. & B.) 34 (1878). Contra, sections 23 and 56. Powell v. Ford, 2 Stark. 164 (1817), disapproved of in Lewis v. Sapio, M. & M. 39 (1827).

Pratt v. Macdougall, 12 L. C. J. 243 (1868). Contra, sections 56 and 72.

Rea v. Meggott, Cas. temp. Hardw. 77 (1730), overruled by Lumley v. Palmer, 2 Str. 1,000 (1734); Windle v. Andrews, 2 B & A. 699, 700 (1819).

Regina v. Hawkes, 2 Moody, C. C. 60 (1840), overruled by Peto v. Reynolds, 9 Ex. 415 (1854).

Richardson v. Daniels, 5 U. C. O. S. 671 (1839). Contra, section 39,

s-s. 2.

Richards, Re, Shenstone v. Brock, 36 Ch. D. 541 (1887), criticised in Re Whitaker, 42 Ch. D. at p. 125 (1889).

Rivet v. Leonard, 1 L. C. J. 172 (1848). Contra, Badeau v. Brault, 1 L. C. J. 171 (1857); Danziger v. Ritchie, 8 L. C. J. 103 (1864). Robarts v. Tucker, 16 Q. B. 560 (1851) distinguished, in Bank of England v. Vagliano (1891), App. Cas. 107.

Robertson v. Kensington, 4 Taunt. 30 (1811). Contra, section 33. Rothschild v. Corney, 9 B. & C. 388 (1829), distinguished in London & County Bank v. Groome, 8 Q. B. D. 288 (1881).

Rothschild v. Currie, 1 Q. B. 43 (1841), questioned in Allen v. Kemble, 6 Moore, P. C. 323 (1848); explained and qualified in Horne v. Rouquette, 3 Q. B. D. 521, 523 (1878)

Rowe v. Young, 2 B. & B. 165. Contra, 1 & 2 Geo. IV. c. 78 (Imp.) and section 19, s-s. 2 (a).

Savage v. Aldren, 2 Stark. 232 (1817). Contra, section 33.

Saxton v. Stevenson, 23 U. C. C. P. 503 (1874). Contra, section 9 (d). Scholey v. Walsby, Peake N. P. C. 34 (1797), doubted in Phillips v. War

ren, 14 M. &. W. 380 (1845).

Seymour v. Wright, 3 L. C. R. 454 (1852), overruled by Mitchell v. Browne, 9 L. C. J. 168 (1865).

Shellard, Ex parte, L. R. 17 Eq. 109 (1873), disapproved in Buck v. Robson, 3 Q. B. D. 689 (1878).

Shepherd v. Harrison, L. R. 5 H. L. 116 (1871), distinguished in Er parte Banner, 2 Ch. D. 279 (1875).

Sibree v. Tripp, 15 M. & W. 23 (1846), distinguished in Foakes v. Beer, 9

App. Cas. at p. 613 (1884).

Solarte v. Palmer, 1 Bing. N. C. 124 (1834), criticised in Everard v. Watson, 1 E. & B. 804 (1853); qualified in Paul v. Joel, 3 H. & N. at p. 459 (1858). Steele v. McKinlay, 5 App. Cas. 754 (1880), distinguished in Wilkinson v. Unwin, 7 Q. B. D. 636 (1881); in Holmes v. Durkee, 1 C. & E. 25 (1883); and in Macdonald v. Whitfield, 8 App. Cas. 733 (1888). Stoesseger v. South Eastern Railway, 3 E. & B. 549 (1854), distinguished in Reg. v. Bowerman, [1891] 1 Q. B. 112, 115.

Strange v. Price, 10 A. & E. 125 (1839), overruled by Paul v. Joel, 3 H. & N. 459 (1858).

Strathy v. Nicholls, 1 U. C. Q. B. 32 (1844), overruled by Muir v. Cameron, 10 Ibid, 356 (18 2).

Strong v. Foster, 17 C. B. 201 (1855), dissented from in Ewin v. Lancaster, 6 B. & S. 576 (1865).

Swinyard v. Bowes, 5 M. & S. 62 (1816), in Camidge v. Allenby, 6 B. & C. 383 (1827).

Tindal v, Brown, 1 T. R. 167 (1786), overruled in Chapman v. Keane, 3 A. & E. 197 (1835).

Tinson v. Francis, 1 Camp. 19 (1807), dissented from in Ex parte Swan. L. R. 6 Eq. 358 (1868).

Trimbey v. Vignier, 1 Bing. N. C. 151 (1834), not followed in Bradlaugh v. De Rin, L. R. 5 C. P. 473 (1870).

Trimingham v. Maud, L. R. 7 Eq. 201 (1868), disapproved in Ex parte Gomez, L. R. 10 Ch. at p. 647 (1875).

Walker v. Barnes, 5 Taunt. 240 (1813), dissented from in Siggers v. Lewis, 1 Cr. M. & R. 370 (1834).

Walwyn v. St. Quintin, 1 B. & P. 652 (1797), overruled in Cory v. Scott, 3 B. & A. 622 (1820).

Warrington v. Furbor, 8 East, 242 (1807), distinguished in Camidge v. Allenby, 6 B. & C. 373 (1827).

West v. Bown. 3 U. C. Q. B. 290 (1847).

Contra, section 8, s-s. 4.

Whatley v. Tricker, 1 Camp. 35 (1897). Contra, section 61.

Contra, section 9 (d).

Wood v. Young, 14 U. C. C. P. 250 (1864).
Woolsey v. Crawford, 2 Camp. 445 (1810), held overruled in Re General
South American Co., 7 Ch. D. 644 (1877).

Young v. Grote, 4 Bing. 253 (1827), questioned in Baxendale v. Bennett,

3 Q. B. D. at p. 534 (1878).

ABBREVIATIONS.

The Nova Scotia and New Brunswick Reports are numbered from the beginning of each series, as N. S. and N. B., respectively; the names of the reporters being added for the earlier volumes.

The United States Supreme Court Reports are cited by the names of the reporters followed by (U. S.), up to volume 90; after that by the number. For State reports the customary contractions are used; when cited by the names of the reporters, the name of the State, as a rule, is added.

British North America Act, 1867.

..Barnewall and Alderson's Reports, King's Bench.
.. Barnewall and Adolphus' Reports, King's Bench.
Broderip and Bingham's Reports, Common Pleas.
Best and Smith's Reports, Queen's Bench.
Barbour's New York Reports.

..

.. Beavan's Rolls Reports.

..Bingham's New Cases, Common Pleas

.. Brown's Chancery Cases.

. Commentaries on Colonial and Foreign Laws, 1838. .Burrow's Reports, King's Bench.

..Byles on Bills, 15th ed., 1891.

..Common Bench Rep'ts, Manning, Granger and Scott.
..Common Bench Reports, New Series, Scott.

..Civil Code of Lower Canada.

..Canadian Law Times, Toronto.

..Common Pleas Division, Law Reports, 1875-90.
.. Consolidated Statutes, Canada, 1859.

.. Consolidated Statutes, Lower Canada, 1861.
..Consolidated Statutes, New Brunswick, 1877.
.. Consolidated Statutes, Upper Canada, 1859.
.Cababe and Ellis' Reports, Nisi Prius.
..Crompton and Jervis' Reports, Exchequer.
. Carrington and Kirwan's Reports, Nisi Prius.
..Crompton and Meeson's Reports, Exchequer.

C. M. & R.
C. & P.
Camp.
Cass.
Ch D.
Chalmers

Car. & M.

Cl. & F.

Code de Com.

Conn.

Cow.

Cranch C. C..

Cushing

D. & L.

..Crompton, Meeson and Roscoe's Reports, Exchequer.
..Carrington and Payne's Reports, Nisi Prius.
..Campbell's Reports, Nisi Prius.

..Court of Cassation, France.

..Chancery Division, Law Reports, 1875-90.
.. Bills of Exchange, 4th ed., 1891.

..Carrington and Marshman's Reports, Nisi Prius.
..Clark and Finnelly's Reports, House of Lords,
..Code de Commerce, France.

Connecticut Reports.

Cowper's Reports, King's Bench.

.Cranch's Circuit Court Reports, U. S.
..Cushing's Reports, Mass.

..Dowling and Lowndes' Practice Reports.

D. & R. N. P. C... Dowling and Ryland's Nisi Prius Cases.

Daniel

DeG. F. & J...
DeG. & J.

DeG. M. & G..

DeG. & Sm.
Dorion
Dougl.
Dra..
E. & B.

E. B. & E.
E. & E.
Esp..

Ex.

Ex. D.

F. & F.

Fed. Rep. Forsyth Grant

H. Bl.

H. L. Cas.

H. & C.

H. & N.

Han.

Holt N. P.

How.
Ill.

Imp. Act,

Ind..

Ir. L. R...
Jac. & W.
Johns.

Jur. N. S.

K. & J.

L. C. J.

L. C. L. J.

L. C. R.

L. J. C. P.
L. J. Ch..
L. J. Ex.

L. J. Q. B.

..Daniel on Negotiable Instruments, 4th ed., 1891.

.De Gex, Fisher and Jones' Reports.

..De Gex and Jones' Reports.

. De Gex, Macnaghten and Gordon's Reports.
..De Gex and Smale's Reports.

..Dorion's Queen Bench Reports, Montreal.
..Douglas' Reports, King's Bench.

..Draper's Upper Canada Reports.

.. Ellis and Blackburn's Reports, Queen's Bench.
..Ellis, Blackburn and Ellis' Reports, Queen's Bench.
..Ellis & Ellis' Reports, Queen's Bench.
..Espinasse's Reports, Nisi Prius,

..Exchequer Reports, Welsby, Hurlstone and Gordon.
.. Exchequer Division, Law Reports, 1875-90.
.. Foster and Finlason's Reports, Nisi Prius,
Federal Reporter. U. S. Circuit and District.
. Forsyth's Constitutional Law, 1869.
..Chancery Reports, U. C. and Ontario.

. Henry Blackstone's Reports, Common Pleas.
.. House of Lords Cases, by Clark.

Hurlstone and Coltman's Reports, Exchequer.
Hurlstone and Norman's Reports, Exchequer.
Hannay's Reports, New Brunswick.

. Holt's Nisi Prius Reports.

..Howard's Reports, U. S. Supreme Court.
Illinois Reports.

..

. Bills of Exchange Act, 1882 (45 and 46 V. c. 61). .. Indiana Reports.

..Irish Law Reports, Common Law.

..Jacob and Walker's Reports, Chancery.

..Johnson's Reports, New York.

..Jurist (English), New Series.

..Kay and Johnson's Reports, Vice-Chancellor's.
..Lower Canada Jurist.

..Lower Canada Law Journal.

..Lower Canada Reports.

..Law Journal (English), Common Pleas.
..Law Journal (English), Chancery.

..Law Journal (English), Exchequer.

..Law Journal (English), Queen's Bench.