...recover; for that two I.— 2 Lev. 196. 2,— 11 Bast, 60. things must concur to support the action: obstruction in the road by the fault of the defendant,...ordinary care to avoid it on the part of the plaintiff. Upon the •principle of these cases, the appellant [*350 is exempted from all liability. Nor is he...

...not dispense with another's using ordinary care for himself. Two things must concur to support the action ; an obstruction in the road by the fault of...ordinary care to avoid it on the part of the plaintiff. In the case of Bridge v. The Grand Junction Railway Co., 3 M. & W. 244, PAKKE, B., says : " The rule...

.... . . One person being in fault will not . dispense with another's using ordinary care for himself. only when he was caught and bound; but then rather Rule refused. 633. GREENLAND ». CHAPIN EXCHEQUER OF PLEAS. 1850 5 Exch. 243 CASE for negligence in...

...against them. One person being in fault will not dispense with another's using ordinary care for himself. Two things must concur to support this action: an...want of ordinary care to avoid it on the part of the plaintiff."6 It is not generally contributory negligence for one not to anticipate the negligence or...

...them. One person's being in fault will not dispense with another's using ordinary care for himself. Two things must concur to support this action : an...ordinary care to avoid it on the part of the plaintiff. Davies vs. Mann, 10 M. & W. 546. Exchequer (1842) . THE DONKEY CASE. The plaintiff fettered the fore...

...against them. One person being in fault will not dispense with another's using ordinary care for himself. Two things must concur to support this action : an...ordinary care to avoid it on the part of the plaintiff. Rule refused. PLUCKWELL t: WILSON. Court of King's Bench, 1832. 5 Carrington & Payne, 375. Action for...

...them. One person's being in fault will not dispense with another's using ordinary care for himself. Two things must concur to support this action : an obstruction in the rond hy the fault of the defendant, and no want of ordinary care to avoid it on the part of the plaintiff....

...ordinary care for himself, lathings must concur to support the action, an obstruction in the road, by tit fault of the defendant, and no want of ordinary care to avoid it on tte part of the plaintiff." The rule laid down in that case has been ever since followed in the courts...

...says: " One person being in fault will not dispense with another's using ordinary care for himself. Two things must concur to support this action, an...ordinary care to avoid it on the part of the plaintiff." 2. The rational basis of this rule of contributory negligence has been the subject of much debate....

...against them. One person being at fault will not dispense with another's using ordinary care for himself. Two things must concur to support this action, an...ordinary care to avoid it on the part of the plaintiff." Among earlier cases in the English Court of King's Bench some of the decisions go so far as to hold...