...because they are essential limitations inherent in the very existence of the American Government." ' ' ' Doubtless Congress, in legislating for the Territories...limitations in favor of personal rights which are formulated by the Constitution." * The new decision and policy with reference to our island possessions may mean,...

...and therein the court, quoting from Mormon Church v, United States, again say (170 US, 345, 34!)): Doubtless Congress in legislating for the Territories...limitations in favor of personal rights which are form ulntfd in the Constitution and ita amendments; but these limitations would exist rather by inference...

...the Constitution and laws of the United States over the territories. Mormon Church case, page 44: " Doubtless Congress, in legislating for the territories would be subject to those fuudi1meiital limitations in favor of personal rights which are formulated in the Constitution and...

...that Congress may exercise, even within a territory, arbitrary or despotic power. Bradley, J., said,21 "Doubtless Congress, in legislating for the territories,...would be subject to those fundamental limitations in favour of personal rights which are formulated in the Constitution and its Amendments; but such limitations...

...Dred Scott case, above quoted, and Mr. Justice Bradley, in the Mormon Church Case, 136 US 1, said: ' ' Doubtless Congress in legislating for the Territories...express and direct application of its provisions." This language was quoted with approbation by Mr. Justice Brown in Dowries v. Bidwll, supra, and in...

...of Jesus Christ of LDS v. United States, 136 US 1, 34 L. ed. 478, 10 Sup. Ct. .Rep. 792, as follows: "Doubtless Congress, in legislating for the territories,...express and direct application of its provisions." And the same idea is carried out in the express declarations of the President in military order No....

...the Louisiana Purchase when the Missouri Compromise was enacted, both the express prohibitions and "those fundamental limitations in favor of personal...formulated in the Constitution and its amendments," are binding upon Congress.28 As Judge McLean even when dissenting admitted : "No powers can be exercised...

...case of the Mormon Church, where he said: "In legislating for the territories Congress would doubtless be subject to those fundamental limitations in favor...than by any express and direct application of its provisions."86 It will be observed that the limitations upon the power of Congress over the territories...

...Sup. Ct. Rep. 717; 41 L. ed. 1172; Thompson v. Utah, 170 US 343; 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 620; 42 L. ed. 1061. amendments; but these limitations would exist rather...Congress derives all its powers, than by any express and distinct application of its provisions;" and (2) the quotation of this observation by Justice Brewer...

...departures they be, were: (1) The remark thrown out by Justice Bradley in the Mormon Church case2 that " Doubtless Congress, in legislating for the Territories...rights which are formulated in the Constitution and its 2See Loughborough v. Blake, 5 Wh. 317; 5 L. 6d. 98; Am. Ins. Co. v. Canter, 1 Pet. 511; 7 I* ed. 242;...