...plaintiff had a right to maintain the action. A jury was thereupon impaneled, and the other issues were submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the 168 »2 A". D. en, plaintiff. Judgment was entered pursuant to such verdict. Defendant did not move...

...defendant's witnesses. The defendant set up as an affirmative defense an item of $194.68 which it claimed was owing to it from the plaintiff as the unpaid balance...defendant has appealed from that judgment to this court. Appellant first contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a nonsuit at the end...

...and expenses incurred on the second contract. The liability of the defendant under the first contract was submitted to the Jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the defendant. Both the plaintiff and defendant appeal. [1 , 2] On the appeal of the defendant H is first...

...the car driven by Dr. Martin, and the appellant received the injuries for which recovery is sought. The case was submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the appellees. The appellee Chase G. Johnson was the owner of the car that was being driven at the time...

...the close of the testimony each party moved for a directed verdict in its favor. Both motions were denied, and the case was submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff excepted to the denial of its motion for a directed verdict, on the...

...otherwise." The question as to whether the transactions constituted a doing of business in the state was submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, Rogers. From the judgment entered on the verdict, the plaintiff credit company appealed....

...generally that there was a dam, and also denied that there was any negligence on its part. The cause was submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $547. The case was taken on error to the Court of Appeals, which court affirmed the judgment...

...went to trial. A motion of the defendant to direct a verdict, duly made, was overruled, and the cause was submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict In favor of the .plaintiff, upon which judgment was rendered, and that Judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals....

...unreasonable discrimination in the matter of furnishing facilities for transportation under the act of 18S3. The case was submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and, judgment having been entered thereon, the defendant took this appeal. It was found...

...that she had any knowledge or notice of any such representative character. The questions were fairly submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $325. The facts proved warranted a verdict against Morgan individually, for his liability...